{"title":"ON THE QUESTION OF THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE ‘ROYAL’ HUNS AND THE AKATZIRS IN THE NORTHERN BLACK SEA REGION IN THE EARLY 5th CENTURY","authors":"А.А. Внуков, С.В. Ярцев, Т.В. Брынза","doi":"10.53737/4959.2023.89.28.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Главной целью исследования было выяснение обстоятельств организации правящими кругами Константинополя покушения на гуннского вождя Харатона. Ввиду данных письменных и археологических источников, главной и, пожалуй, единственной причиной этого предприятия могли быть частые набеги на имперские территории со стороны «царских» гуннов, усилившихся в Барбарикуме. Однако, согласно греко-латинской традиции, в интервале 408—412 гг. существенных столкновений между гуннами и константинопольскими войсками не было. Следовательно, причина обострения взаимоотношений между «царскими» гуннами и Восточной Римской империей была в другом. Исходя из анализа археологических источников Восточного Крыма, яблоком раздора в указанное время могло стать Боспорское царство, которое с конца IV в. находилось под защитой гуннов-акациров, восточной ветви кочевников, усилившихся в Северном Причерноморье после падения королевства Германариха. Вероятнее всего именно в начале V в. под предводительством Дуптуна акациры смогли отстоять в союзе с Константинополем свою независимость и сдержать натиск «царских» гуннов в Северном Причерноморье, тем самым отсрочив разорение Боспора. The main goal of the study was to clarify the circumstances of the organization by the Constantinople’s ruling elite of an assassination attempt against the Huns’ leader Charaton. Judging by both written sources and archaeological record, it is strengthening of the ‘royal’ Huns’ forces in Barbaricum and their frequent raids on imperial territories, which could only have been the main and only reason for such an enterprise. However, according to the Greco-Latin tradition, there were no significant military clashes between the Huns and the Constantinopolitan army between 408 and 412. Consequently, there must have been another reason why the situation became so strained. Based on the analysis of archaeological materials from Eastern Crimea, the conclusion is that the Bosporan Kingdom could most likely have been the apple of discord at that time, which from the end of the 4th century was under the protection of the Huns—Akatzirs, the eastern branch of the nomads who strengthened in the Northern Black Sea area after the fall of the kingdom of Ermanaric. It seems likely that it was in the early 5th century that the Akatzirs were able to defend their independence in alliance with Constantinople under the leadership of Douptounos and hold back the onslaught of the ‘royal’ Huns in the Northern Black Sea region, thus delaying the devastation of the Bosporus.","PeriodicalId":33987,"journal":{"name":"Materialy po arkheologii i istorii antichnogo i srednevekovogo Prichernomor''ia","volume":"123 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materialy po arkheologii i istorii antichnogo i srednevekovogo Prichernomor''ia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53737/4959.2023.89.28.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Главной целью исследования было выяснение обстоятельств организации правящими кругами Константинополя покушения на гуннского вождя Харатона. Ввиду данных письменных и археологических источников, главной и, пожалуй, единственной причиной этого предприятия могли быть частые набеги на имперские территории со стороны «царских» гуннов, усилившихся в Барбарикуме. Однако, согласно греко-латинской традиции, в интервале 408—412 гг. существенных столкновений между гуннами и константинопольскими войсками не было. Следовательно, причина обострения взаимоотношений между «царскими» гуннами и Восточной Римской империей была в другом. Исходя из анализа археологических источников Восточного Крыма, яблоком раздора в указанное время могло стать Боспорское царство, которое с конца IV в. находилось под защитой гуннов-акациров, восточной ветви кочевников, усилившихся в Северном Причерноморье после падения королевства Германариха. Вероятнее всего именно в начале V в. под предводительством Дуптуна акациры смогли отстоять в союзе с Константинополем свою независимость и сдержать натиск «царских» гуннов в Северном Причерноморье, тем самым отсрочив разорение Боспора. The main goal of the study was to clarify the circumstances of the organization by the Constantinople’s ruling elite of an assassination attempt against the Huns’ leader Charaton. Judging by both written sources and archaeological record, it is strengthening of the ‘royal’ Huns’ forces in Barbaricum and their frequent raids on imperial territories, which could only have been the main and only reason for such an enterprise. However, according to the Greco-Latin tradition, there were no significant military clashes between the Huns and the Constantinopolitan army between 408 and 412. Consequently, there must have been another reason why the situation became so strained. Based on the analysis of archaeological materials from Eastern Crimea, the conclusion is that the Bosporan Kingdom could most likely have been the apple of discord at that time, which from the end of the 4th century was under the protection of the Huns—Akatzirs, the eastern branch of the nomads who strengthened in the Northern Black Sea area after the fall of the kingdom of Ermanaric. It seems likely that it was in the early 5th century that the Akatzirs were able to defend their independence in alliance with Constantinople under the leadership of Douptounos and hold back the onslaught of the ‘royal’ Huns in the Northern Black Sea region, thus delaying the devastation of the Bosporus.
这项研究的主要目的是了解君士坦丁堡统治圈内的组织的情况,即暗杀哈拉顿的匈奴首领。鉴于这些书面和考古资料,这次冒险的主要原因,也许也是唯一的原因,是巴巴多马不断增加的“沙皇”匈奴人袭击帝国领土。然而,根据希腊-拉丁传统,在408 - 412年期间,匈奴人和君士坦丁堡军队之间没有重大冲突。因此,“沙皇”匈奴人和东罗马帝国之间的关系升级的原因不同。根据对东克里米亚考古资料的分析,当时的争议可能是波斯尼亚王国,它自4世纪末以来一直受到阿卡兹人的保护。五世纪初,在duptuna的领导下,akathira能够与君士坦丁堡结盟,控制住北部郊区的“沙皇”匈奴人的进攻,从而推迟了博斯波尔的毁灭。这门课的主要内容是由康斯坦丁堡的阿坦普特精英组织的。在Barbaricum和帝国土地上的“皇家狩猎力量”,只需要有足够的力量来完成它。However,加入希腊拉丁贸易,这是一个没有签名的米利塔·克拉西,没有签名的米利塔·克拉西。有一种感觉,那是另一种感觉,那是一种感觉。基于on the analysis of纳入材料from the conclusion is that the Eastern krym, Bosporan Kingdom condor most likely have been the apple of discord at that time, from the end of the四维century was under the protection of the Huns Akatzirs、the Eastern branch of the Black Sea nomads who strengthened in the Northern area after the fall of the Kingdom of Ermanaric。It seems likely that It was in the early第五世纪that the Akatzirs were able to defend their independence in alliance with承认under the leadership of Douptounos and hold back the onslaught of the‘皇家Huns in the Northern Black Sea区thus delaying the般的毁灭of the Bosporus。