Socioeconomic changes influence hunter behavior in the northern periphery of Dja Faunal Reserve, Cameroon

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
J. K. Kuenbou, N. Tagg, D. M. Khan, S. Speelman, J. Willie
{"title":"Socioeconomic changes influence hunter behavior in the northern periphery of Dja Faunal Reserve, Cameroon","authors":"J. K. Kuenbou,&nbsp;N. Tagg,&nbsp;D. M. Khan,&nbsp;S. Speelman,&nbsp;J. Willie","doi":"10.1111/acv.12916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The hunter is the key actor in unsustainable hunting of bushmeat in African forests and his behavior is driven by socioeconomic factors among others. However, not much is known about the effectiveness of incentive-based conservation actions providing socioeconomic benefits to reduce hunting. This study, therefore, examined how changes in the socioeconomic situation of hunters brought about by reciprocal environmental agreements affects their hunting behavior. During a project implemented near the Dja Faunal Reserve (Cameroon), we recorded changes in socioeconomic characteristics of hunters for 15 months spanning 3 years. Bushmeat offtake and hunting effort parameters were also recorded. Comparisons of the evolution of these parameters over the years were made between hunters who signed the agreements and those who did not. We found that signatory hunters were older and had larger households than non-signatories, and they earned more income from cocoa sales. Although both groups of hunters had similar characteristics regarding hunting behavior at the start of the project, signatory hunters harvested less bushmeat at the end of project. More time was spent in hunting by non-signatory hunters compared to signatories who hunted less at the end of our monitoring period. Signatory hunters hunted less with firearms than non-signatories, and they consumed more and sold less of their catches compared to non-signatories. This study underlines the importance of reciprocal environmental agreements as an incentive-based conservation scheme that can reduce hunting pressure. These findings show that economic incentives provided to individuals through reciprocal environment agreements can promote livelihood paradigm shifts, alleviating poverty, decreasing dependence on natural resources and benefiting animal conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 4","pages":"437-448"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acv.12916","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The hunter is the key actor in unsustainable hunting of bushmeat in African forests and his behavior is driven by socioeconomic factors among others. However, not much is known about the effectiveness of incentive-based conservation actions providing socioeconomic benefits to reduce hunting. This study, therefore, examined how changes in the socioeconomic situation of hunters brought about by reciprocal environmental agreements affects their hunting behavior. During a project implemented near the Dja Faunal Reserve (Cameroon), we recorded changes in socioeconomic characteristics of hunters for 15 months spanning 3 years. Bushmeat offtake and hunting effort parameters were also recorded. Comparisons of the evolution of these parameters over the years were made between hunters who signed the agreements and those who did not. We found that signatory hunters were older and had larger households than non-signatories, and they earned more income from cocoa sales. Although both groups of hunters had similar characteristics regarding hunting behavior at the start of the project, signatory hunters harvested less bushmeat at the end of project. More time was spent in hunting by non-signatory hunters compared to signatories who hunted less at the end of our monitoring period. Signatory hunters hunted less with firearms than non-signatories, and they consumed more and sold less of their catches compared to non-signatories. This study underlines the importance of reciprocal environmental agreements as an incentive-based conservation scheme that can reduce hunting pressure. These findings show that economic incentives provided to individuals through reciprocal environment agreements can promote livelihood paradigm shifts, alleviating poverty, decreasing dependence on natural resources and benefiting animal conservation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

社会经济变化对喀麦隆 Dja 动物保护区北部周边地区猎人行为的影响
猎人是非洲森林中不可持续的丛林肉类狩猎活动的主要参与者,其行为受社会经济等因素的驱动。然而,人们对提供社会经济利益的激励性保护行动在减少狩猎方面的效果知之甚少。因此,本研究探讨了互惠环境协议对猎人社会经济状况的改变如何影响他们的狩猎行为。在 Dja 动物保护区(喀麦隆)附近实施的一个项目中,我们记录了狩猎者社会经济特征的变化,时间跨度为 15 个月,为期 3 年。我们还记录了野生动物肉类摄取量和狩猎强度参数。我们对签署协议和未签署协议的猎人多年来这些参数的变化情况进行了比较。我们发现,与未签署协议的猎人相比,签署协议的猎人年龄更大、家庭人口更多,他们从可可销售中获得的收入也更多。虽然两组猎人在项目开始时的狩猎行为特征相似,但在项目结束时,签署协议的猎人收获的丛林肉类较少。在监测期结束时,非签约狩猎者的狩猎时间比签约狩猎者长,而签约狩猎者的狩猎时间比非签约狩猎者短。与非签署方相比,签署方猎人使用枪支狩猎的次数更少,与非签署方相比,签署方猎人消耗的猎物更多,出售的猎物更少。这项研究强调了互惠环境协议的重要性,它是一种以激励为基础的保护计划,可以减少狩猎压力。这些研究结果表明,通过互惠环境协议为个人提供经济激励,可以促进生计模式的转变,减轻贫困,减少对自然资源的依赖,有利于动物保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Conservation
Animal Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Conservation provides a forum for rapid publication of novel, peer-reviewed research into the conservation of animal species and their habitats. The focus is on rigorous quantitative studies of an empirical or theoretical nature, which may relate to populations, species or communities and their conservation. We encourage the submission of single-species papers that have clear broader implications for conservation of other species or systems. A central theme is to publish important new ideas of broad interest and with findings that advance the scientific basis of conservation. Subjects covered include population biology, epidemiology, evolutionary ecology, population genetics, biodiversity, biogeography, palaeobiology and conservation economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信