Third-Party Patent Litigation Financing in the United States: Do You Know Who is Sitting in Your Courtroom?

Nikola Dragić
{"title":"Third-Party Patent Litigation Financing in the United States: Do You Know Who is Sitting in Your Courtroom?","authors":"Nikola Dragić","doi":"10.55836/pip_23311a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is to present the current landscape of third-party litigation financing in the United States—namely, patent disputes, as well as a brief insight into the litigation funding business. In the last ten years, patent litigation brought by patent trolls has increased, creating a significant problem. First, this paper explains the basic rules of federal civil procedure that relate to deciding which court will hear a patent case. Next, this paper discusses the Nimitz case before the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, which gained publicity due to the non-disclosure of certain facts by Nimitz’s counsel to the court. Finally, the author recognizes problems raised after the Nimitz case in connection to third-party litigation financing.","PeriodicalId":306662,"journal":{"name":"Pravo i privreda","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravo i privreda","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55836/pip_23311a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to present the current landscape of third-party litigation financing in the United States—namely, patent disputes, as well as a brief insight into the litigation funding business. In the last ten years, patent litigation brought by patent trolls has increased, creating a significant problem. First, this paper explains the basic rules of federal civil procedure that relate to deciding which court will hear a patent case. Next, this paper discusses the Nimitz case before the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, which gained publicity due to the non-disclosure of certain facts by Nimitz’s counsel to the court. Finally, the author recognizes problems raised after the Nimitz case in connection to third-party litigation financing.
美国第三方专利诉讼融资:你知道谁坐在你的法庭上吗?
本文的目的是介绍美国第三方诉讼融资的现状,即专利纠纷,以及对诉讼融资业务的简要了解。在过去的十年里,专利流氓带来的专利诉讼增加了,造成了一个重大问题。首先,本文解释了联邦民事诉讼的基本规则,这些规则与决定哪个法院将审理专利案件有关。接下来,本文讨论了美国特拉华州地方法院审理的尼米兹案件,该案件因尼米兹的律师未向法院披露某些事实而获得了公众的关注。最后,作者认识到尼米兹案之后在第三方诉讼融资方面提出的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信