Pravo člana društva na naknadu refleksne štete: Uporedno-pravna i pozitivno-pravna analiza

Jovana Veličkovic
{"title":"Pravo člana društva na naknadu refleksne štete: Uporedno-pravna i pozitivno-pravna analiza","authors":"Jovana Veličkovic","doi":"10.55836/pip_23307a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the analysis is shareholder’s right to compensation for reflexive loss that occurs in its property due to the deterioration of the action taken against the company. While most rights adopt the so-called principle of prohibition of compensation for reflexive loss, this right is recognized in investment arbitration disputes. The paper aimed to determine the position of Serbian law concerning the observed conflict of rights. In Serbian law, the shareholders may have the right to claim compensation for reflexive loss if such a claim follows the principle of integral compensation for damages. In this respect, Serbian law is more favorable to the approach of tribunals in investment arbitrations than national laws. The approach of Serbian law should be maintained, taking into account all criticisms of the course that recognizes this right of shareholders to achieve the functions of tort and company law ultimately.","PeriodicalId":306662,"journal":{"name":"Pravo i privreda","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravo i privreda","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55836/pip_23307a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of the analysis is shareholder’s right to compensation for reflexive loss that occurs in its property due to the deterioration of the action taken against the company. While most rights adopt the so-called principle of prohibition of compensation for reflexive loss, this right is recognized in investment arbitration disputes. The paper aimed to determine the position of Serbian law concerning the observed conflict of rights. In Serbian law, the shareholders may have the right to claim compensation for reflexive loss if such a claim follows the principle of integral compensation for damages. In this respect, Serbian law is more favorable to the approach of tribunals in investment arbitrations than national laws. The approach of Serbian law should be maintained, taking into account all criticisms of the course that recognizes this right of shareholders to achieve the functions of tort and company law ultimately.
反身状态开始时的社团成员法:中间法和实在法分析
分析的主题是股东对其财产因对公司采取的行动恶化而发生的反射性损失的赔偿权利。虽然多数权利采用的是所谓的禁止补偿自反性损失原则,但这一权利在投资仲裁纠纷中得到了承认。该文件的目的是确定塞尔维亚法律关于已观察到的权利冲突的立场。在塞尔维亚法律中,股东有权要求赔偿自反性损失,如果这种要求遵循损害赔偿的整体赔偿原则。在这方面,塞尔维亚法律在投资仲裁方面比国内法更有利于法庭的做法。应保留塞尔维亚法律的做法,同时考虑到对承认股东有权利最终实现侵权法和公司法职能的方针的所有批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信