Gender equality at stake: women’s strategies, symbolic violence and resistance in Italian boards of directors

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Zenia Simonella, Simona Cuomo
{"title":"Gender equality at stake: women’s strategies, symbolic violence and resistance in Italian boards of directors","authors":"Zenia Simonella, Simona Cuomo","doi":"10.1080/09589236.2023.2258098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTItaly promulgated the ‘Golfo-Mosca Law’ obliging companies to introduce gender quotas on boards of directors. The goal was to analyse whether or to what extent women bring gender equality to boards’ debates as well as men’s reactions following the introduction of quotas. The authors interviewed 100 women directors and 34 men CEOs/Presidents between June 2020 and February 2021, referring to the concepts of ‘critical mass’, ‘symbolic violence’ and ‘post-feminist sensibility’ in order to interpret the data. The analysis shows that gender quotas are considered necessary for modifying boards’ routines. However, the introduction of the gender equality topic in the debate is difficult, also in a critical mass situation, depending on the experience of women within boards. In relation to this, the authors identify strategies adopted by women (‘avoiding’, ‘neutral’ and ‘empowering’) and forms of resistance they encountered within the boards (‘denial’, ‘second class citizenship’, ‘microaggressions’, ‘backlash and gender fatigue’), showing that the potential transformative role of women as board members is variable and limited. Men appear as the guardians of the gendered symbolic order, considering gender equality as a means to enhance companies’ reputations.KEYWORDS: Genderquotasfeminismsymbolic violenceboardItaly Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.DataFor information regarding our data, please contact the corresponding author.Notes1. Each interviewee was adequately informed in relation to the research objectives, the use of data and the respect for personal information and privacy following the ethical guidelines of the authors’ institution.2. Environmental, Social, Governance criteria.Additional informationFundingThe authors would like to thank: Valore D Association as our unique project partner and Generali and McKinsey as our financial sponsors.Notes on contributorsZenia SimonellaZenia Simonella is post-doc research fellow, Dep. Sociology and Social Research, University of Milan-Bicocca and fellow at Diversity, Inclusion & Smart Working Monitor, Sda Bocconi School of Management. Research areas: gender studies, diversity and inclusion management, sociology of knowledge/science, sociology of everyday life, methodology of social sciences.Simona CuomoSimona Cuomo is Associate Professor of Practice of Leadership, Organization & Human Resources and Coordinator of the Diversity, Inclusion & Smart Working Monitor at Sda Bocconi School of Management. Research areas: gender studies, diversity and inclusion management, leadership, team management, remote working.","PeriodicalId":15911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gender Studies","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gender Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2023.2258098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTItaly promulgated the ‘Golfo-Mosca Law’ obliging companies to introduce gender quotas on boards of directors. The goal was to analyse whether or to what extent women bring gender equality to boards’ debates as well as men’s reactions following the introduction of quotas. The authors interviewed 100 women directors and 34 men CEOs/Presidents between June 2020 and February 2021, referring to the concepts of ‘critical mass’, ‘symbolic violence’ and ‘post-feminist sensibility’ in order to interpret the data. The analysis shows that gender quotas are considered necessary for modifying boards’ routines. However, the introduction of the gender equality topic in the debate is difficult, also in a critical mass situation, depending on the experience of women within boards. In relation to this, the authors identify strategies adopted by women (‘avoiding’, ‘neutral’ and ‘empowering’) and forms of resistance they encountered within the boards (‘denial’, ‘second class citizenship’, ‘microaggressions’, ‘backlash and gender fatigue’), showing that the potential transformative role of women as board members is variable and limited. Men appear as the guardians of the gendered symbolic order, considering gender equality as a means to enhance companies’ reputations.KEYWORDS: Genderquotasfeminismsymbolic violenceboardItaly Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.DataFor information regarding our data, please contact the corresponding author.Notes1. Each interviewee was adequately informed in relation to the research objectives, the use of data and the respect for personal information and privacy following the ethical guidelines of the authors’ institution.2. Environmental, Social, Governance criteria.Additional informationFundingThe authors would like to thank: Valore D Association as our unique project partner and Generali and McKinsey as our financial sponsors.Notes on contributorsZenia SimonellaZenia Simonella is post-doc research fellow, Dep. Sociology and Social Research, University of Milan-Bicocca and fellow at Diversity, Inclusion & Smart Working Monitor, Sda Bocconi School of Management. Research areas: gender studies, diversity and inclusion management, sociology of knowledge/science, sociology of everyday life, methodology of social sciences.Simona CuomoSimona Cuomo is Associate Professor of Practice of Leadership, Organization & Human Resources and Coordinator of the Diversity, Inclusion & Smart Working Monitor at Sda Bocconi School of Management. Research areas: gender studies, diversity and inclusion management, leadership, team management, remote working.
危在旦夕的性别平等:意大利董事会中的女性战略、象征性暴力和抵抗
抽象地颁布了“Golfo-Mosca法”,要求公司在董事会中引入性别配额。目的是分析女性是否或在多大程度上将性别平等带入董事会的辩论,以及男性在引入配额后的反应。作者在2020年6月至2021年2月期间采访了100名女性董事和34名男性首席执行官/总裁,提到了“临界质量”、“象征性暴力”和“后女权主义敏感性”等概念,以解释这些数据。分析显示,性别配额被认为是修改董事会惯例的必要条件。然而,在辩论中引入性别平等话题是困难的,也是在关键的群众情况下,这取决于董事会中女性的经验。与此相关,作者确定了女性采取的策略(“避免”、“中立”和“授权”)以及她们在董事会中遇到的抵制形式(“否认”、“二等公民”、“微侵犯”、“反弹和性别疲劳”),表明女性作为董事会成员的潜在变革作用是可变的和有限的。男性似乎是性别象征秩序的守护者,认为性别平等是提高公司声誉的一种手段。关键词:性别配额、女权主义、象征性暴力、意大利披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。关于我们的数据,请联系相应的作者。每位受访者都被充分告知研究目标、数据的使用以及遵守作者所在机构的道德准则对个人信息和隐私的尊重。环境、社会、治理标准。作者要感谢:Valore D协会是我们唯一的项目合作伙伴,忠利和麦肯锡是我们的财务赞助商。作者简介zenia Simonella,米兰比可卡大学社会学与社会研究副博士后研究员,博科尼管理学院多样性、包容性与智能工作监控研究员。研究领域:性别研究、多样性与包容性管理、知识/科学社会学、日常生活社会学、社会科学方法论。西蒙娜·库莫,博科尼管理学院领导实践、组织与人力资源副教授,多样性、包容性和智能工作监测协调员。研究领域:性别研究、多元化和包容性管理、领导力、团队管理、远程工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gender Studies is an interdisciplinary journal which publishes articles relating to gender from a feminist perspective covering a wide range of subject areas including the Social and Natural Sciences, Arts and Popular Culture. Reviews of books and details of forthcoming conferences are also included. The Journal of Gender Studies seeks articles from international sources and aims to take account of a diversity of cultural backgrounds and differences in sexual orientation. It encourages contributions which focus on the experiences of both women and men and welcomes articles, written from a feminist perspective, relating to femininity and masculinity and to the social constructions of relationships between men and women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信