Pravna (ne)osnovanost naknade za održavanje bankarskog tekućeg računa

Svetislav Janković
{"title":"Pravna (ne)osnovanost naknade za održavanje bankarskog tekućeg računa","authors":"Svetislav Janković","doi":"10.55836/pip_23304a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article, the author considers the justifiability of banks’ right to charge the client with the basic costs and fees regarding the banking current account. Although it seems fair that the bank has the right to a maintenance fee and provision, after reviewing the legal nature of bank current account, the author concludes converse. It is particularly present in the case of M-Banking where the client completely autonomously creates and performs the payment order. This is because the client does it on its own mobile phone or PC with his own actions and not the bank’s servants’ actions. Therefore, it seems fair to deprive the bank of this right in favor of its client, or if one wants to be more equitable, to entitle the bank with the aforementioned rights, but at the same time to entitle the client with a right to interest on his positive balance.","PeriodicalId":306662,"journal":{"name":"Pravo i privreda","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravo i privreda","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55836/pip_23304a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article, the author considers the justifiability of banks’ right to charge the client with the basic costs and fees regarding the banking current account. Although it seems fair that the bank has the right to a maintenance fee and provision, after reviewing the legal nature of bank current account, the author concludes converse. It is particularly present in the case of M-Banking where the client completely autonomously creates and performs the payment order. This is because the client does it on its own mobile phone or PC with his own actions and not the bank’s servants’ actions. Therefore, it seems fair to deprive the bank of this right in favor of its client, or if one wants to be more equitable, to entitle the bank with the aforementioned rights, but at the same time to entitle the client with a right to interest on his positive balance.
开立银行往来账户意图的法律(无效)性
本文对银行向客户收取银行往来账户基本费用的正当性进行了探讨。虽然银行享有维护费用和准备金的权利似乎是公平的,但在对银行往来账户的法律性质进行审查后,笔者得出了相反的结论。在移动银行的情况下,客户端完全自主地创建和执行支付订单,这一点尤其突出。这是因为客户是在自己的手机或电脑上用自己的动作来完成的,而不是银行的工作人员的动作。因此,剥夺银行的这一权利有利于其客户似乎是公平的,或者如果想要更公平,赋予银行上述权利,但同时赋予客户从其正余额中获得利息的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信