Digital methods in memory studies: A beginner’s guide to scalable reading of Twitter data

IF 1.4 2区 心理学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES
Helle Strandgaard Jensen, Josephine Møller Jensen, Alexander Ulrich Thygesen, Max Odsbjerg Pedersen
{"title":"Digital methods in memory studies: A beginner’s guide to scalable reading of Twitter data","authors":"Helle Strandgaard Jensen, Josephine Møller Jensen, Alexander Ulrich Thygesen, Max Odsbjerg Pedersen","doi":"10.1177/17506980231197126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article makes a methodological contribution to the growing subfield of digital memory studies. It demonstrates a possible way forward for memory studies scholars who want to try out digital methods but also remain in conversation with the kinds of research traditionally produced within the field. The article revolves around a showcase of an analytical workflow for conducting a scalable reading of large quantities of tweets through access to the Twitter API. The article argues that using only basic computational approaches to social media data in combination with API access can drastically improve data collection practices and enrich analytical practices, producing results recognizable and compatible with existing research in memory studies. As a case study, the article uses a dataset of nearly 200,000 tweets collected around two events that prompted Twitter users to discuss the history of the American children’s television program Sesame Street. It does so to demonstrate: first, how a visualization focusing on chronology can help underpin arguments about heightened activity around certain events. Second, a close reading of selected tweets from these events can support claims of shared activity, even if no hashtags were used. And third, how using simple tools for distant reading makes it possible to converse with questions and issues about gatekeepers and connectivity already central within memory studies. Furthermore, the article demonstrates how the Twitter API supports a more systematical, large-scale collection of tweets than usually seen in memory studies, making researchers less dependent on the algorithmic bias that rules the search in the platform’s regular interface.","PeriodicalId":47104,"journal":{"name":"Memory Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980231197126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article makes a methodological contribution to the growing subfield of digital memory studies. It demonstrates a possible way forward for memory studies scholars who want to try out digital methods but also remain in conversation with the kinds of research traditionally produced within the field. The article revolves around a showcase of an analytical workflow for conducting a scalable reading of large quantities of tweets through access to the Twitter API. The article argues that using only basic computational approaches to social media data in combination with API access can drastically improve data collection practices and enrich analytical practices, producing results recognizable and compatible with existing research in memory studies. As a case study, the article uses a dataset of nearly 200,000 tweets collected around two events that prompted Twitter users to discuss the history of the American children’s television program Sesame Street. It does so to demonstrate: first, how a visualization focusing on chronology can help underpin arguments about heightened activity around certain events. Second, a close reading of selected tweets from these events can support claims of shared activity, even if no hashtags were used. And third, how using simple tools for distant reading makes it possible to converse with questions and issues about gatekeepers and connectivity already central within memory studies. Furthermore, the article demonstrates how the Twitter API supports a more systematical, large-scale collection of tweets than usually seen in memory studies, making researchers less dependent on the algorithmic bias that rules the search in the platform’s regular interface.
记忆研究中的数字方法:Twitter数据可扩展阅读的初学者指南
这篇文章对数字记忆研究这个不断发展的分支领域做出了方法论上的贡献。它为记忆研究学者们展示了一条可能的前进道路,他们既想尝试数字方法,又想与该领域传统的研究保持联系。本文将展示通过访问Twitter API对大量tweet进行可伸缩阅读的分析工作流。文章认为,仅使用基本的计算方法结合API访问社交媒体数据可以极大地改善数据收集实践,丰富分析实践,产生可识别的结果,并与现有的记忆研究相兼容。作为一个案例研究,这篇文章使用了一个由近20万条推文组成的数据集,这些推文是围绕两个事件收集的,这两个事件促使推特用户讨论美国儿童电视节目《芝麻街》的历史。它这样做是为了证明:首先,关注时间顺序的可视化如何有助于支持围绕某些事件的活动加剧的论点。其次,仔细阅读这些事件中选定的推文,可以支持共享活动的说法,即使没有使用标签。第三,如何使用简单的工具进行远程阅读,使人们能够讨论关于守门人和连通性的问题和问题,这些问题和问题已经成为记忆研究的核心。此外,本文还演示了Twitter API如何支持比记忆研究中通常看到的更系统、更大规模的tweet集合,使研究人员更少地依赖于在平台常规界面中统治搜索的算法偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memory Studies
Memory Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Memory Studies is an international peer reviewed journal. Memory Studies affords recognition, form, and direction to work in this nascent field, and provides a critical forum for dialogue and debate on the theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues central to a collaborative understanding of memory today. Memory Studies examines the social, cultural, cognitive, political and technological shifts affecting how, what and why individuals, groups and societies remember, and forget. The journal responds to and seeks to shape public and academic discourse on the nature, manipulation, and contestation of memory in the contemporary era.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信