Prevalence of moderate and severe asymptomatic extracranial carotid disease in patients with peripheral artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 0.2 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Renato MANZIONI, Marcos R. GODOY, Rafael de ATHAYDE SOARES, Marcelo F. MATIELO, Roberto SACILOTTO
{"title":"Prevalence of moderate and severe asymptomatic extracranial carotid disease in patients with peripheral artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Renato MANZIONI, Marcos R. GODOY, Rafael de ATHAYDE SOARES, Marcelo F. MATIELO, Roberto SACILOTTO","doi":"10.23736/s1824-4777.23.01586-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Cerebrovascular accidents are the third biggest cause of death in the West. Ischemic stroke mortality may reach 33% with a 20% recurrence rate in the first year. Thus, identifying patients with asymptomatic extracranial carotid disease (AECD) before cerebral ischemia is of great importance to public health concerns. The paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of AECD occurrence in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review following designated protocols from “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis” (PRISMA), encompassing research in the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane and Embase data banks. A rigorous evaluation process was concluded with the outcome being the presence of AECD on more than 50% of PAD patients. Nine studies with a total of 114,514 patients were included: 3 prospective studies, 4 retrospective studies, 2 transversal studies were selected for meta-analysis. The stenosis proportion higher than 50% AECD was of 22% with a 95% confidence interval between 16% and 29%; however, its heterogeneity was of I2=98%. Symmetry was identified on funnel plot studies.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The systematic review spanning the last 13 years and the meta-analysis have shown a prevalence of 22% AECD>50% in patients with PAD, leading to reasonable concern over AECD in PAD patients.CONCLUSIONS: However, the heterogeneity within the studies was elevated, probably due to differences in carotid stenosis ultrasound diagnosis procedures among one another.","PeriodicalId":54914,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":"166 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/s1824-4777.23.01586-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cerebrovascular accidents are the third biggest cause of death in the West. Ischemic stroke mortality may reach 33% with a 20% recurrence rate in the first year. Thus, identifying patients with asymptomatic extracranial carotid disease (AECD) before cerebral ischemia is of great importance to public health concerns. The paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of AECD occurrence in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review following designated protocols from “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis” (PRISMA), encompassing research in the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane and Embase data banks. A rigorous evaluation process was concluded with the outcome being the presence of AECD on more than 50% of PAD patients. Nine studies with a total of 114,514 patients were included: 3 prospective studies, 4 retrospective studies, 2 transversal studies were selected for meta-analysis. The stenosis proportion higher than 50% AECD was of 22% with a 95% confidence interval between 16% and 29%; however, its heterogeneity was of I2=98%. Symmetry was identified on funnel plot studies.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The systematic review spanning the last 13 years and the meta-analysis have shown a prevalence of 22% AECD>50% in patients with PAD, leading to reasonable concern over AECD in PAD patients.CONCLUSIONS: However, the heterogeneity within the studies was elevated, probably due to differences in carotid stenosis ultrasound diagnosis procedures among one another.
外周动脉疾病患者中重度无症状颈外动脉疾病的患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析
导言:脑血管意外是西方第三大死亡原因。缺血性脑卒中死亡率可达33%,第一年复发率为20%。因此,在脑缺血前识别无症状颈动脉外病变(AECD)患者对公共卫生问题具有重要意义。本文对外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者AECD的发生进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。证据获取:根据“系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目”(PRISMA)指定的方案进行系统评价,包括PubMed、Medline、Cochrane和Embase数据库中的研究。严格的评估过程得出结论,结果是超过50%的PAD患者存在AECD。纳入9项研究,共114,514例患者:3项前瞻性研究,4项回顾性研究,2项横向研究进行meta分析。AECD≥50%的狭窄比例为22%,95%可信区间为16% ~ 29%;但异质性为I2=98%。在漏斗图研究中发现了对称性。证据综合:过去13年的系统评价和荟萃分析显示,PAD患者中AECD的患病率为22% >50%,导致对PAD患者AECD的合理关注。结论:然而,研究中的异质性升高,可能是由于颈动脉狭窄超声诊断程序的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery publishes scientific papers on vascular surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信