Modeling complex problems by harnessing the collective intelligence of local experts: New approaches in fuzzy cognitive mapping

CB Knox, Steven Gray, Mahdi Zareei, Chelsea Wentworth, Payam Aminpour, Renee V Wallace, Jennifer Hodbod, Nathan Brugnone
{"title":"Modeling complex problems by harnessing the collective intelligence of local experts: New approaches in fuzzy cognitive mapping","authors":"CB Knox, Steven Gray, Mahdi Zareei, Chelsea Wentworth, Payam Aminpour, Renee V Wallace, Jennifer Hodbod, Nathan Brugnone","doi":"10.1177/26339137231203582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developing system understanding and testing interventions are critical steps to addressing wicked problems. Fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM) can be a useful participatory modeling tool that enables aggregation of individual perspectives to build system models that represent groups’ collective intelligence (CI). However, current FCM aggregation methodologies for creating CI models have rarely been tested and compared. We conducted 51 FCM interviews with local experts in the Flint, MI food system to map their mental models about how different food system sectors influenced desirable outcomes. Using four differing aggregation techniques, based on experts’ identity diversity and cognitive diversity, we generated four CI models. The models were compared based on their similarity to real-world complex systems using performance metrics like network structure, micro-motifs, cognitive distance, and scenario outcomes. We found that using cognitive diversity to group individuals was better suited for modeling systems with diverse holders of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":93948,"journal":{"name":"Collective intelligence","volume":"165 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collective intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137231203582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developing system understanding and testing interventions are critical steps to addressing wicked problems. Fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM) can be a useful participatory modeling tool that enables aggregation of individual perspectives to build system models that represent groups’ collective intelligence (CI). However, current FCM aggregation methodologies for creating CI models have rarely been tested and compared. We conducted 51 FCM interviews with local experts in the Flint, MI food system to map their mental models about how different food system sectors influenced desirable outcomes. Using four differing aggregation techniques, based on experts’ identity diversity and cognitive diversity, we generated four CI models. The models were compared based on their similarity to real-world complex systems using performance metrics like network structure, micro-motifs, cognitive distance, and scenario outcomes. We found that using cognitive diversity to group individuals was better suited for modeling systems with diverse holders of knowledge.
利用当地专家的集体智慧为复杂问题建模:模糊认知映射的新方法
发展系统理解和测试干预措施是解决棘手问题的关键步骤。模糊认知映射(FCM)是一种有用的参与式建模工具,它可以聚合个人视角来构建代表群体集体智慧(CI)的系统模型。然而,目前用于创建CI模型的FCM聚合方法很少被测试和比较。我们对密歇根州弗林特食品系统的当地专家进行了51次FCM访谈,以绘制他们关于不同食品系统部门如何影响理想结果的心理模型。基于专家的身份多样性和认知多样性,采用四种不同的聚合技术,生成了四种CI模型。通过网络结构、微主题、认知距离和场景结果等性能指标,对模型与现实世界复杂系统的相似性进行了比较。我们发现,使用认知多样性对个体进行分组更适合于具有不同知识持有者的系统建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信