The rapid development of a virtual Children’s Hearings System in Scotland: A realist-inspired synthesis assessing the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the participation and rights of children

Catherine Nixon, Indiya Kurlus, Melissa Hunt, Kirsty Deacon, Sarah McGarrol, Donald Lamb, Helen Etchells, Lorna McNaughton, Gillian Henderson
{"title":"The rapid development of a virtual Children’s Hearings System in Scotland: A realist-inspired synthesis assessing the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the participation and rights of children","authors":"Catherine Nixon, Indiya Kurlus, Melissa Hunt, Kirsty Deacon, Sarah McGarrol, Donald Lamb, Helen Etchells, Lorna McNaughton, Gillian Henderson","doi":"10.1177/03085759231197229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scotland’s Children’s Hearings System is a unique statutory system that makes decisions about the need for compulsory professional involvement in the lives of children who are maltreated, in conflict with the law or displaying alarming behaviours. It was designed to facilitate in-person, child-centred discussions about the measures needed to ensure the care and protection of children. The Covid-19 pandemic challenged the ability of the Hearings System to fulfil this role due to the physical closure of Hearings Centres and the need to rapidly develop a virtual system. In this paper we present a realist-influenced synthesis exploring how contextual factors such as public health guidelines, emergency legislation, technological challenges and wider structural inequalities interacted with the delivery of virtual hearings to affect the participation and rights of children during the pandemic. We also describe how learning from the experiences of the participants of hearings was critical to understanding how virtual technologies could be adapted to provide a more rights-respecting approach to participation. We conclude by arguing that there is a need to ensure that the voices of children, which are largely absent from discussions around the use of virtual technologies, are incorporated into decisions made about their continued use within Children’s Hearings.","PeriodicalId":92743,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & fostering","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & fostering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03085759231197229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scotland’s Children’s Hearings System is a unique statutory system that makes decisions about the need for compulsory professional involvement in the lives of children who are maltreated, in conflict with the law or displaying alarming behaviours. It was designed to facilitate in-person, child-centred discussions about the measures needed to ensure the care and protection of children. The Covid-19 pandemic challenged the ability of the Hearings System to fulfil this role due to the physical closure of Hearings Centres and the need to rapidly develop a virtual system. In this paper we present a realist-influenced synthesis exploring how contextual factors such as public health guidelines, emergency legislation, technological challenges and wider structural inequalities interacted with the delivery of virtual hearings to affect the participation and rights of children during the pandemic. We also describe how learning from the experiences of the participants of hearings was critical to understanding how virtual technologies could be adapted to provide a more rights-respecting approach to participation. We conclude by arguing that there is a need to ensure that the voices of children, which are largely absent from discussions around the use of virtual technologies, are incorporated into decisions made about their continued use within Children’s Hearings.
苏格兰虚拟儿童听证会系统的快速发展:基于现实主义的综合评估Covid-19大流行对儿童参与和权利的影响
苏格兰的儿童听证制度是一个独特的法定制度,它决定是否需要强制性的专业人员参与到受虐待、违反法律或表现出惊人行为的儿童的生活中。它的目的是促进以儿童为中心的面对面讨论,讨论确保照顾和保护儿童所需的措施。2019冠状病毒病大流行对听证系统履行这一作用的能力提出了挑战,因为听证中心实际关闭,需要迅速开发一个虚拟系统。在本文中,我们提出了一种现实主义影响的综合方法,探讨公共卫生准则、紧急立法、技术挑战和更广泛的结构性不平等等背景因素如何与虚拟听证会的提供相互作用,从而影响大流行期间儿童的参与和权利。我们还描述了从听证会参与者的经验中学习如何对理解如何调整虚拟技术以提供更尊重权利的参与方式至关重要。我们的结论是,有必要确保在儿童听证会中继续使用虚拟技术的决定中纳入儿童的声音,而儿童的声音在围绕虚拟技术使用的讨论中基本上是缺席的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信