Measuring KVK-led Fisheries Extension Efforts in Haryana and Punjab: Insights and Interventions

Naila Majid Bhat, Ananthan Pachampalayam Shanmugam, Kuppusamy Ponnusamy, Ashish Santosh Murai, Shivaji Dadabhau Argade, Neha Wajahat Qureshi, Periyasamy Seenivasan
{"title":"Measuring KVK-led Fisheries Extension Efforts in Haryana and Punjab: Insights and Interventions","authors":"Naila Majid Bhat, Ananthan Pachampalayam Shanmugam, Kuppusamy Ponnusamy, Ashish Santosh Murai, Shivaji Dadabhau Argade, Neha Wajahat Qureshi, Periyasamy Seenivasan","doi":"10.48165/ijee.2023.59403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"KVKs have proved to be dynamic agents of agricultural development but their role and potential contribution for fisheries development is less known. This study, conducted in 2023, quantifies fisheries extension efforts of all 22 KVKs in Punjab and 19 KVKs in Haryana. The study relied on secondary data sourced from annual reports of ATARI Ludhiana, ATARI-Jodhpur, ICAR-KVK portal, individual KVK websites as well as primary data collected from KVK-SMS in all districts using a structured online survey, besides field visits to few KVKs. A novel methodology, the KVK-Fisheries Extension Intensity Index (FEII) consisting of 5 dimensions (human resource, infrastructure, budget, fisheries extension activities, and digital outreach), was used to quantify the KVKs’ extension effort. The average FEI scores were 33 per cent for Haryana KVKs and 36 per cent for Punjab KVKs with none of the 41 KVKs having high FEI (>66%), clearly indicating inadequate attention to fisheries by KVKs. Nearly two-thirds of KVKs in Punjab (68%) and in Haryana (58%) had moderate FEI scores. The absence of fisheries SMS and fisheries infrastructure in all, but 5 KVKs in the two states were primary reasons for poor extension effort which needs speedy redressal.","PeriodicalId":13471,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Extension Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Extension Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48165/ijee.2023.59403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

KVKs have proved to be dynamic agents of agricultural development but their role and potential contribution for fisheries development is less known. This study, conducted in 2023, quantifies fisheries extension efforts of all 22 KVKs in Punjab and 19 KVKs in Haryana. The study relied on secondary data sourced from annual reports of ATARI Ludhiana, ATARI-Jodhpur, ICAR-KVK portal, individual KVK websites as well as primary data collected from KVK-SMS in all districts using a structured online survey, besides field visits to few KVKs. A novel methodology, the KVK-Fisheries Extension Intensity Index (FEII) consisting of 5 dimensions (human resource, infrastructure, budget, fisheries extension activities, and digital outreach), was used to quantify the KVKs’ extension effort. The average FEI scores were 33 per cent for Haryana KVKs and 36 per cent for Punjab KVKs with none of the 41 KVKs having high FEI (>66%), clearly indicating inadequate attention to fisheries by KVKs. Nearly two-thirds of KVKs in Punjab (68%) and in Haryana (58%) had moderate FEI scores. The absence of fisheries SMS and fisheries infrastructure in all, but 5 KVKs in the two states were primary reasons for poor extension effort which needs speedy redressal.
衡量哈里亚纳邦和旁遮普邦kvk主导的渔业推广工作:见解和干预措施
KVKs已被证明是农业发展的有力推动者,但它们对渔业发展的作用和潜在贡献却鲜为人知。这项研究于2023年进行,量化了旁遮普邦所有22个kvk和哈里亚纳邦19个kvk的渔业推广工作。该研究依靠的二手数据来自雅达利卢迪亚纳、雅达利-杰特布尔、ICAR-KVK门户网站、个别KVK网站的年度报告,以及通过结构化在线调查从所有地区的KVK- sms收集的主要数据,此外还对少数KVK进行了实地访问。采用一种新颖的方法,即由5个维度(人力资源、基础设施、预算、渔业推广活动和数字推广)组成的kvk -渔业推广强度指数(FEII)来量化kvk的推广工作。哈里亚纳邦KVKs的平均FEI分数为33%,旁遮普KVKs的平均FEI分数为36%,41个KVKs中没有一个具有高FEI (>66%),清楚地表明KVKs对渔业的关注不足。在旁遮普(68%)和哈里亚纳邦(58%),近三分之二的kvk的FEI得分中等。这两个邦缺少渔业SMS和渔业基础设施,但有5个kvk,这是推广工作不力的主要原因,需要迅速纠正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信