Decamping the Partisans: US Hegemony and South Korea's Divisive Discourse on North Korean Human Rights

IF 0.3 0 ASIAN STUDIES
{"title":"Decamping the Partisans: US Hegemony and South Korea's Divisive Discourse on North Korean Human Rights","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/ks.2023.a908622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The question of what to do about North Korean human rights (NKHR) has never been more divisive. Some have explained the division in terms of prioritizing certain rights or movement strategies over others. In this paper, I demonstrate that neither of these explanations is consistent with the last three decades of South Korean public discourse on NKHR. Applying a novel combination of semantic network and discourse analysis on 28,795 South Korean newspaper articles between 1990 and 2016, I arrive at the following argument. The division between NKHR partisans in South Korea is not based on particular stances towards human rights but rather support or opposition to US hegemony and intervention on the Korean peninsula. South Korean partisanship is worth studying as a specific aspect of the NKHR Movement, and because it reflects more generally on NKHR partisanship in the West. We in the NHKR community will be far more effective at improving the actual state of North Korean human rights if we first acknowledge and address our fundamental disagreements over US hegemony and intervention on the Korean peninsula. Lastly, this paper makes a methodological contribution to digital humanities. I use semantic network analysis to visualize partisan dynamics within a corpus of media articles spanning a quarter century. I then sample the most representative articles comprising key network features and use these to conduct a qualitative discourse analysis. It is my hope that future research in Korean Studies will benefit from this complementary application of digital and qualitative methods.","PeriodicalId":43382,"journal":{"name":"Korean Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ks.2023.a908622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The question of what to do about North Korean human rights (NKHR) has never been more divisive. Some have explained the division in terms of prioritizing certain rights or movement strategies over others. In this paper, I demonstrate that neither of these explanations is consistent with the last three decades of South Korean public discourse on NKHR. Applying a novel combination of semantic network and discourse analysis on 28,795 South Korean newspaper articles between 1990 and 2016, I arrive at the following argument. The division between NKHR partisans in South Korea is not based on particular stances towards human rights but rather support or opposition to US hegemony and intervention on the Korean peninsula. South Korean partisanship is worth studying as a specific aspect of the NKHR Movement, and because it reflects more generally on NKHR partisanship in the West. We in the NHKR community will be far more effective at improving the actual state of North Korean human rights if we first acknowledge and address our fundamental disagreements over US hegemony and intervention on the Korean peninsula. Lastly, this paper makes a methodological contribution to digital humanities. I use semantic network analysis to visualize partisan dynamics within a corpus of media articles spanning a quarter century. I then sample the most representative articles comprising key network features and use these to conduct a qualitative discourse analysis. It is my hope that future research in Korean Studies will benefit from this complementary application of digital and qualitative methods.
退出游击队:美国霸权与韩国在朝鲜人权问题上的分裂话语
摘要:如何解决朝鲜人权问题从来没有像现在这样存在分歧。一些人解释说,这种划分是根据优先考虑某些权利或运动策略而不是其他权利。在本文中,我证明了这两种解释都与过去三十年韩国关于NKHR的公共话语不一致。通过对1990年至2016年间28,795篇韩国报纸文章进行语义网络和话语分析的新颖组合,我得出了以下论点。在韩国国内,NKHR派系之间的分歧不是基于对人权的特定立场,而是基于对美国霸权主义和韩半岛干涉的支持或反对。作为NKHR运动的一个特定方面,韩国的党派关系值得研究,因为它更普遍地反映了西方NKHR的党派关系。如果我们首先承认并解决我们在美国霸权和干预朝鲜半岛问题上的根本分歧,那么我们在NHKR社区将更有效地改善朝鲜的实际人权状况。最后,本文对数字人文学科做出了方法论上的贡献。我使用语义网络分析来可视化跨越四分之一个世纪的媒体文章语料库中的党派动态。然后,我对包含关键网络特征的最具代表性的文章进行抽样,并使用这些文章进行定性话语分析。我希望未来的韩国研究将受益于这种数字和定性方法的互补应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Studies
Korean Studies ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信