Are Basel-III norms good for Indian banks? Examining performance, efficiency and resilience variance in private-sector and public-sector banks

IF 1.8 Q2 ECONOMICS
Megha Jaiwani, Santosh Gopalkrishnan
{"title":"Are Basel-III norms good for Indian banks? Examining performance, efficiency and resilience variance in private-sector and public-sector banks","authors":"Megha Jaiwani, Santosh Gopalkrishnan","doi":"10.1108/jeas-05-2023-0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The study examines whether the Basel-III regulations impact the financial performance, operational efficiency and resilience of Indian banks. Further, the study tests whether there is a variance in the impact between private- and public-sector banks. Design/methodology/approach The study uses panel data regression on data from 16 private- and 12 public-sector banks from the years 2016–2022. Random-effect estimation is used, and robust standard errors are calculated. Findings The main findings indicate that the Basel-III regulations related to capital and leverage boost public-sector banks' financial performance and resilience. However, a similar impact is not detected in the case of private-sector banks. Practical implications The findings signify that the Basel-III framework does not address the differences between public and private-sector banks. Therefore, the policy implications are of practical importance and indicate that Basel-III regulations should not be considered a one-size-fits-all type of bank. Instead, policymakers should consider the structural differences between private and public-sector banks concerning Basel-III regulations. Originality/value The study addresses a significant limitation of the Basel-III regulations, which, in their current state, somehow fail to account for the differences between the public- and private-sector banks.","PeriodicalId":44018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-05-2023-0129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The study examines whether the Basel-III regulations impact the financial performance, operational efficiency and resilience of Indian banks. Further, the study tests whether there is a variance in the impact between private- and public-sector banks. Design/methodology/approach The study uses panel data regression on data from 16 private- and 12 public-sector banks from the years 2016–2022. Random-effect estimation is used, and robust standard errors are calculated. Findings The main findings indicate that the Basel-III regulations related to capital and leverage boost public-sector banks' financial performance and resilience. However, a similar impact is not detected in the case of private-sector banks. Practical implications The findings signify that the Basel-III framework does not address the differences between public and private-sector banks. Therefore, the policy implications are of practical importance and indicate that Basel-III regulations should not be considered a one-size-fits-all type of bank. Instead, policymakers should consider the structural differences between private and public-sector banks concerning Basel-III regulations. Originality/value The study addresses a significant limitation of the Basel-III regulations, which, in their current state, somehow fail to account for the differences between the public- and private-sector banks.
巴塞尔协议iii对印度银行有利吗?考察私营部门和公共部门银行的绩效、效率和弹性差异
本研究考察了巴塞尔iii法规是否会影响印度银行的财务绩效、运营效率和弹性。此外,该研究还测试了私营银行和公共银行之间的影响是否存在差异。该研究对2016-2022年间16家私营银行和12家公共银行的数据进行了面板数据回归。采用随机效应估计,计算鲁棒标准误差。主要研究结果表明,与资本和杠杆相关的巴塞尔iii法规提高了公共部门银行的财务绩效和抗风险能力。然而,在私营银行的情况下,没有发现类似的影响。研究结果表明,巴塞尔协议iii框架没有解决公共银行和私营银行之间的差异。因此,政策含义具有实际重要性,并表明巴塞尔iii法规不应被视为一刀切的银行类型。相反,政策制定者应该考虑私人银行和公共银行在巴塞尔协议iii监管方面的结构性差异。该研究解决了巴塞尔协议iii规定的一个重大局限性,即在目前的状态下,该规定在某种程度上未能考虑到公共银行和私营银行之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
83
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信