The effects of different wing configurations on missile aerodynamics

IF 1.1 Q3 Engineering
Ahmet ŞUMNU, İbrahim GÜZELBEY
{"title":"The effects of different wing configurations on missile aerodynamics","authors":"Ahmet ŞUMNU, İbrahim GÜZELBEY","doi":"10.18186/thermal.1377200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present study, missile aerodynamic analysis is performed using different wing config-urations at subsonic and transonic speeds. The wing is critical component in point of aero-dynamic efficiency for a missile that speed is especially closer to transonic level because of flow separation. Flow on the wings may adversely effect tailfins of missile at high speed since it may cause vortex generation and flow disturbances. There are few studies that investigate the missile wing using different configurations at critical speeds when examined the previ-ous studies. Therefore, in this study, three different wing configurations are investigated and aerodynamic performance is compared with each other at 0.7 and 0.9 Mach numbers and 5° angle of attack (AoA). In beginning of this study, missile model with only tailfins is selected from previous study that contains experimental data. Because the experimental data for the selected missile model are available at supersonic speeds, the aerodynamic analysis to verify the solutions is carried out at supersonic speeds. After wing is mounted to the selected missile, aerodynamic analysis is carried out using three different wing configurations that are Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered wings. Lift to drag ratio (CL/CD) is calculated to compare wing configurations and it is concluded that Tapered Leading Edge wing configuration shows higher performance then other wing configurations. CL/CD values are 2.327, 2.306, 2.303 at 0.7 Mach number and 2.45, 2.429, 2.423 at 0.9 Mach number for Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered, respectively. When the results are compared each other, CL/CD values at 0.9 Mach number is higher about % 5.28, %5.33 and %5.21 than the CL/CD values at 0.7 Mach number for missile with Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered, respectively.","PeriodicalId":45841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thermal Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.1377200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, missile aerodynamic analysis is performed using different wing config-urations at subsonic and transonic speeds. The wing is critical component in point of aero-dynamic efficiency for a missile that speed is especially closer to transonic level because of flow separation. Flow on the wings may adversely effect tailfins of missile at high speed since it may cause vortex generation and flow disturbances. There are few studies that investigate the missile wing using different configurations at critical speeds when examined the previ-ous studies. Therefore, in this study, three different wing configurations are investigated and aerodynamic performance is compared with each other at 0.7 and 0.9 Mach numbers and 5° angle of attack (AoA). In beginning of this study, missile model with only tailfins is selected from previous study that contains experimental data. Because the experimental data for the selected missile model are available at supersonic speeds, the aerodynamic analysis to verify the solutions is carried out at supersonic speeds. After wing is mounted to the selected missile, aerodynamic analysis is carried out using three different wing configurations that are Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered wings. Lift to drag ratio (CL/CD) is calculated to compare wing configurations and it is concluded that Tapered Leading Edge wing configuration shows higher performance then other wing configurations. CL/CD values are 2.327, 2.306, 2.303 at 0.7 Mach number and 2.45, 2.429, 2.423 at 0.9 Mach number for Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered, respectively. When the results are compared each other, CL/CD values at 0.9 Mach number is higher about % 5.28, %5.33 and %5.21 than the CL/CD values at 0.7 Mach number for missile with Tapered Leading Edge, Tapered Trailing Edge, and Double Tapered, respectively.
不同翼型对导弹空气动力学的影响
在本研究中,采用亚音速和跨音速下不同的机翼构型进行了导弹气动分析。对于速度特别接近跨声速水平的导弹来说,机翼是气动效率的关键部件。在高速飞行时,机翼上的气流会对导弹尾翼产生不利的影响,因为它会产生涡流和流动扰动。在以往的研究中,很少有研究在临界速度下使用不同构型的导弹机翼。因此,在本研究中,研究了三种不同的机翼构型,并在0.7和0.9马赫数和5°攻角(AoA)下对气动性能进行了比较。在本研究开始时,选取了前人研究中包含实验数据的仅含尾翼的导弹模型。由于所选导弹模型的实验数据是在超声速下得到的,因此在超声速下进行了气动分析以验证解的正确性。在将机翼安装到选定的导弹上后,使用三种不同的机翼结构进行气动分析,即锥形前缘机翼、锥形后缘机翼和双锥形机翼。通过计算升阻比(CL/CD)对不同翼型进行比较,得出锥形前缘翼型比其他翼型性能更好的结论。锥形前缘、锥形后缘和双锥形的CL/CD值在0.7马赫数下分别为2.327、2.306、2.303和2.45、2.429、2.423。对比结果表明,锥形前缘、锥形后缘和双锥形导弹在0.9马赫数时的CL/CD值分别比0.7马赫数时的CL/CD值高% 5.28、%5.33和%5.21。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Thermal Enginering is aimed at giving a recognized platform to students, researchers, research scholars, teachers, authors and other professionals in the field of research in Thermal Engineering subjects, to publish their original and current research work to a wide, international audience. In order to achieve this goal, we will have applied for SCI-Expanded Index in 2021 after having an Impact Factor in 2020. The aim of the journal, published on behalf of Yildiz Technical University in Istanbul-Turkey, is to not only include actual, original and applied studies prepared on the sciences of heat transfer and thermodynamics, and contribute to the literature of engineering sciences on the national and international areas but also help the development of Mechanical Engineering. Engineers and academicians from disciplines of Power Plant Engineering, Energy Engineering, Building Services Engineering, HVAC Engineering, Solar Engineering, Wind Engineering, Nanoengineering, surface engineering, thin film technologies, and Computer Aided Engineering will be expected to benefit from this journal’s outputs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信