BIRTH INJURY, DUCHENNE-ERBʼS OBSTETRIC PALSY. DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT (LITERATURE REVIEW)

Sergij Khmyzov, Anastasiia Hrytsenko, Genadii Kykosh, Anton Hrytsenko
{"title":"BIRTH INJURY, DUCHENNE-ERBʼS OBSTETRIC PALSY. DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT (LITERATURE REVIEW)","authors":"Sergij Khmyzov, Anastasiia Hrytsenko, Genadii Kykosh, Anton Hrytsenko","doi":"10.15674/0030-59872023369-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obstetric practice dates back thousands of years, providing assistance to women in labor is often complicated by the rapid course of labor, pelvic presentation of the fetus, shoulder dystocia with a possible clavicle fracture. Damage to CV–CVI roots, classic Duchenne–Erb palsy, accounts for 46 % of the total number of obstetric palsies. Objective. To analyze the scientific and medical literature in order to identify historical scientific and practical information about the study of childbirth injuries, and, in particular, Duchenne–Erb's obstetric palsy. Methods. To study and analyze sources of scientific and medical information, publications from Google search engines, electronic databases PubMed, Google Scholar, archival medical journals. Results. The first data on obstetric paralysis were provided by Duchesne in 1872, highlighting thorough reports on upper extremity muscle damage. Subsequently, in 1874, Erb performed electrical stimulation of the affected muscles, finding out the zone of neurological damage. The history of the development and formation of this scientific issue is quite ambiguous, because it borders on two medical fields: neurosurgery and orthopedics. According to literary sources, it is obvious that the pathohistology and pathophysiology of the direct injury zone (roots CV–CVI), delayed changes in the function of the upper limb, and the latest diagnostic technologies simplify the understanding of the presentation. The existing methods of operative interventions allow physicians to improve the child's life. However, the question remains open regarding the use of certain operative interventions in relation to the child's age and further rehabilitation. Conclusions. Despite a significant stratum of scientific and practical research on Duchenne–Erb's obstetric palsy, there are still a number of questions regarding the diagnosis and treatment of children with this abnormality. The search for improving the functional state of the upper limb in children should continue.","PeriodicalId":76291,"journal":{"name":"Ortopediia travmatologiia i protezirovanie","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ortopediia travmatologiia i protezirovanie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872023369-78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obstetric practice dates back thousands of years, providing assistance to women in labor is often complicated by the rapid course of labor, pelvic presentation of the fetus, shoulder dystocia with a possible clavicle fracture. Damage to CV–CVI roots, classic Duchenne–Erb palsy, accounts for 46 % of the total number of obstetric palsies. Objective. To analyze the scientific and medical literature in order to identify historical scientific and practical information about the study of childbirth injuries, and, in particular, Duchenne–Erb's obstetric palsy. Methods. To study and analyze sources of scientific and medical information, publications from Google search engines, electronic databases PubMed, Google Scholar, archival medical journals. Results. The first data on obstetric paralysis were provided by Duchesne in 1872, highlighting thorough reports on upper extremity muscle damage. Subsequently, in 1874, Erb performed electrical stimulation of the affected muscles, finding out the zone of neurological damage. The history of the development and formation of this scientific issue is quite ambiguous, because it borders on two medical fields: neurosurgery and orthopedics. According to literary sources, it is obvious that the pathohistology and pathophysiology of the direct injury zone (roots CV–CVI), delayed changes in the function of the upper limb, and the latest diagnostic technologies simplify the understanding of the presentation. The existing methods of operative interventions allow physicians to improve the child's life. However, the question remains open regarding the use of certain operative interventions in relation to the child's age and further rehabilitation. Conclusions. Despite a significant stratum of scientific and practical research on Duchenne–Erb's obstetric palsy, there are still a number of questions regarding the diagnosis and treatment of children with this abnormality. The search for improving the functional state of the upper limb in children should continue.
出生损伤,杜氏产科麻痹。诊断与治疗(文献复习)
产科实践可以追溯到几千年前,为分娩中的妇女提供帮助往往是复杂的,因为分娩过程迅速,胎儿骨盆呈现,肩关节难产并可能发生锁骨骨折。CV-CVI根损伤,即典型的杜氏麻痹,占产科麻痹总数的46%。目标。分析科学和医学文献,以确定有关分娩损伤研究的历史科学和实用信息,特别是杜氏产科麻痹。方法。研究和分析来自b谷歌搜索引擎、PubMed电子数据库、谷歌Scholar、档案医学期刊的科学和医学信息来源。结果。1872年,Duchesne提供了关于产科瘫痪的第一个数据,强调了上肢肌肉损伤的全面报告。随后,在1874年,Erb对受影响的肌肉进行了电刺激,发现了神经损伤的区域。这一科学问题的发展和形成的历史相当模糊,因为它涉及两个医学领域:神经外科和骨科。根据文献资料,很明显,直接损伤区(根CV-CVI)的病理组织学和病理生理学,上肢功能的延迟变化,以及最新的诊断技术简化了对表现的理解。现有的手术干预方法使医生能够改善儿童的生活。然而,关于使用与儿童年龄和进一步康复有关的某些手术干预措施的问题仍然存在。结论。尽管对Duchenne-Erb产科麻痹的科学和实践研究已经有了显著的进展,但关于这种异常儿童的诊断和治疗仍然存在许多问题。改善儿童上肢功能状态的研究应继续进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信