No longer hype, not yet mainstream? Recalibrating city digital twins' expectations and reality: a case study perspective

IF 2.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Stefano Calzati
{"title":"No longer hype, not yet mainstream? Recalibrating city digital twins' expectations and reality: a case study perspective","authors":"Stefano Calzati","doi":"10.3389/fdata.2023.1236397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the concept of digital twin has already consolidated in industry, its spinoff in the urban environment—in the form of a City Digital Twin (CDT)—is more recent. A CDT is a dynamic digital model of the physical city whereby the physical and the digital are integrated in both directions, thus mutually affecting each other in real time. Replicating the path of smart cities, literature remarks that agendas and discourses around CDTs remain (1) tech-centered, that is, focused on overcoming technical limitations and lacking a proper sociotechnical contextualization of digital twin technologies; (2) practice-first, entailing hands-on applications without a long-term strategic governance for the management of these same technologies. Building on that, the goal of this article is to move beyond high-level conceptualizations of CDT to (a) get a cognizant understanding of what a CDT can do, how, and for whom; (b) map the current state of development and implementation of CDTs in Europe. This will be done by looking at three case studies—Dublin, Helsinki, and Rotterdam—often considered as successful examples of CDTs in Europe. Through exiting literature and official documents, as well as by relying on primary interviews with tech experts and local officials, the article explores the maturity of these CDTs, along the Gartner's hype-mainstream curve of technological innovations. Findings show that, while all three municipalities have long-term plans to deliver an integrated, cyber-physical real-time modeling of the city, currently their CDTs are still at an early stage of development. The focus remains on technical barriers—e.g., integration of different data sources—overlooking the societal dimension, such as the systematic involvement of citizens. As for the governance, all cases embrace a multistakeholder approach; yet CDTs are still not used for policymaking and it remains to see how the power across stakeholders will be distributed in terms of access to, control of, and decisions about CDTs.","PeriodicalId":52859,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Big Data","volume":"10 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Big Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2023.1236397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the concept of digital twin has already consolidated in industry, its spinoff in the urban environment—in the form of a City Digital Twin (CDT)—is more recent. A CDT is a dynamic digital model of the physical city whereby the physical and the digital are integrated in both directions, thus mutually affecting each other in real time. Replicating the path of smart cities, literature remarks that agendas and discourses around CDTs remain (1) tech-centered, that is, focused on overcoming technical limitations and lacking a proper sociotechnical contextualization of digital twin technologies; (2) practice-first, entailing hands-on applications without a long-term strategic governance for the management of these same technologies. Building on that, the goal of this article is to move beyond high-level conceptualizations of CDT to (a) get a cognizant understanding of what a CDT can do, how, and for whom; (b) map the current state of development and implementation of CDTs in Europe. This will be done by looking at three case studies—Dublin, Helsinki, and Rotterdam—often considered as successful examples of CDTs in Europe. Through exiting literature and official documents, as well as by relying on primary interviews with tech experts and local officials, the article explores the maturity of these CDTs, along the Gartner's hype-mainstream curve of technological innovations. Findings show that, while all three municipalities have long-term plans to deliver an integrated, cyber-physical real-time modeling of the city, currently their CDTs are still at an early stage of development. The focus remains on technical barriers—e.g., integration of different data sources—overlooking the societal dimension, such as the systematic involvement of citizens. As for the governance, all cases embrace a multistakeholder approach; yet CDTs are still not used for policymaking and it remains to see how the power across stakeholders will be distributed in terms of access to, control of, and decisions about CDTs.
不再炒作,还不是主流?重新校准城市数字孪生的期望和现实:一个案例研究的视角
虽然数字孪生的概念已经在工业中得到了巩固,但它在城市环境中的衍生——城市数字孪生(CDT)的形式——是最近才出现的。CDT是物理城市的动态数字模型,物理和数字在两个方向上融合,从而实时相互影响。复制智慧城市的路径,文献评论围绕cdt的议程和话语仍然(1)以技术为中心,即专注于克服技术限制,缺乏适当的数字孪生技术的社会技术背景;(2)实践优先,需要实际操作的应用程序,而没有长期的战略治理来管理这些相同的技术。在此基础上,本文的目标是超越CDT的高级概念化,以(a)对CDT可以做什么、如何做以及为谁做有一个认识上的理解;(b)绘制欧洲发展和执行清洁发展技术的现状图。这将通过考察都柏林、赫尔辛基和鹿特丹这三个通常被认为是欧洲cdt成功范例的案例来完成。通过现有文献和官方文件,以及依靠对技术专家和地方官员的初步采访,本文沿着Gartner的技术创新炒作-主流曲线探索了这些cdt的成熟度。调查结果显示,虽然这三个城市都有提供城市综合网络物理实时建模的长期计划,但目前它们的cdt仍处于早期发展阶段。重点仍然是技术障碍,例如。不同数据源的整合——忽略了社会维度,例如公民的系统参与。至于治理,所有案例都采用多利益相关者方法;然而,cdt仍未被用于政策制定,在cdt的获取、控制和决策方面,利益相关者之间的权力如何分配仍有待观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信