Case history factors and audiological screening outcomes in HEU and HIV unexposed neonates at a district level hospital in Gauteng, South Africa

Katijah Khoza-Shangase, Julia Nesbitt
{"title":"Case history factors and audiological screening outcomes in HEU and HIV unexposed neonates at a district level hospital in Gauteng, South Africa","authors":"Katijah Khoza-Shangase, Julia Nesbitt","doi":"10.1007/s44250-023-00049-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While progress has been made in reducing vertical Mother to Child Transmission (MTCT) of HIV, limited research exists on the health needs of HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) neonates, particularly in the field of audiology. This lack of research and evidence could impact early detection and intervention efforts. This study aimed to establish relationships and compare outcomes between case history factors and audiological screening results in HEU and HIV-unexposed neonates at a district-level hospital in Gauteng, South Africa. A non-experimental quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional, comparative research design was employed. Data was collected with a sample size of 212 participants (100 HEU, 112 HIV-unexposed neonates) recruited using quota sampling. The hearing screening process involved case history assessment, medical file review, otoscopy, tympanometry testing, Distortion Product Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE), and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) measurements. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including measures of central tendency and parametric tests, were used for data analysis. The findings indicated that 43% of HEU neonates exhibited refer findings on DPOAE, and 43% on AABR, compared to 26% and 25% respectively in the HIV-unexposed neonatal group. Therefore, a statistically significant relationship was established when comparing audiological results between the HEU and HIV-unexposed groups. Case history factors such as mode of delivery, birth weight, and Apgar scores were not associated with hearing loss in either group. However, in the HEU group, a higher proportion of participants referred on the overall screening in the maternal Retroviral Disease (RVD) stage IV group, although statistical significance was not established. This study fills an evidence gap regarding HEU neonates and highlights the need to include this vulnerable population in policy and clinical guidelines related to early hearing detection, intervention, and preventive audiology initiatives.","PeriodicalId":72826,"journal":{"name":"Discover health systems","volume":"16 1‐2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover health systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44250-023-00049-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract While progress has been made in reducing vertical Mother to Child Transmission (MTCT) of HIV, limited research exists on the health needs of HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) neonates, particularly in the field of audiology. This lack of research and evidence could impact early detection and intervention efforts. This study aimed to establish relationships and compare outcomes between case history factors and audiological screening results in HEU and HIV-unexposed neonates at a district-level hospital in Gauteng, South Africa. A non-experimental quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional, comparative research design was employed. Data was collected with a sample size of 212 participants (100 HEU, 112 HIV-unexposed neonates) recruited using quota sampling. The hearing screening process involved case history assessment, medical file review, otoscopy, tympanometry testing, Distortion Product Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE), and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) measurements. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including measures of central tendency and parametric tests, were used for data analysis. The findings indicated that 43% of HEU neonates exhibited refer findings on DPOAE, and 43% on AABR, compared to 26% and 25% respectively in the HIV-unexposed neonatal group. Therefore, a statistically significant relationship was established when comparing audiological results between the HEU and HIV-unexposed groups. Case history factors such as mode of delivery, birth weight, and Apgar scores were not associated with hearing loss in either group. However, in the HEU group, a higher proportion of participants referred on the overall screening in the maternal Retroviral Disease (RVD) stage IV group, although statistical significance was not established. This study fills an evidence gap regarding HEU neonates and highlights the need to include this vulnerable population in policy and clinical guidelines related to early hearing detection, intervention, and preventive audiology initiatives.
南非豪登省一家区级医院中HEU和HIV未暴露新生儿的病例史因素和听力学筛查结果
虽然在减少艾滋病毒母婴垂直传播(MTCT)方面取得了进展,但关于艾滋病毒暴露未感染(HEU)新生儿健康需求的研究有限,特别是在听力学领域。缺乏研究和证据可能会影响早期发现和干预工作。本研究旨在建立病例史因素与南非豪登省一家区级医院HEU和hiv未暴露新生儿听力学筛查结果之间的关系并比较其结果。采用非实验定量、描述性、横断面比较研究设计。数据收集的样本量为212名参与者(100名HEU, 112名未接触艾滋病毒的新生儿),采用配额抽样方法招募。听力筛查过程包括病史评估、医疗档案回顾、耳镜检查、鼓室测量、畸变产物诱发耳声发射(DPOAE)和自动听觉脑干反应(AABR)测量。数据分析采用描述性和推断性统计,包括集中趋势测量和参数检验。研究结果表明,43%的HEU新生儿在DPOAE和AABR方面表现出参考结果,而未暴露hiv的新生儿组分别为26%和25%。因此,当比较HEU和hiv未暴露组之间的听力学结果时,建立了统计学上显著的关系。两组的病史因素如分娩方式、出生体重和Apgar评分与听力损失无关。然而,在HEU组中,在母体逆转录病毒疾病(RVD) IV期组中接受总体筛查的参与者比例更高,尽管没有统计学意义。这项研究填补了关于新生儿高强度听力障碍的证据空白,并强调了将这一弱势群体纳入与早期听力检测、干预和预防性听力学倡议相关的政策和临床指南的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信