CONTENT ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC CLAIM FOOD ADVERTISEMENT ON YOUTUBE

Hanan Anisa Saniyah, Ujang Sumarwan
{"title":"CONTENT ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC CLAIM FOOD ADVERTISEMENT ON YOUTUBE","authors":"Hanan Anisa Saniyah, Ujang Sumarwan","doi":"10.29244/jcfcs.2.3.236-245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advertisements with organic claims must be able to be proven by how the product is made, the ingredients used, and legal organic certification. Providing correct information is a form of consumer education and protection. This study aims to analyze video advertisements of organic food claims on YouTube social media. The results of the analysis are adjusted in fulfillment of the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK) Number 8 of 1999. This research analyzes the variables of product characteristics, video characteristics, advertising characteristics, and organic claims using the content analysis method and exploratory design. The sample selection was carried out using purposive sampling technique with certain characteristics. The research sample is 200 organic claim advertising videos on YouTube. Data were collected and processed using Microsoft Excel, SPSS 25.0, and Voyant. The results of the analysis show that 62,5 percent of ads use subjective claims and 64,5 percent of ads do not have organic certification. There were 91,5 percent of ads that violated article 17 and 29,0 percent of ads that violated the Ethics of Indonesian Advertising (EPI). Consumers need to improve their knowledge and understanding of organic claim advertisements and be careful in deciding product purchases.","PeriodicalId":500192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Family and Consumer Studies","volume":"160 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Family and Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29244/jcfcs.2.3.236-245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advertisements with organic claims must be able to be proven by how the product is made, the ingredients used, and legal organic certification. Providing correct information is a form of consumer education and protection. This study aims to analyze video advertisements of organic food claims on YouTube social media. The results of the analysis are adjusted in fulfillment of the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK) Number 8 of 1999. This research analyzes the variables of product characteristics, video characteristics, advertising characteristics, and organic claims using the content analysis method and exploratory design. The sample selection was carried out using purposive sampling technique with certain characteristics. The research sample is 200 organic claim advertising videos on YouTube. Data were collected and processed using Microsoft Excel, SPSS 25.0, and Voyant. The results of the analysis show that 62,5 percent of ads use subjective claims and 64,5 percent of ads do not have organic certification. There were 91,5 percent of ads that violated article 17 and 29,0 percent of ads that violated the Ethics of Indonesian Advertising (EPI). Consumers need to improve their knowledge and understanding of organic claim advertisements and be careful in deciding product purchases.
YouTube上有机食品广告内容分析
声称有机产品的广告必须能够证明产品是如何制作的,使用的成分,以及合法的有机认证。提供正确的信息是教育和保护消费者的一种形式。本研究旨在分析YouTube社交媒体上有机食品宣传视频广告。根据1999年《消费者保护法》第8号对分析结果进行了调整。本研究采用内容分析法和探索性设计对产品特征、视频特征、广告特征、有机主张等变量进行分析。采用具有一定特征的有目的抽样技术进行样本选择。研究样本是YouTube上的200个有机广告视频。数据采集和处理采用Microsoft Excel、SPSS 25.0和Voyant软件。分析结果显示,62.5%的广告使用主观声明,64.5%的广告没有有机认证。91.5%的广告违反了第17条,29.0%的广告违反了印度尼西亚广告伦理(EPI)。消费者需要提高他们对有机广告的认识和理解,在决定购买产品时要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信