A Scoping Review on the Clinical Supervision and Mentoring for Nurses in Maternal and Child Health

Bohyun Park, Kyung Ja June, Yeonjae Jo, Jungok Yu
{"title":"A Scoping Review on the Clinical Supervision and Mentoring for Nurses in Maternal and Child Health","authors":"Bohyun Park, Kyung Ja June, Yeonjae Jo, Jungok Yu","doi":"10.21896/jksmch.2023.27.4.215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This scoping review aimed to identify application methods, effectiveness, facilitating factors, and obstacles to clinical supervision for nurses in maternal and child health and to understand its discriminatory characteristics compared to mentoring.Methods: This study was based on the scoping review methodology and consisted of six stages: (1) identifying research questions; (2) identifying relevant studies (search strategy); (3) study selection; (4) charting of the data; (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results; and (6) consultation. From April to July 2022, 1,323 studies were searched in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Open Gray, and finally eleven studies were selected through the literature selection process.Results: Because clinical supervision aimed to strengthen the professional capabilities of nurses, reflective practice was applied. However, mentoring was designed to acquire knowledge or skills that can be applied directly in practice. Therefore, indicators to measure the effects of clinical supervision consisted of psychosocial factors, such as job satisfaction and exhaustion, but the effects of mentoring were evaluated primarily using knowledge levels and skills. The model, which is applied mainly in clinical supervision, reflects the restorative function. When applying clinical supervision and mentoring, listening, supportive environment, and accessibility were identified as facilitating factors, while criticism, lack of time and space, and excessive workload were identified as obstacles.Conclusions: Time and space must be secured to provide effective clinical supervision. The confidentiality of the supervisee must be guaranteed, and sufficient information must be provided in advance so that nurses can accurately recognize the clinical supervision process. Finally, a policy for institutionalizing clinical supervision should be supported to ensure its applicability and sustainability.","PeriodicalId":498469,"journal":{"name":"한국모자보건학회지","volume":"41 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"한국모자보건학회지","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21896/jksmch.2023.27.4.215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This scoping review aimed to identify application methods, effectiveness, facilitating factors, and obstacles to clinical supervision for nurses in maternal and child health and to understand its discriminatory characteristics compared to mentoring.Methods: This study was based on the scoping review methodology and consisted of six stages: (1) identifying research questions; (2) identifying relevant studies (search strategy); (3) study selection; (4) charting of the data; (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results; and (6) consultation. From April to July 2022, 1,323 studies were searched in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Open Gray, and finally eleven studies were selected through the literature selection process.Results: Because clinical supervision aimed to strengthen the professional capabilities of nurses, reflective practice was applied. However, mentoring was designed to acquire knowledge or skills that can be applied directly in practice. Therefore, indicators to measure the effects of clinical supervision consisted of psychosocial factors, such as job satisfaction and exhaustion, but the effects of mentoring were evaluated primarily using knowledge levels and skills. The model, which is applied mainly in clinical supervision, reflects the restorative function. When applying clinical supervision and mentoring, listening, supportive environment, and accessibility were identified as facilitating factors, while criticism, lack of time and space, and excessive workload were identified as obstacles.Conclusions: Time and space must be secured to provide effective clinical supervision. The confidentiality of the supervisee must be guaranteed, and sufficient information must be provided in advance so that nurses can accurately recognize the clinical supervision process. Finally, a policy for institutionalizing clinical supervision should be supported to ensure its applicability and sustainability.
妇幼保健护士临床监督与指导的范围综述
目的:本研究旨在探讨妇幼保健护士临床监督的应用方法、效果、促进因素和障碍,并了解其与指导相比的歧视性特征。方法:本研究基于范围综述方法,包括六个阶段:(1)确定研究问题;(2)识别相关研究(搜索策略);(3)研究选择;(四)数据作图;(五)整理、汇总、报告研究结果;(6)咨询。从2022年4月到7月,在PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane、Open Gray中检索了1323篇研究,通过文献筛选过程最终筛选出11篇研究。结果:临床督导以加强护士专业能力为目的,采用了反思性实习。然而,指导的目的是获取可以直接应用于实践的知识或技能。因此,衡量临床监督效果的指标包括心理社会因素,如工作满意度和疲劳,但指导效果的评估主要使用知识水平和技能。该模型主要应用于临床监督,体现了恢复性功能。在应用临床监督和指导时,倾听、支持性环境和可达性被认为是促进因素,而批评、缺乏时间和空间、工作量过大被认为是障碍。结论:必须保证时间和空间,以提供有效的临床监督。必须保证被监护人的保密,提前提供足够的信息,使护士能够准确识别临床监护过程。最后,应支持临床监督制度化的政策,以确保其适用性和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信