Kempen ‘Semak Ḥadīth Sebelum Sebar’ Antara Tradisi Ahli Ḥadīth Dan Dakyah ‘Wahabi’

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION
Hanaffie Hasin
{"title":"Kempen ‘Semak Ḥadīth Sebelum Sebar’ Antara Tradisi Ahli Ḥadīth Dan Dakyah ‘Wahabi’","authors":"Hanaffie Hasin","doi":"10.33102/johs.v8i2.243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Noble Qur'an and ḥadīth are two main sources of revelation that serve as crucial pillars for the Islamic faith. However, there are several significant differences between these two sources of revelation. The most notable difference lies in terms of thubūt (the authenticity of the transmission of the revelation to its source). Unlike the Noble Qur'an, which has reached the Muslim community through mutawātir (mass-transmitted) chains of narration, the majority of ḥadīth have been transmitted to Muslims through āḥād (singularly transmitted) chains, which are open to criticism regarding their authenticity (ṣādiq) or falsehood (kāzib) in their transmission to the original source, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Scholars from various fields, such as muḥaddithūn (ḥadīth scholars), fuqahā’ (jurists), and uṣūliyyūn (theologians), have laid down various criteria for evaluating the acceptance of a ḥadīth (maqbūl). If a ḥadīth fails to meet any of the established criteria, it is deemed rejected (mardūd). Given the reality that a ḥadīth could be true or false in its attribution to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), many contemporary ḥadīth researchers in Malaysia have launched the campaign 'Check the Ḥadīth Before Spreading.' On the surface, this campaign is commendable and in line with the tradition of ḥadīth scholars who have always emphasized the importance of verifying the status of ḥadīth before accepting or disseminating them. However, there are some who seemingly do not support this campaign and even argue that it is a 'Wahabi' propaganda in Malaysia, attempting to surpass the wisdom of past ḥadīth scholars who never engaged in such a campaign. This reaction has sparked controversy within the discourse of contemporary ḥadīth studies in Malaysia. This paper aims to unravel these issues and shed light on the status of this campaign according to the principles and methodologies of knowledge within the tradition of Islamic ḥadīth studies.","PeriodicalId":40915,"journal":{"name":"Al-Bayan-Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Bayan-Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33102/johs.v8i2.243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Noble Qur'an and ḥadīth are two main sources of revelation that serve as crucial pillars for the Islamic faith. However, there are several significant differences between these two sources of revelation. The most notable difference lies in terms of thubūt (the authenticity of the transmission of the revelation to its source). Unlike the Noble Qur'an, which has reached the Muslim community through mutawātir (mass-transmitted) chains of narration, the majority of ḥadīth have been transmitted to Muslims through āḥād (singularly transmitted) chains, which are open to criticism regarding their authenticity (ṣādiq) or falsehood (kāzib) in their transmission to the original source, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Scholars from various fields, such as muḥaddithūn (ḥadīth scholars), fuqahā’ (jurists), and uṣūliyyūn (theologians), have laid down various criteria for evaluating the acceptance of a ḥadīth (maqbūl). If a ḥadīth fails to meet any of the established criteria, it is deemed rejected (mardūd). Given the reality that a ḥadīth could be true or false in its attribution to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), many contemporary ḥadīth researchers in Malaysia have launched the campaign 'Check the Ḥadīth Before Spreading.' On the surface, this campaign is commendable and in line with the tradition of ḥadīth scholars who have always emphasized the importance of verifying the status of ḥadīth before accepting or disseminating them. However, there are some who seemingly do not support this campaign and even argue that it is a 'Wahabi' propaganda in Malaysia, attempting to surpass the wisdom of past ḥadīth scholars who never engaged in such a campaign. This reaction has sparked controversy within the discourse of contemporary ḥadīth studies in Malaysia. This paper aims to unravel these issues and shed light on the status of this campaign according to the principles and methodologies of knowledge within the tradition of Islamic ḥadīth studies.
Kempen 《Ḥadīth 专家传统与 "Wahabi "Dakyah 之间的 "传播前对 Ḥadīth 的培养
崇高的《古兰经》和ḥadīth是启示的两个主要来源,是伊斯兰信仰的重要支柱。然而,这两种启示来源之间有几个显著的差异。最显著的区别在于thubūt(传播的真实性启示的来源)。不像尊贵的古兰经是通过mutawātir(大规模传播)的叙述链传播到穆斯林社区的,ḥadīth的大部分是通过āḥād(单一传播)链传播给穆斯林的,这是公开的批评,关于它们的真实性(ṣādiq)或虚假(kāzib),它们传播给原始来源,先知穆罕默德(愿主福安之)。muḥaddithūn (ḥadīth学者)、fuqah(法学家)、uṣūliyyūn(神学家)等不同领域的学者制定了评价ḥadīth (maqbūl)的标准。如果ḥadīth未能满足任何既定标准,则视为被拒绝(mardūd)。考虑到ḥadīth对先知穆罕默德(愿主福安之)的描述可能是真的也可能是假的,许多马来西亚的当代ḥadīth研究人员发起了“在传播之前检查Ḥadīth”的运动。从表面上看,这一行动值得赞扬,也符合ḥadīth学者的传统,他们一直强调在接受或传播ḥadīth之前核实其地位的重要性。然而,有些人似乎并不支持这项运动,甚至认为这是马来西亚的“瓦哈比”宣传,试图超越过去从未参与此类运动的ḥadīth学者的智慧。这种反应在马来西亚的当代ḥadīth研究话语中引发了争议。本文旨在揭示这些问题,并根据伊斯兰ḥadīth研究传统中的知识原则和方法,阐明这一运动的现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信