Work environment development using cognitive work analysis’ decision ladders.

Abdulqadir Mohamad Suleiman
{"title":"Work environment development using cognitive work analysis’ decision ladders.","authors":"Abdulqadir Mohamad Suleiman","doi":"10.46364/ejwi.v8i1.1127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to create decision-making content for workplace work environment development, followed by a limited evaluation to determine the perception of the importance of the identified content in different sectors. Enforcement/administrative orders in workplace inspection reports were used as empirical infor-mation on workplaces. This information was used to design decision ladders, which form the second phase of cognitive work analysis, the activity analysis. The decision ladders, which support decision-making, cov-ered work functions identified in an earlier work domain analysis study, i.e., exposure prevention, organisa-tional management, competence realisation, workers’ empowerment, psychosocial work environment man-agement, and administration. Specified content of decision ladders for each function was used to prepare a questionnaire for evaluating the content validity for work environment development.
 Altogether, 29 items were identified as the content for work environment development. Statistical analysis of the limited evaluation showed no significant difference between the different sectors in their perceptions of the importance of the content in developing work environments. Similar sectoral perceptions' trends support the content utility and validity in work environment development.
 The procedure formulation step of the decision ladders, with the phrase “What steps are needed to...” applied preceding the identified content constructs, provides practical activities regarded as essential for work environment development.
 Using enforcement inspection reports as the basis for work environment development is a novel approach to addressing workplace safety and health management challenges. Further, the universal utility of the content allows for its implementation across sectors, allowing for workplace-specific decision-making on management measures.","PeriodicalId":115904,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Workplace Innovation","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Workplace Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46364/ejwi.v8i1.1127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to create decision-making content for workplace work environment development, followed by a limited evaluation to determine the perception of the importance of the identified content in different sectors. Enforcement/administrative orders in workplace inspection reports were used as empirical infor-mation on workplaces. This information was used to design decision ladders, which form the second phase of cognitive work analysis, the activity analysis. The decision ladders, which support decision-making, cov-ered work functions identified in an earlier work domain analysis study, i.e., exposure prevention, organisa-tional management, competence realisation, workers’ empowerment, psychosocial work environment man-agement, and administration. Specified content of decision ladders for each function was used to prepare a questionnaire for evaluating the content validity for work environment development. Altogether, 29 items were identified as the content for work environment development. Statistical analysis of the limited evaluation showed no significant difference between the different sectors in their perceptions of the importance of the content in developing work environments. Similar sectoral perceptions' trends support the content utility and validity in work environment development. The procedure formulation step of the decision ladders, with the phrase “What steps are needed to...” applied preceding the identified content constructs, provides practical activities regarded as essential for work environment development. Using enforcement inspection reports as the basis for work environment development is a novel approach to addressing workplace safety and health management challenges. Further, the universal utility of the content allows for its implementation across sectors, allowing for workplace-specific decision-making on management measures.
运用认知工作分析的决策阶梯开发工作环境。
该研究旨在为工作场所的工作环境发展创造决策内容,然后进行有限的评估,以确定对确定内容在不同部门的重要性的看法。工作场所检查报告中的执法/行政命令被用作关于工作场所的经验资料。这些信息被用来设计决策阶梯,这构成了认知工作分析的第二阶段,即活动分析。支持决策的决策阶梯涵盖了在早期工作领域分析研究中确定的工作功能,即,暴露预防、组织管理、能力实现、工人授权、社会心理工作环境管理和行政管理。利用各职能决策阶梯的规定内容编制工作环境发展内容效度评价问卷。 总共确定了29个项目作为工作环境发展的内容。对有限评价的统计分析显示,不同部门对发展中工作环境中内容重要性的看法没有显著差异。类似的行业感知趋势支持工作环境发展中的内容效用和有效性。 决策阶梯的程序制定步骤,其中有“需要采取哪些步骤来……”“在确定的内容构建之前应用,提供了被认为是工作环境发展必不可少的实践活动。 利用执法检查报告作为工作环境发展的基础,是解决工作场所安全和健康管理挑战的一种新方法。此外,内容的通用实用程序允许跨部门实施,允许对管理措施进行特定工作场所的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信