Parenteral Nutrition-Associated Cholestasis; A Comparison Between Soy-Based Lipids and Mix-Based Lipids in the High-Risk Surgical Neonates

Anas Shikha, Nadarajan Sudhakaran
{"title":"Parenteral Nutrition-Associated Cholestasis; A Comparison Between Soy-Based Lipids and Mix-Based Lipids in the High-Risk Surgical Neonates","authors":"Anas Shikha, Nadarajan Sudhakaran","doi":"10.58624/svoapd.2023.02.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis (PNAC) is a significant concern in high-risk surgical neonates, contributing to morbidity and prolonged hospitalization. This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the impact of different lipid emulsions on the incidence and severity of PNAC in this vulnerable population while controlling for concomitant factors. Material and methods: A cohort of 67 surgical neonates was included, with 35 receiving IntralipidⓇ (IL) and 32 receiving SMOFlipidⓇ (SL). Rigorous inclusion criteria were applied to ensure comparability between the groups, focusing on the type of lipid emulsion as the main difference and selecting patients with prolonged fasting, limited oral intake, and significant PN reliance. The cumulative incidence of PNAC, absolute risk reduction (ARR), odds ratio (OR), and the effect on specific liver function tests, such as conjugated bilirubin (CB) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), were evaluated. Results: The SL group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of PNAC compared to the IL group (22% vs. 57%, p=0.0057), highlighting the potential protective effect of SL against PNAC development in surgical neonates. Subgroup analysis revealed a lower incidence of PNAC in full-term neonates receiving SL compared to IL (16% vs. 52%, p=0.0219), while the difference did not reach statistical significance in premature neonates. Furthermore, SL was associated with a marked reduction in the rise of CB levels compared to IL (34 vs. 66 umol/l, p=0.0093), indicating a potential hepatoprotective effect. Conclusions: This study emphasizes high-risk surgical neonates' susceptibility to PNAC. The incidence of PNAC exceeded reported rates in lower-risk neonates, highlighting their unique challenges. Although SL reduced PNAC risk compared to IL, the absolute rate remained high and of questionable benefit in surgical premature neonates. These findings prompt further investigation into the optimal lipid emulsion for this vulnerable population, weighing the benefits of SL against potential drawbacks.","PeriodicalId":382758,"journal":{"name":"SVOA Paediatrics","volume":"12 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SVOA Paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58624/svoapd.2023.02.051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis (PNAC) is a significant concern in high-risk surgical neonates, contributing to morbidity and prolonged hospitalization. This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the impact of different lipid emulsions on the incidence and severity of PNAC in this vulnerable population while controlling for concomitant factors. Material and methods: A cohort of 67 surgical neonates was included, with 35 receiving IntralipidⓇ (IL) and 32 receiving SMOFlipidⓇ (SL). Rigorous inclusion criteria were applied to ensure comparability between the groups, focusing on the type of lipid emulsion as the main difference and selecting patients with prolonged fasting, limited oral intake, and significant PN reliance. The cumulative incidence of PNAC, absolute risk reduction (ARR), odds ratio (OR), and the effect on specific liver function tests, such as conjugated bilirubin (CB) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), were evaluated. Results: The SL group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of PNAC compared to the IL group (22% vs. 57%, p=0.0057), highlighting the potential protective effect of SL against PNAC development in surgical neonates. Subgroup analysis revealed a lower incidence of PNAC in full-term neonates receiving SL compared to IL (16% vs. 52%, p=0.0219), while the difference did not reach statistical significance in premature neonates. Furthermore, SL was associated with a marked reduction in the rise of CB levels compared to IL (34 vs. 66 umol/l, p=0.0093), indicating a potential hepatoprotective effect. Conclusions: This study emphasizes high-risk surgical neonates' susceptibility to PNAC. The incidence of PNAC exceeded reported rates in lower-risk neonates, highlighting their unique challenges. Although SL reduced PNAC risk compared to IL, the absolute rate remained high and of questionable benefit in surgical premature neonates. These findings prompt further investigation into the optimal lipid emulsion for this vulnerable population, weighing the benefits of SL against potential drawbacks.
肠外营养相关性胆汁淤积症;高危外科新生儿中大豆基脂质与混合基脂质比较
背景:肠外营养相关性胆汁淤积(PNAC)是高危外科新生儿的重要问题,导致发病率和住院时间延长。本回顾性观察研究旨在探讨不同脂质乳剂对易感人群PNAC发病率和严重程度的影响,同时控制伴随因素。材料和方法:纳入67例外科新生儿队列,其中35例接受脂质内注射Ⓡ(IL), 32例接受smof脂质Ⓡ(SL)。采用严格的纳入标准以确保组间的可比性,重点关注脂质乳的类型作为主要差异,并选择禁食时间长、口服摄入有限和明显PN依赖的患者。评估PNAC的累积发病率、绝对风险降低率(ARR)、优势比(OR)以及对特异性肝功能测试的影响,如结合胆红素(CB)和γ -谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)。结果:与IL组相比,SL组PNAC的发生率显著降低(22% vs. 57%, p=0.0057),突出了SL对手术新生儿PNAC发展的潜在保护作用。亚组分析显示,与IL相比,接受SL治疗的足月新生儿PNAC发生率较低(16% vs. 52%, p=0.0219),而早产儿PNAC发生率差异无统计学意义。此外,与IL相比,SL与CB水平升高的显著降低相关(34对66 μ mol/l, p=0.0093),表明具有潜在的肝脏保护作用。结论:本研究强调高危外科新生儿对PNAC的易感性。PNAC在低危新生儿中的发病率超过了报道的发病率,突出了他们独特的挑战。虽然与IL相比,SL降低了PNAC的风险,但绝对比率仍然很高,手术早产儿的益处值得怀疑。这些发现促使人们进一步研究适合这些脆弱人群的最佳脂质乳剂,权衡SL的好处和潜在的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信