Harnessing mobility data to capture changing work from home behaviours between censuses

IF 3.6 3区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Hamish Gibbs, Patrick Ballantyne, James Cheshire, Alex Singleton, Mark A. Green
{"title":"Harnessing mobility data to capture changing work from home behaviours between censuses","authors":"Hamish Gibbs,&nbsp;Patrick Ballantyne,&nbsp;James Cheshire,&nbsp;Alex Singleton,&nbsp;Mark A. Green","doi":"10.1111/geoj.12555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper provides an analysis of working from home patterns in England using data from the 2021 Census to understand (1) how patterns of working from home (WFH) in England have shifted since the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) whether human mobility indicators, specifically Google Community Mobility Reports, provide a reliable proxy for WFH patterns recorded by the 2021 Census, providing a formal evaluation of the reliability of such datasets, whose applications have grown exponentially over the COVID-19 pandemic. We find that WFH patterns recorded by the 2021 Census were unique compared with previous UK censuses, reflecting an unprecedented increase likely caused by persistent changes to employment during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a clear social gradient emerging across the country. We also find that Google mobility in ‘Residential’ and ‘Workplace’ settings provides a reliable measurement of the distribution of WFH populations across Local Authorities, with varying uncertainties for mobility indicators collected in different settings. These findings provide insights into the utility of such datasets to support population research in intercensal periods, where shifts may be occurring, but can be difficult to quantify empirically.</p>","PeriodicalId":48023,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Journal","volume":"190 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geoj.12555","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geoj.12555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of working from home patterns in England using data from the 2021 Census to understand (1) how patterns of working from home (WFH) in England have shifted since the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) whether human mobility indicators, specifically Google Community Mobility Reports, provide a reliable proxy for WFH patterns recorded by the 2021 Census, providing a formal evaluation of the reliability of such datasets, whose applications have grown exponentially over the COVID-19 pandemic. We find that WFH patterns recorded by the 2021 Census were unique compared with previous UK censuses, reflecting an unprecedented increase likely caused by persistent changes to employment during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a clear social gradient emerging across the country. We also find that Google mobility in ‘Residential’ and ‘Workplace’ settings provides a reliable measurement of the distribution of WFH populations across Local Authorities, with varying uncertainties for mobility indicators collected in different settings. These findings provide insights into the utility of such datasets to support population research in intercensal periods, where shifts may be occurring, but can be difficult to quantify empirically.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用流动性数据捕捉两次普查之间不断变化的在家工作行为
本文利用 2021 年人口普查的数据对英格兰的在家工作模式进行了分析,以了解:(1)自 COVID-19 大流行以来,英格兰的在家工作(WFH)模式发生了怎样的变化;(2)人类流动性指标(特别是谷歌社区流动性报告)是否为 2021 年人口普查所记录的在家工作模式提供了可靠的替代指标,从而对此类数据集的可靠性进行了正式评估,此类数据集的应用在 COVID-19 大流行期间呈指数级增长。我们发现,与英国以往的人口普查相比,2021 年人口普查所记录的 WFH 模式是独一无二的,反映出 COVID-19 大流行期间就业的持续变化可能导致了前所未有的增长,全国各地出现了明显的社会梯度。我们还发现,谷歌在 "住宅 "和 "工作场所 "环境中的流动性可以可靠地衡量白领家庭人口在地方政府中的分布情况,而在不同环境中收集的流动性指标的不确定性各不相同。这些发现使我们深入了解了此类数据集在支持人口研究方面的实用性,因为在两次人口普查之间的时期,人口迁移可能正在发生,但很难通过经验进行量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Geographical Journal has been the academic journal of the Royal Geographical Society, under the terms of the Royal Charter, since 1893. It publishes papers from across the entire subject of geography, with particular reference to public debates, policy-orientated agendas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信