Quality of life as a criterion for the effectiveness of surgical treatment of genital prolapses combined with uterine leiomyoma

O.P. Baryshnikova, K.V. Chaika, N.V. Tytarenko, A.V. Vozniuk, V.O. Rud
{"title":"Quality of life as a criterion for the effectiveness of surgical treatment of genital prolapses combined with uterine leiomyoma","authors":"O.P. Baryshnikova, K.V. Chaika, N.V. Tytarenko, A.V. Vozniuk, V.O. Rud","doi":"10.15574/pp.2023.95.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Criteria for choosing the volume of surgical intervention in patients with genital prolapse combined with uterine leiomyoma have not been developed. Purpose - to evaluate quality of life after hysterectomy with and without correction of genital prolapse. Materials and methods. 120 patients were examined. In the Control (I) Group (n=40), hysterectomy was performed without correction of genital prolapse, in the other two groups - hysterectomy and correction of genital prolapse using a mesh implant by the method of pectopexy (the Group II, n=40) or lateral fixation (the Group III, n=40). The PFDI-20, PISQ and PD-QOL questionnaires were used to assess the quality of life after the operation. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Version 21.0. Results. Significant differences in the average number of points were registered in the Group II and Group III - 45.39±27.02 and 49.78±17.24 points respectively; p<0.001. The sexual function index also significantly increased: from 18.93±14.61 to 24.85±12.19 points in the Group II and from 17.55±10.64 to 24.30±13.92 points in the Group III (р=0.01). During the analysis 12 months post surgery, attention was drawn to reliable differences in the average estimates of the impact of manifestations of genital prolapse on the quality of life (the PD-QOL questionnaire), physical and social limitations, interpersonal relationships and emotional problems in the Group II/Group III compared to patients in the Group I (p<0.05). Conclusions. The data we obtained allow us to talk about the effectiveness of simultaneous correction of genital prolapse with hysterectomy using mesh implants. The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of participating institution. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies. No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.","PeriodicalId":481772,"journal":{"name":"Ukraïnsʹkij žurnal Perinatologìâ ì pedìatrìâ","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukraïnsʹkij žurnal Perinatologìâ ì pedìatrìâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15574/pp.2023.95.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Criteria for choosing the volume of surgical intervention in patients with genital prolapse combined with uterine leiomyoma have not been developed. Purpose - to evaluate quality of life after hysterectomy with and without correction of genital prolapse. Materials and methods. 120 patients were examined. In the Control (I) Group (n=40), hysterectomy was performed without correction of genital prolapse, in the other two groups - hysterectomy and correction of genital prolapse using a mesh implant by the method of pectopexy (the Group II, n=40) or lateral fixation (the Group III, n=40). The PFDI-20, PISQ and PD-QOL questionnaires were used to assess the quality of life after the operation. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Version 21.0. Results. Significant differences in the average number of points were registered in the Group II and Group III - 45.39±27.02 and 49.78±17.24 points respectively; p<0.001. The sexual function index also significantly increased: from 18.93±14.61 to 24.85±12.19 points in the Group II and from 17.55±10.64 to 24.30±13.92 points in the Group III (р=0.01). During the analysis 12 months post surgery, attention was drawn to reliable differences in the average estimates of the impact of manifestations of genital prolapse on the quality of life (the PD-QOL questionnaire), physical and social limitations, interpersonal relationships and emotional problems in the Group II/Group III compared to patients in the Group I (p<0.05). Conclusions. The data we obtained allow us to talk about the effectiveness of simultaneous correction of genital prolapse with hysterectomy using mesh implants. The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of participating institution. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies. No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
生活质量作为生殖脱垂合并子宫平滑肌瘤手术治疗效果的标准
对于生殖道脱垂合并子宫平滑肌瘤患者手术干预量的选择标准尚无定论。目的:评价伴有和不伴有生殖器脱垂矫正的子宫切除术后的生活质量。材料和方法。对120例患者进行了检查。对照组(n=40)行子宫切除术,不矫治生殖器脱垂;另两组(II组,n=40)采用胸固定术(n=40)或外侧固定(III组,n=40)的方法行子宫切除术和用网状物植入矫正生殖器脱垂。采用PFDI-20、PISQ、PD-QOL问卷评估患者术后生活质量。采用SPSS Version 21.0进行统计分析。结果。两组平均积分差异有统计学意义,分别为45.39±27.02分和49.78±17.24分;术;0.001。性功能指数也显著提高:II组由18.93±14.61分提高到24.85±12.19分,III组由17.55±10.64分提高到24.30±13.92分(p < 0.01)。在术后12个月的分析中,值得注意的是,与I组患者相比,II/ III组患者生殖器脱下垂表现对生活质量(PD-QOL问卷)、身体和社会限制、人际关系和情绪问题影响的平均估计存在可靠差异(p<0.05)。结论。我们获得的数据使我们能够讨论使用网状植入物同时矫正生殖器脱垂和子宫切除术的有效性。这项研究是按照《赫尔辛基宣言》的原则进行的。本研究方案经参与单位当地伦理委员会批准。获得患者的知情同意进行研究。作者未声明存在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信