Partnership attributes and partnership success in accounting firms: a conceptual perspective and further directions

Kwabena Antwi-Situ, Samuel Koomson
{"title":"Partnership attributes and partnership success in accounting firms: a conceptual perspective and further directions","authors":"Kwabena Antwi-Situ, Samuel Koomson","doi":"10.1108/manm-04-2023-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose More complexity, less freedom, distrust and a lack of information seem to pose threats to the success of partner relationships in accounting firms, as approximately 70% of business partnerships fail globally, undermining SDG 17. The low competitive intensity in this industry seems not to help the current situation. Yet, the existing strategic alliance (SA) literature have been somewhat sluggish in adequately addressing how partnership attributes (PAs) affect partnership success (PS) and how brand competition (BC) impacts this relationship. In response, this conceptual work addresses the impact of PAs on PS in accounting firms. It further explores the BC conditions under which the PAs–PS connection may be intensified. Design/methodology/approach Incorporating theories and empirics on six distinct topics, this study presents a conceptual model and ten hypotheses that are worth testing in future research. Findings This research finds that PAs will be favourably linked to PS, and this favourable association will be positively moderated by BC such that the PAs–PS connection will be more pronounced if BC within the accounting industry is high than low. Research limitations/implications Further research is needed to empirically test the suppositions made. Also, they could extend the proposed framework to cover other moderators like technological turbulence, market dynamism and government regulation. Practical implications Practical lessons for governments, shareholders, chief executive officers, consultants and other industry players, particularly those who are interested in the success of accounting partnership firms, are deliberated. Originality/value This study demonstrates how PAs and BC interact to foster PS. It also provides a baseline information for upcoming researchers to investigate other external factors under which the PAs–PS connection may be improved.","PeriodicalId":219219,"journal":{"name":"Management Matters","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/manm-04-2023-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose More complexity, less freedom, distrust and a lack of information seem to pose threats to the success of partner relationships in accounting firms, as approximately 70% of business partnerships fail globally, undermining SDG 17. The low competitive intensity in this industry seems not to help the current situation. Yet, the existing strategic alliance (SA) literature have been somewhat sluggish in adequately addressing how partnership attributes (PAs) affect partnership success (PS) and how brand competition (BC) impacts this relationship. In response, this conceptual work addresses the impact of PAs on PS in accounting firms. It further explores the BC conditions under which the PAs–PS connection may be intensified. Design/methodology/approach Incorporating theories and empirics on six distinct topics, this study presents a conceptual model and ten hypotheses that are worth testing in future research. Findings This research finds that PAs will be favourably linked to PS, and this favourable association will be positively moderated by BC such that the PAs–PS connection will be more pronounced if BC within the accounting industry is high than low. Research limitations/implications Further research is needed to empirically test the suppositions made. Also, they could extend the proposed framework to cover other moderators like technological turbulence, market dynamism and government regulation. Practical implications Practical lessons for governments, shareholders, chief executive officers, consultants and other industry players, particularly those who are interested in the success of accounting partnership firms, are deliberated. Originality/value This study demonstrates how PAs and BC interact to foster PS. It also provides a baseline information for upcoming researchers to investigate other external factors under which the PAs–PS connection may be improved.
会计师事务所合伙人属性与合伙人成功:概念视角及进一步研究方向
更复杂、更少自由、不信任和缺乏信息似乎对会计师事务所合作伙伴关系的成功构成了威胁,因为全球约有70%的商业伙伴关系失败,从而破坏了可持续发展目标17。这个行业的低竞争强度似乎无助于现状。然而,现有的战略联盟(SA)文献在充分探讨伙伴关系属性(PAs)如何影响伙伴关系成功(PS)以及品牌竞争(BC)如何影响这种关系方面有些迟缓。作为回应,这一概念性工作解决了cpa对会计师事务所PS的影响。进一步探讨了PAs-PS连接可能增强的BC条件。结合六个不同主题的理论和经验,本研究提出了一个概念模型和十个假设,值得在未来的研究中进行检验。本研究发现,PAs将与PS有利地联系在一起,这种有利的联系将被BC积极调节,因此,如果会计行业内的BC高而不是低,PAs - PS的联系将更加明显。研究局限/启示需要进一步的研究来实证检验所做的假设。此外,他们还可以扩展拟议的框架,以涵盖技术动荡、市场活力和政府监管等其他调节因素。对政府、股东、首席执行官、顾问和其他行业参与者,特别是那些对会计合伙公司的成功感兴趣的人来说,实际教训是经过深思熟虑的。原创性/价值本研究展示了PAs和BC如何相互作用以促进PS。它也为未来的研究人员研究PAs - PS连接可能改善的其他外部因素提供了基线信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信