A primary evaluation of Syrian forest damage since 2011: a case study of Alhamam and Alboz forest sites

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
M Aldakhil, S Abdullateef, F Mahmoud, A Alhasan, A Lakmes, M Al Abdullah, GR Watmough
{"title":"A primary evaluation of Syrian forest damage since 2011: a case study of Alhamam and Alboz forest sites","authors":"M Aldakhil, S Abdullateef, F Mahmoud, A Alhasan, A Lakmes, M Al Abdullah, GR Watmough","doi":"10.3832/ifor4032-016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forests and trees make vital contributions to well-being, economic activities, ecosystem functioning and global system dynamics. There has been a lack of studies on the evaluation of the drivers of Syrian forest damage during the current conflict. This study estimated the damage since 2011 in the Alhamam and Alboz forest sites in Idlib province of Syria and evaluated the drivers of this damage. A multidimensional approach to damage assessment was developed which combined forest plot inventories, remotely sensed satellite image analysis, questionnaires and focus groups to enable a comparison of the forest from 2011 and 2017. The plot inventory data and remote sensing analysis provided estimates of forest damage and loss whilst focus groups and questionnaires provided vital information on the drivers of forest loss which is required for developing reforestation programmes. Overall, forest inventory data and satellite image analysis results indicated a reduction in tree cover, density and plant diversity. The results indicate a much higher loss of forest than is available from global products such as Global Forest Watch due to the prevalence in Syria of low-density Oak forests such as Alhamam not being classed as forest. The results of questionnaires and focus groups showed that the main cause of damage was an increased demand for fire-wood driven by a lack of fuel oil and increased unemployment, reduced household incomes and general price rises, making fuel more unaffordable. Respondents to surveys generally understood the importance of trees and forests and overtime the local knowledge of the importance of forest resources had not changed. This multidimensional approach indicates a reduced capacity of institutions to protect forests and will help to establish strategic plans to serve and protect the forest in the future.","PeriodicalId":13323,"journal":{"name":"Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4032-016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forests and trees make vital contributions to well-being, economic activities, ecosystem functioning and global system dynamics. There has been a lack of studies on the evaluation of the drivers of Syrian forest damage during the current conflict. This study estimated the damage since 2011 in the Alhamam and Alboz forest sites in Idlib province of Syria and evaluated the drivers of this damage. A multidimensional approach to damage assessment was developed which combined forest plot inventories, remotely sensed satellite image analysis, questionnaires and focus groups to enable a comparison of the forest from 2011 and 2017. The plot inventory data and remote sensing analysis provided estimates of forest damage and loss whilst focus groups and questionnaires provided vital information on the drivers of forest loss which is required for developing reforestation programmes. Overall, forest inventory data and satellite image analysis results indicated a reduction in tree cover, density and plant diversity. The results indicate a much higher loss of forest than is available from global products such as Global Forest Watch due to the prevalence in Syria of low-density Oak forests such as Alhamam not being classed as forest. The results of questionnaires and focus groups showed that the main cause of damage was an increased demand for fire-wood driven by a lack of fuel oil and increased unemployment, reduced household incomes and general price rises, making fuel more unaffordable. Respondents to surveys generally understood the importance of trees and forests and overtime the local knowledge of the importance of forest resources had not changed. This multidimensional approach indicates a reduced capacity of institutions to protect forests and will help to establish strategic plans to serve and protect the forest in the future.
2011年以来叙利亚森林破坏的初步评估:以Alhamam和Alboz森林遗址为例
森林和树木对人类福祉、经济活动、生态系统功能和全球系统动态作出了重要贡献。在当前冲突期间,缺乏对叙利亚森林破坏驱动因素的评估研究。本研究估计了自2011年以来叙利亚伊德利卜省Alhamam和Alboz森林遗址的破坏情况,并评估了这种破坏的驱动因素。开发了一种多维损害评估方法,将森林样地调查、遥感卫星图像分析、问卷调查和焦点小组相结合,对2011年和2017年的森林进行了比较。小区清查数据和遥感分析提供了对森林破坏和损失的估计,而焦点小组和调查表提供了关于森林损失驱动因素的重要信息,这是制定再造林方案所必需的。总体而言,森林清查数据和卫星图像分析结果显示树木覆盖、密度和植物多样性减少。结果表明,由于叙利亚普遍存在Alhamam等未被归类为森林的低密度橡树林,因此森林损失比全球森林观察等全球产品所提供的要高得多。问卷调查和焦点小组的结果表明,造成损害的主要原因是由于缺乏燃料油和失业增加、家庭收入减少和一般价格上涨导致对木柴的需求增加,使燃料更加难以负担。调查对象普遍了解树木和森林的重要性,而且随着时间的推移,当地对森林资源重要性的认识没有改变。这种多层面的做法表明,各机构保护森林的能力有所下降,并将有助于制定今后服务和保护森林的战略计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal encompasses a broad range of research aspects concerning forest science: forest ecology, biodiversity/genetics and ecophysiology, silviculture, forest inventory and planning, forest protection and monitoring, forest harvesting, landscape ecology, forest history, wood technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信