{"title":"Carcinogenic Effects of Nitrosodimethylamine Contamination in Ranitidine: Defining the Relationship With Renal Malignancies","authors":"Nuphat Yodkhunnatham, Dhruv Puri, Kshitij Pandit, Aditya Bagrodia","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ranitidine, a common medication for gastric ulcers, was withdrawn from the market because of contamination with the likely carcinogen N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA). The Gold and Margulis article1 examines the clinical risks associated with ranitidine, reviewing its history, scientific evidence, and possible link to kidney cancer. The discovery of NDMA contamination has raised concerns about its safety, particularly its potential connection to kidney cancer. The authors examine the relationship between NDMA and kidney cancer, citing an array of animal studies that demonstrate NDMA's potential carcinogenicity. The article also explains how NDMA is formed and its DNA-damaging potential, shedding light on the inherent risks that categorize NDMA as a probable human carcinogen. Furthermore, the article examines available epidemiological data concerning the association between ranitidine use and kidney cancer risk. While acknowledging the inherent limitations of such data, the authors emphasize the need for further prospective clinical research to confirm the link between ranitidine and kidney cancer risk in humans. This editorial comment on the ranitidine controversy underscores the need for strict pharmaceutical quality control and reminds us of the balance between clinical research, regulations, and patient health. The article calls for continued vigilance in assessing the risks and benefits of ranitidine, especially concerning potential kidney cancer risk.","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Ranitidine, a common medication for gastric ulcers, was withdrawn from the market because of contamination with the likely carcinogen N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA). The Gold and Margulis article1 examines the clinical risks associated with ranitidine, reviewing its history, scientific evidence, and possible link to kidney cancer. The discovery of NDMA contamination has raised concerns about its safety, particularly its potential connection to kidney cancer. The authors examine the relationship between NDMA and kidney cancer, citing an array of animal studies that demonstrate NDMA's potential carcinogenicity. The article also explains how NDMA is formed and its DNA-damaging potential, shedding light on the inherent risks that categorize NDMA as a probable human carcinogen. Furthermore, the article examines available epidemiological data concerning the association between ranitidine use and kidney cancer risk. While acknowledging the inherent limitations of such data, the authors emphasize the need for further prospective clinical research to confirm the link between ranitidine and kidney cancer risk in humans. This editorial comment on the ranitidine controversy underscores the need for strict pharmaceutical quality control and reminds us of the balance between clinical research, regulations, and patient health. The article calls for continued vigilance in assessing the risks and benefits of ranitidine, especially concerning potential kidney cancer risk.