La formation des professionnels en psychiatrie légale : résultats d’une enquête en Occitanie

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Julien Da Costa , Mathilde Coulanges , Tristan Renard , Trevor O’Neill Walsh , Julie Malaterre , Lucille Moutet , Maxime Védère , Anne-Hélène Moncany
{"title":"La formation des professionnels en psychiatrie légale : résultats d’une enquête en Occitanie","authors":"Julien Da Costa ,&nbsp;Mathilde Coulanges ,&nbsp;Tristan Renard ,&nbsp;Trevor O’Neill Walsh ,&nbsp;Julie Malaterre ,&nbsp;Lucille Moutet ,&nbsp;Maxime Védère ,&nbsp;Anne-Hélène Moncany","doi":"10.1016/j.amp.2023.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Since the enactment of the French law of 4 March 2002, patients’ rights have been the subject of constant legislative evolution and particular attention from many independent administrative authorities. In psychiatry, these have led to numerous legal reforms over the years. Moreover, psychiatry is a medical specialty with abundant, long-standing and more than ever topical interactions with the judicial system (psychiatric care without consent, isolation and restraint, court-ordered care, psychiatric care in prisons, treatment of perpetrators of sexual violence, judicial expertise or the question of lack of criminal responsibility due to a mental disorder). In response to the many legal questions asked by medical and paramedical teams, and to the growing interest in research in forensic psychiatry, a unit called EPL (Espace de Psychiatrie Légale) was created, composed of a multidisciplinary team, based in the department of Haute-Garonne, France. In order to adjust its scope of intervention, a questionnaire was distributed to mental health professionals to assess their training needs in forensic psychiatry. In this article, we aim to present and discuss the results of this survey.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a self-assessment survey designed by the multidisciplinary team of the EPL and which was filled out online by the respondents. The target population was all the professionals working in mental health facilities, members of the FERREPSY Occitanie research federation. The questionnaire consisted of several sections relating to the respondents, the typology of patients under their care, the professionals’ daily practice, and training in and knowledge of forensic psychiatry. We included some open-ended questions on the situations encountered that may have presented difficulties and on the impact of legislative changes on the daily practice of professionals. All responses were analyzed anonymously.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 05/05/21 to 17/07/21, 155 professionals responded. Most of them were psychiatrists (32.3%), healthcare managers (20.6%) or nurses (18.7%). The majority were women (78.7%) and had been working in Haute-Garonne for more than 5 years (74.2%). 56.1% of the professionals worked in outpatient units, 37.4% in inpatient wards and 74.8% in adult psychiatry. This questionnaire revealed a strong need for training in forensic psychiatry. Indeed, 94.8% of respondents wanted to receive training in forensic psychiatry, which contrasts with the number of people who had already received training in this area (15.5% in initial training, 32.3% in continuing education). The results highlighted that the most common forensic situations encountered in daily clinical practice concerned areas where professionals considered their knowledge to be insufficient. In addition, the self-assessment scales used were able to highlight specific training topics that should be developed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this survey therefore establish a basis for making adjustments to future educational interventions involving forensic psychiatry, which, although it has only recently emerged in France, embraces issues that have always concerned the management of patients receiving psychiatric care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7992,"journal":{"name":"Annales medico-psychologiques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales medico-psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003448723002597","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Since the enactment of the French law of 4 March 2002, patients’ rights have been the subject of constant legislative evolution and particular attention from many independent administrative authorities. In psychiatry, these have led to numerous legal reforms over the years. Moreover, psychiatry is a medical specialty with abundant, long-standing and more than ever topical interactions with the judicial system (psychiatric care without consent, isolation and restraint, court-ordered care, psychiatric care in prisons, treatment of perpetrators of sexual violence, judicial expertise or the question of lack of criminal responsibility due to a mental disorder). In response to the many legal questions asked by medical and paramedical teams, and to the growing interest in research in forensic psychiatry, a unit called EPL (Espace de Psychiatrie Légale) was created, composed of a multidisciplinary team, based in the department of Haute-Garonne, France. In order to adjust its scope of intervention, a questionnaire was distributed to mental health professionals to assess their training needs in forensic psychiatry. In this article, we aim to present and discuss the results of this survey.

Methods

We used a self-assessment survey designed by the multidisciplinary team of the EPL and which was filled out online by the respondents. The target population was all the professionals working in mental health facilities, members of the FERREPSY Occitanie research federation. The questionnaire consisted of several sections relating to the respondents, the typology of patients under their care, the professionals’ daily practice, and training in and knowledge of forensic psychiatry. We included some open-ended questions on the situations encountered that may have presented difficulties and on the impact of legislative changes on the daily practice of professionals. All responses were analyzed anonymously.

Results

From 05/05/21 to 17/07/21, 155 professionals responded. Most of them were psychiatrists (32.3%), healthcare managers (20.6%) or nurses (18.7%). The majority were women (78.7%) and had been working in Haute-Garonne for more than 5 years (74.2%). 56.1% of the professionals worked in outpatient units, 37.4% in inpatient wards and 74.8% in adult psychiatry. This questionnaire revealed a strong need for training in forensic psychiatry. Indeed, 94.8% of respondents wanted to receive training in forensic psychiatry, which contrasts with the number of people who had already received training in this area (15.5% in initial training, 32.3% in continuing education). The results highlighted that the most common forensic situations encountered in daily clinical practice concerned areas where professionals considered their knowledge to be insufficient. In addition, the self-assessment scales used were able to highlight specific training topics that should be developed.

Conclusions

The results of this survey therefore establish a basis for making adjustments to future educational interventions involving forensic psychiatry, which, although it has only recently emerged in France, embraces issues that have always concerned the management of patients receiving psychiatric care.

法医精神病学专业人员培训:奥克西塔尼调查的结果
目标自 2002 年 3 月 4 日法国法律颁布以来,患者权利一直是立法不断演变的主题,并受到许多独立行政机构的特别关注。在精神病学领域,这些年来已经进行了多次法律改革。此外,精神病学是一门医学专科,它与司法系统之间有着大量、长期且比以往任何时候都更加热门的互动关系(未经同意的精神病治疗、隔离和限制、法院命令的治疗、监狱中的精神病治疗、性暴力实施者的治疗、司法鉴定或因精神失常而不承担刑事责任的问题)。针对医疗和辅助医疗团队提出的许多法律问题,以及对法医精神病学研究日益增长的兴趣,成立了一个名为 EPL(Espace de Psychiatrie Légale)的部门,由一个多学科团队组成,总部设在法国上加龙省。为了调整其干预范围,我们向精神卫生专业人员发放了一份调查问卷,以评估他们在法医精神病学方面的培训需求。在本文中,我们旨在介绍并讨论此次调查的结果。方法我们使用了由 EPL 多学科团队设计的自我评估调查表,由受访者在线填写。调查对象是在精神卫生机构工作的所有专业人员,他们都是奥西塔尼研究联合会(FERREPSY Occitanie)的成员。问卷由几个部分组成,分别涉及受访者、受其照料的病人类型、专业人员的日常工作以及法医精神病学方面的培训和知识。我们还就可能遇到困难的情况以及立法变化对专业人员日常工作的影响提出了一些开放式问题。结果从 21 年 5 月 5 日到 21 年 7 月 17 日,共有 155 位专业人士做出了回复。其中大部分是精神科医生(32.3%)、医疗保健经理(20.6%)或护士(18.7%)。大多数为女性(78.7%),在上加龙省工作超过 5 年(74.2%)。56.1%的专业人员在门诊部工作,37.4%在住院部工作,74.8%在成人精神科工作。调查问卷显示,人们对法医精神病学方面的培训有着强烈的需求。事实上,94.8%的受访者希望接受法医精神病学方面的培训,这与已经接受过这方面培训的人数(15.5%接受过初步培训,32.3%接受过继续教育)形成了鲜明对比。结果表明,在日常临床实践中最常遇到的法医情况涉及专业人员认为自己知识不足的领域。此外,所使用的自我评估量表还能突出应开发的特定培训主题。结论因此,本次调查的结果为今后调整涉及法医精神病学的教育干预措施奠定了基础。虽然法医精神病学最近才在法国兴起,但它所涉及的问题一直与接受精神病学治疗的患者的管理有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annales medico-psychologiques
Annales medico-psychologiques 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annales Médico-Psychologiques is a peer-reviewed medical journal covering the field of psychiatry. Articles are published in French or in English. The journal was established in 1843 and is published by Elsevier on behalf of the Société Médico-Psychologique. The journal publishes 10 times a year original articles covering biological, genetic, psychological, forensic and cultural issues relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness, as well as peer reviewed articles that have been presented and discussed during meetings of the Société Médico-Psychologique.To report on the major currents of thought of contemporary psychiatry, and to publish clinical and biological research of international standard, these are the aims of the Annales Médico-Psychologiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信