Queering Sight: Visualising the Transversal Other in Josh Malerman’s Bird Box

Forum Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.2218/forum.1.9153
Kai Tjoon Lim
{"title":"Queering Sight: Visualising the Transversal Other in Josh Malerman’s Bird Box","authors":"Kai Tjoon Lim","doi":"10.2218/forum.1.9153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gaze has hitherto occupied a contentious position within theoretical discourse. While feminist and postcolonial approaches have succeeded in productively interrogating the unequal power dynamics produced by the gaze, purely naming and uncovering how these visual oppressions function do little to conceptualise possibilities of moving beyond sight’s vilification in identity formations. Unlike other physical senses such as touch and smell that have already been theorised as bases of ethical intersubjective relationality, sight has yet to be reclaimed as part of an affirmative politics to disrupt the exclusionary processes that undergird identity politics. This article is, therefore, concerned with queer interventions to rethink sight as a possible mode of transgression from restrictive binarisms within identity formation. It argues that sight instead possesses the potential to liberate bodies and constrained subjectivities from the coercive frameworks of visual objectification. By queering sight, the article positions itself as a rejection of dualistic paradigms by subversively envisioning identities as transversal processes of liberation and becoming. To this end, I will engage with Josh Malerman’s Bird Box (2014) where mediated acts of looking represent queer(ed) sources of danger and liberation. In its peculiar and particular denial of direct visual access, the novel’s aesthetics allow for productive possibilities of visualising the transversal Other.","PeriodicalId":53229,"journal":{"name":"Forum","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2218/forum.1.9153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gaze has hitherto occupied a contentious position within theoretical discourse. While feminist and postcolonial approaches have succeeded in productively interrogating the unequal power dynamics produced by the gaze, purely naming and uncovering how these visual oppressions function do little to conceptualise possibilities of moving beyond sight’s vilification in identity formations. Unlike other physical senses such as touch and smell that have already been theorised as bases of ethical intersubjective relationality, sight has yet to be reclaimed as part of an affirmative politics to disrupt the exclusionary processes that undergird identity politics. This article is, therefore, concerned with queer interventions to rethink sight as a possible mode of transgression from restrictive binarisms within identity formation. It argues that sight instead possesses the potential to liberate bodies and constrained subjectivities from the coercive frameworks of visual objectification. By queering sight, the article positions itself as a rejection of dualistic paradigms by subversively envisioning identities as transversal processes of liberation and becoming. To this end, I will engage with Josh Malerman’s Bird Box (2014) where mediated acts of looking represent queer(ed) sources of danger and liberation. In its peculiar and particular denial of direct visual access, the novel’s aesthetics allow for productive possibilities of visualising the transversal Other.
古怪的视线:在Josh Malerman的《鸟盒》中视觉化横向他者
迄今为止,凝视在理论论述中一直占据着一个有争议的位置。虽然女权主义和后殖民主义的方法已经成功地对凝视产生的不平等权力动态进行了富有成效的质疑,但纯粹的命名和揭示这些视觉压迫是如何发挥作用的,对于概念化超越视觉在身份形成中的诋毁的可能性几乎没有作用。与其他身体感官(如触觉和嗅觉)不同,视觉已经被理论化为伦理主体间关系的基础,而视觉尚未被重新定义为肯定政治的一部分,以破坏作为身份政治基础的排他性过程。因此,本文关注酷儿干预,以重新思考视觉作为身份形成中限制性二元对立的一种可能的越界模式。它认为,视觉反而具有将身体和受约束的主体性从视觉客观化的强制框架中解放出来的潜力。通过古怪的眼光,文章将自己定位为对二元范式的拒绝,颠覆性地将身份设想为解放和成为的横向过程。为此,我将研究乔什·马尔曼(Josh Malerman)的《鸟盒》(Bird Box, 2014),在这部作品中,被中介的观看行为代表了危险和解放的奇怪(ed)来源。在其独特和特别的拒绝直接的视觉访问中,小说的美学允许将横向他者可视化的生产可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信