Manipulation-Proof Virtual Bidding Mechanism Design

Chenbei Lu;Jinhao Liang;Nan Gu;Haoxiang Wang;Chenye Wu
{"title":"Manipulation-Proof Virtual Bidding Mechanism Design","authors":"Chenbei Lu;Jinhao Liang;Nan Gu;Haoxiang Wang;Chenye Wu","doi":"10.1109/TEMPR.2023.3321649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The high penetration of renewable energy increases the price volatility between the day-ahead (DA) and real-time (RT) markets, with heightened power system operational risks. Virtual bidding, a rising financial instrument, allows financial entities without energy-generating capacity or demand to arbitrage between the DA and RT markets, which can in turn reduce the market spread between the two markets and thus contain system operation risks. However, in practice, incomplete information often affects the effectiveness of virtual bidding, which poses uncertainties to strategic bidding behaviors, and makes it more challenging to understand the market manipulation. To control such risks, in this paper, we first game theoretically characterize the Nash Equilibrium of virtual bidding with both complete and incomplete information, and evaluate the benefits of virtual bidding for both virtual bidders (VBs) and the system as a whole. Then, we design a joint tax-subsidy mechanism for VBs with truthfulness and individual rationality guarantees against the market manipulation. We also prove that the system average forecast is the key to influencing the virtual bidding equilibrium. Further, we design two information mechanisms to enable VB privacy protection and market risk control separately. Numerical studies based on ISO-NE electricity market data verify our theory.","PeriodicalId":100639,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation","volume":"2 1","pages":"119-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10269719/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The high penetration of renewable energy increases the price volatility between the day-ahead (DA) and real-time (RT) markets, with heightened power system operational risks. Virtual bidding, a rising financial instrument, allows financial entities without energy-generating capacity or demand to arbitrage between the DA and RT markets, which can in turn reduce the market spread between the two markets and thus contain system operation risks. However, in practice, incomplete information often affects the effectiveness of virtual bidding, which poses uncertainties to strategic bidding behaviors, and makes it more challenging to understand the market manipulation. To control such risks, in this paper, we first game theoretically characterize the Nash Equilibrium of virtual bidding with both complete and incomplete information, and evaluate the benefits of virtual bidding for both virtual bidders (VBs) and the system as a whole. Then, we design a joint tax-subsidy mechanism for VBs with truthfulness and individual rationality guarantees against the market manipulation. We also prove that the system average forecast is the key to influencing the virtual bidding equilibrium. Further, we design two information mechanisms to enable VB privacy protection and market risk control separately. Numerical studies based on ISO-NE electricity market data verify our theory.
防操纵虚拟竞价机制设计
可再生能源的高渗透率增加了日前市场(DA)和实时市场(RT)之间的价格波动,加剧了电力系统的运行风险。虚拟竞价作为一种新兴的金融工具,允许没有发电能力或需求的金融实体在日前市场和实时市场之间进行套利,这反过来又可以减少两个市场之间的市场价差,从而抑制系统运行风险。但在实际操作中,不完全信息往往会影响虚拟竞价的效果,给策略性竞价行为带来不确定性,也使得理解市场操纵行为更具挑战性。为了控制这种风险,本文首先从博弈论上描述了完全信息和不完全信息下虚拟竞价的纳什均衡,并评估了虚拟竞价对虚拟竞价者(VBs)和整个系统的益处。然后,我们为虚拟投标人设计了一种联合税收补贴机制,该机制具有真实性和个体理性保证,可防止市场操纵。我们还证明了系统平均预测是影响虚拟竞价均衡的关键。此外,我们还设计了两种信息机制,以分别实现虚拟投标人隐私保护和市场风险控制。基于 ISO-NE 电力市场数据的数值研究验证了我们的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信