ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS OF THE FAR EASTERN REGIONS: ANALYSIS OF THE INDICATORS

IF 0.2 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Voprosy Gosudarstvennogo i Munitsipalnogo Upravleniya-Public Administration Issues Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-3-95-121

Zoya Mirzekhanova, Anastasia Koltsova

{"title":"ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS OF THE FAR EASTERN REGIONS: ANALYSIS OF THE INDICATORS","authors":"Zoya Mirzekhanova, Anastasia Koltsova","doi":"10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-3-95-121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Addressing regional problems in the field of environmental protection is carried out within the framework of targeted environmental programs, documents reflecting the essence of the ongoing regional environmental policy. Approved indicators monitor the effectiveness of its implementation. In many regions, the results of the implementation of previous programs are disappointing, which is due to many reasons. The following questions remain unanswered: how the national and territorial interests are combined in the development of programs, how the content of the program tasks and the indicators of their effectiveness correspond to the targets of these documents? The hypothesis of the study is that the imperfection of regional environmental programs complicates their effectiveness. The purpose of the study is to analyze the content of the used indicators that are fixed in the environmental programs of the most economically developed regions of the Far Eastfor identification of the highest priority regional environmental tasks and the focus of their solution to improve the system of indicators in subsequent revisions of environmental protection documents. The information base includes regulatory documents in the field of environmental security in Russia, statistics data, rules and regulations on the development, implementation and evaluation of effectiveness state and municipal programs, national and regional programs on \"Environmental protection\" of the Far East subjects, adopted for the period 2020-2025. Having analysed 211 indicators proposed in the regional programs in order to determine the share of the most significant for environmental protection, the correlation of their content with the specifics of regional development has been established. It has been determined that more than 50% of all indicators relate to direct improvement of the environment. During the analysis, the main shortcomings in the selection of the indicators have been identified: 16% of indicators are not correct in content; 41% of indicators do not have clear quantitative benchmarks, which does not always make it possible to assess the achievement of objectives. The solution of the indicated issues will allow expanding the theoretical knowledge in terms of the formation of regional environmental policy and enriching the practice of regional interpretation and solution of accumulated problems, which is demanded due to the limited number of works in this area.","PeriodicalId":43338,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Gosudarstvennogo i Munitsipalnogo Upravleniya-Public Administration Issues","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Gosudarstvennogo i Munitsipalnogo Upravleniya-Public Administration Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-3-95-121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Addressing regional problems in the field of environmental protection is carried out within the framework of targeted environmental programs, documents reflecting the essence of the ongoing regional environmental policy. Approved indicators monitor the effectiveness of its implementation. In many regions, the results of the implementation of previous programs are disappointing, which is due to many reasons. The following questions remain unanswered: how the national and territorial interests are combined in the development of programs, how the content of the program tasks and the indicators of their effectiveness correspond to the targets of these documents? The hypothesis of the study is that the imperfection of regional environmental programs complicates their effectiveness. The purpose of the study is to analyze the content of the used indicators that are fixed in the environmental programs of the most economically developed regions of the Far Eastfor identification of the highest priority regional environmental tasks and the focus of their solution to improve the system of indicators in subsequent revisions of environmental protection documents. The information base includes regulatory documents in the field of environmental security in Russia, statistics data, rules and regulations on the development, implementation and evaluation of effectiveness state and municipal programs, national and regional programs on "Environmental protection" of the Far East subjects, adopted for the period 2020-2025. Having analysed 211 indicators proposed in the regional programs in order to determine the share of the most significant for environmental protection, the correlation of their content with the specifics of regional development has been established. It has been determined that more than 50% of all indicators relate to direct improvement of the environment. During the analysis, the main shortcomings in the selection of the indicators have been identified: 16% of indicators are not correct in content; 41% of indicators do not have clear quantitative benchmarks, which does not always make it possible to assess the achievement of objectives. The solution of the indicated issues will allow expanding the theoretical knowledge in terms of the formation of regional environmental policy and enriching the practice of regional interpretation and solution of accumulated problems, which is demanded due to the limited number of works in this area.

查看原文本刊更多论文

远东地区环境规划:指标分析

解决环境保护领域的区域问题是在有针对性的环境规划的框架内进行的，这些文件反映了正在进行的区域环境政策的本质。批准的指标监测其实施的有效性。在许多地区，以往方案的实施效果令人失望，原因是多方面的。以下问题仍未得到解答:在计划的制定中如何结合国家和地区利益，计划任务的内容及其有效性指标如何与这些文件的目标相对应?本研究的假设是，区域环境规划的不完善使其有效性复杂化。本研究的目的是分析远东经济最发达地区环境规划中使用的固定指标的内容，以确定最优先的区域环境任务及其解决方案的重点，以便在随后的环境保护文件修订中完善指标体系。该信息库包括俄罗斯环境安全领域的规范性文件，统计数据，关于制定，实施和评估有效性的国家和市政计划的规则和条例，以及2020-2025年期间通过的远东主题的“环境保护”国家和地区计划。通过对211项区域规划指标的分析，确定了环境保护指标在区域规划中所占的比重，建立了其内容与区域发展具体情况的相关性。经确定，所有指标中有50%以上与环境的直接改善有关。在分析过程中，发现了指标选择上的主要不足:16%的指标内容不正确;41%的指标没有明确的数量基准，这并不总是能够评估目标的实现情况。这些问题的解决将有助于拓展区域环境政策形成方面的理论知识，并丰富区域解释和解决积累问题的实践，这是由于该领域的工作数量有限所需要的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Voprosy Gosudarstvennogo i Munitsipalnogo Upravleniya-Public Administration Issues PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ISSUES is a scientific peer-reviewed journal published by the National Research University High School of Economics (NRU HSE).The journal is published quarterly in Russian, and contains original articles by Russian and foreign authors. In addition, a special English language issue containing original articles by Russian and foreign authors has been published since 2014. The editorial board consists of leading Russian and foreign scientists in the field of public administration as well as prominent practitioners. The journal is indexed in the international databases: Scopus, RePEc, EBSCOand the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) on the platform of Web of Science. In addition, the journal is on the list of key peer-reviewed scientific journals and publications that the Higher Certification (Attestation) Commission in the RF Education Ministry recommends for publishing the main scientific results of theses for PhD and doctoral degrees in Economics, Sociology and Law. The journal focuses on the following subject areas: − Current theories of public administration. − Theoretical fundamentals of economic and social policy − Factors and Assessment of efficiency in public and municipal administration. − Innovations in the system of public and municipal administration. − Planning and forecasting in the system of public and municipal administration. − Staff of the state and municipal service. Management of personnel in public and municipal bodies and in organizations of the public sectors. − Financial, logistical and information resources of the state and municipalities. − Public service. − Functional features of public sector organizations. − Partnership of the state and municipalities with nongovernmental nonprofit organizations. Economic and administrative challenges facing “third sector.” - Development of education programs on public administration.