The Analysis of Fraud in Perspective of Fraud Pentagon Theory: An Empirical Study in Indonesia

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Heriyanni Mashitoh, Eka Wirajuang Daurrohmah, Dedi Iskandar Inan, Antares Firman
{"title":"The Analysis of Fraud in Perspective of Fraud Pentagon Theory: An Empirical Study in Indonesia","authors":"Heriyanni Mashitoh, Eka Wirajuang Daurrohmah, Dedi Iskandar Inan, Antares Firman","doi":"10.18196/jati.v6i2.18765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to delve into the primary causes of fraud, focusing on the fraud pentagon theory that encompasses all types of fraud in both the public and private sectors particularly in Indonesia. Using a qualitative phenomenological descriptive method, this study seeks to gain deep insights into individual subjective experiences, especially from the perspective of forensic auditors. These auditors are not only experts in investigating fraud but are also skilled in analyzing financial data, evaluating internal controls, and formulating recommendations based on their investigations. This research employs a semi-structured interview approach and involves 11 forensic auditors with CFE or CFrA certifications from both AUI of BPK and the ACFE Indonesian chapter. Through this analysis, the study offers a unique contribution to the literature by highlighting region-specific cultural and social dynamics, such as the profound reliance on religious-based justifications or political affiliations, adding complexity to the understanding of fraud in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":53884,"journal":{"name":"JATI-Journal of Southeast Asian Studies","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JATI-Journal of Southeast Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/jati.v6i2.18765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to delve into the primary causes of fraud, focusing on the fraud pentagon theory that encompasses all types of fraud in both the public and private sectors particularly in Indonesia. Using a qualitative phenomenological descriptive method, this study seeks to gain deep insights into individual subjective experiences, especially from the perspective of forensic auditors. These auditors are not only experts in investigating fraud but are also skilled in analyzing financial data, evaluating internal controls, and formulating recommendations based on their investigations. This research employs a semi-structured interview approach and involves 11 forensic auditors with CFE or CFrA certifications from both AUI of BPK and the ACFE Indonesian chapter. Through this analysis, the study offers a unique contribution to the literature by highlighting region-specific cultural and social dynamics, such as the profound reliance on religious-based justifications or political affiliations, adding complexity to the understanding of fraud in Indonesia.
诈欺五角大楼理论视角下的诈欺分析:印尼的实证研究
本研究旨在深入研究欺诈的主要原因,重点是欺诈五角大楼理论,包括所有类型的欺诈在公共和私营部门,特别是在印度尼西亚。采用定性现象学描述方法,本研究试图深入了解个人主观经验,特别是从法医审计师的角度。这些审计员不仅是调查欺诈的专家,而且在分析财务数据、评估内部控制和根据调查提出建议方面也很熟练。本研究采用半结构化访谈方法,涉及来自BPK AUI和ACFE印度尼西亚分会的11名具有CFE或CFrA认证的法务审计师。通过这种分析,该研究通过强调特定区域的文化和社会动态,例如对基于宗教的理由或政治派别的深刻依赖,为理解印度尼西亚的欺诈行为增加了复杂性,为文献提供了独特的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JATI-Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
JATI-Journal of Southeast Asian Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信