Performance of Nonparametric Person-Fit Statistics with Unfolding versus Dominance Response Models

Jennifer Reimers, Ronna C. Turner, Jorge N. Tendeiro, Wen-Juo Lo, Elizabeth Keiffer
{"title":"Performance of Nonparametric Person-Fit Statistics with Unfolding versus Dominance Response Models","authors":"Jennifer Reimers, Ronna C. Turner, Jorge N. Tendeiro, Wen-Juo Lo, Elizabeth Keiffer","doi":"10.1080/15366367.2023.2165891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPerson-fit analyses are commonly used to detect aberrant responding in self-report data. Nonparametric person fit statistics do not require fitting a parametric test theory model and have performed well compared to other person-fit statistics. However, detection of aberrant responding has primarily focused on dominance response data, thus the effectiveness of person-fit statistics in detecting different aberrant behaviors in ideal point data is unclear. This study compares the performance of nonparametric person-fit statistics in unfolding and dominance model contexts. Results for dominance data indicate that increases in detection rates depend, among other factors, on type of aberrant responding and person-fit statistic used. The detection of aberrant responses in ideal point data was ineffective using four nonparametric person-fit statistics, with slightly higher type I error and power less than 0.25. Additional research is needed to identify or develop nonparametric or parametric person-fit statistics effective for aberrant behavior exhibited in ideal point data.KEYWORDS: Nonparametricperson-fit statisticsaberrantideal-pointdominanceresponse models Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.","PeriodicalId":476852,"journal":{"name":"Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2023.2165891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTPerson-fit analyses are commonly used to detect aberrant responding in self-report data. Nonparametric person fit statistics do not require fitting a parametric test theory model and have performed well compared to other person-fit statistics. However, detection of aberrant responding has primarily focused on dominance response data, thus the effectiveness of person-fit statistics in detecting different aberrant behaviors in ideal point data is unclear. This study compares the performance of nonparametric person-fit statistics in unfolding and dominance model contexts. Results for dominance data indicate that increases in detection rates depend, among other factors, on type of aberrant responding and person-fit statistic used. The detection of aberrant responses in ideal point data was ineffective using four nonparametric person-fit statistics, with slightly higher type I error and power less than 0.25. Additional research is needed to identify or develop nonparametric or parametric person-fit statistics effective for aberrant behavior exhibited in ideal point data.KEYWORDS: Nonparametricperson-fit statisticsaberrantideal-pointdominanceresponse models Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
非参数人-拟合统计在展开与优势反应模型中的表现
摘要个体拟合分析通常用于检测自我报告数据中的异常反应。非参数人拟合统计不需要拟合参数检验理论模型,并且与其他人拟合统计相比表现良好。然而,异常反应的检测主要集中在优势反应数据上,因此人拟合统计在理想点数据中检测不同异常行为的有效性尚不清楚。本研究比较了非参数个人拟合统计在展开模型和优势模型背景下的表现。优势数据的结果表明,检出率的增加除其他因素外,还取决于异常反应的类型和使用的个人适合统计。使用四种非参数人拟合统计量检测理想点数据中的异常反应无效,I型误差略高,功率小于0.25。需要进一步的研究来确定或发展非参数或参数人拟合统计有效的异常行为表现在理想的点数据。关键词:非参数人拟合统计偏差交易点优势反应模型披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信