Clinical and Diagnostic Efficiency of the Study of the Quality of Life According to the Questionnaires PHEC-22 and Catquest-9SF after Bilateral Cataract Phacoemulsification and Monofocal IOL Implantation

Q4 Medicine
V. V. Neroev, N. I. Ovechkin
{"title":"Clinical and Diagnostic Efficiency of the Study of the Quality of Life According to the Questionnaires PHEC-22 and Catquest-9SF after Bilateral Cataract Phacoemulsification and Monofocal IOL Implantation","authors":"V. V. Neroev, N. I. Ovechkin","doi":"10.18008/1816-5095-2023-3-497-501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : сomparative clinical and diagnostic efficiency of the quality of life (QОL) according to the PHEC-22 and Catquest-9SF questionnaires after bilateral cataract phacoemulsification and monofocal IOL implantation. Patients and Methods . We observed 148 patients with binocular cataract (mean age 58.6 ± 1.8 years). All patients underwent standard cataract phacoemulsification with implantation of a monofocal IOL. Patients were examined before and after (one month after surgery on the second eye) surgery. The results of the survey on the questionnaires PHEC-22 and Catquest-9SF were evaluated by the general indicator of testing (GIT) as the sum of points for all questions (taking into account the “weight” coefficients in the questionnaire PHEC-22). Along with this, each of the patients underwent a study of binocular BCVA. Results. A statistically significantly higher clinical and diagnostic efficiency of the PHEC-22 questionnaire compared to Catquest-9SF was established, which is confirmed by a higher (by 0.17 rel. units, p < 0.01) level of correlation with BCVA, as well as a higher probability of compliance of the QOL level with the BCVA range, especially at low (0.4 and less rel. units, by 18.5 %, p < 0.01) and medium (0.5–0,8 relative units, by 7.3 %, p < 0.05) values of BCVA, while in the range of BCVA 0.9–1.0 relative units, no significant differences between the questionnaires were found (p > 0.05). Conclusion . The results of a comparative study after bilateral cataract phacoemulsification and monofocal IOL implantation using the PHEC-22 and Catquest-9SF questionnaires revealed a significantly higher clinical and diagnostic efficiency of the PHEC-22 questionnaire, which is associated with the methodological principles for developing a questionnaire based on the “social model” of health with the involvement of expert ophthalmologists and the use of the optimal procedure for scaling the patient’s responses. The results obtained (taking into account clinical normalization) allow us to recommend the PHEC-22 questionnaire for inclusion in the complex diagnosis of patients with cataracts both before and after surgery in solving a number of urgent problems — a comparative assessment of IOL, a study of the effectiveness of methods for postoperative rehabilitation of patients, the choice of the optimal formula for calculating IOL and some others.","PeriodicalId":37645,"journal":{"name":"Oftalmologiya","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oftalmologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2023-3-497-501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose : сomparative clinical and diagnostic efficiency of the quality of life (QОL) according to the PHEC-22 and Catquest-9SF questionnaires after bilateral cataract phacoemulsification and monofocal IOL implantation. Patients and Methods . We observed 148 patients with binocular cataract (mean age 58.6 ± 1.8 years). All patients underwent standard cataract phacoemulsification with implantation of a monofocal IOL. Patients were examined before and after (one month after surgery on the second eye) surgery. The results of the survey on the questionnaires PHEC-22 and Catquest-9SF were evaluated by the general indicator of testing (GIT) as the sum of points for all questions (taking into account the “weight” coefficients in the questionnaire PHEC-22). Along with this, each of the patients underwent a study of binocular BCVA. Results. A statistically significantly higher clinical and diagnostic efficiency of the PHEC-22 questionnaire compared to Catquest-9SF was established, which is confirmed by a higher (by 0.17 rel. units, p < 0.01) level of correlation with BCVA, as well as a higher probability of compliance of the QOL level with the BCVA range, especially at low (0.4 and less rel. units, by 18.5 %, p < 0.01) and medium (0.5–0,8 relative units, by 7.3 %, p < 0.05) values of BCVA, while in the range of BCVA 0.9–1.0 relative units, no significant differences between the questionnaires were found (p > 0.05). Conclusion . The results of a comparative study after bilateral cataract phacoemulsification and monofocal IOL implantation using the PHEC-22 and Catquest-9SF questionnaires revealed a significantly higher clinical and diagnostic efficiency of the PHEC-22 questionnaire, which is associated with the methodological principles for developing a questionnaire based on the “social model” of health with the involvement of expert ophthalmologists and the use of the optimal procedure for scaling the patient’s responses. The results obtained (taking into account clinical normalization) allow us to recommend the PHEC-22 questionnaire for inclusion in the complex diagnosis of patients with cataracts both before and after surgery in solving a number of urgent problems — a comparative assessment of IOL, a study of the effectiveness of methods for postoperative rehabilitation of patients, the choice of the optimal formula for calculating IOL and some others.
根据PHEC-22和Catquest-9SF问卷对双侧白内障超声乳化术和单焦点人工晶体植入术后生活质量的临床及诊断效果研究
目的:比较通过PHEC-22和Catquest-9SF问卷对双侧白内障超声乳化术和单焦点人工晶状体植入术后生活质量(QОL)的临床和诊断效果。患者和方法。我们观察了148例双目白内障患者(平均年龄58.6±1.8岁)。所有患者均行标准白内障超声乳化术及单焦点人工晶体植入术。患者于手术前后(第二眼术后1个月)进行检查。问卷PHEC-22和Catquest-9SF的调查结果采用综合测试指标(GIT)作为所有问题的积分之和(考虑问卷PHEC-22中的“权重”系数)进行评估。与此同时,每位患者都进行了双目BCVA研究。结果。与Catquest-9SF相比,PHEC-22问卷的临床和诊断效率有统计学意义上的提高,这一点得到了更高(0.17 rel. units, p <0.01)与BCVA的相关水平,以及生活质量水平符合BCVA范围的概率更高,特别是在低(0.4及更低的rel.单位)时,达到18.5%,p <0.01)和培养基(0.5 - 0,8相对单位,比7.3%,p <0.05)值,而在BCVA 0.9 ~ 1.0相对单位范围内,问卷间无显著差异(p >0.05)。结论。对双侧白内障超声乳化术和单焦点人工晶状体植入术后使用PHEC-22问卷和Catquest-9SF问卷的对比研究结果显示,PHEC-22问卷的临床和诊断效率明显更高。这与开发基于健康“社会模式”的问卷调查的方法学原则有关,专家眼科医生参与其中,并使用最佳程序来衡量患者的反应。所获得的结果(考虑到临床规范化)使我们能够推荐将PHEC-22问卷纳入白内障患者术前和术后的复杂诊断中,以解决一些紧迫的问题- IOL的比较评估,患者术后康复方法的有效性研究,计算IOL的最佳公式的选择等等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oftalmologiya
Oftalmologiya Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The scientific journal Oftalmologiya is included in the Scopus database. Publisher country is RU. The main subject areas of published articles are Ophthalmology, Физиология, Клиническая медицина, Профилактическая медицина, Медико-биологические науки, Фармацевтические науки. Before sending a scientific article, we recommend you to read the section For authors. This will allow you to prepare an article better for publication, to make it more interesting for the readers and useful for the scientific community. By following these steps, you will greatly increase the likelihood of your scientific article publishing in journals included in international citation systems (e.g., Scopus). Then you may choose a different journal, select the journal included to list of SAC Russia journal list, or send your scientific work for review and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信