Initial experience with the Expressman™ guide catheter extension in a high-volume tertiary cardiology center

Eduardo Silveira, João Slaviero, Alexandre Azmus, Cláudio Moraes, Julio Teixeira, Rogério Leite, André Manica, Henrique Gomes, Claudio Moraes, Eduardo Azevedo, Julia Teixeira, Felipe Fuchs, Pedro Piccaro, Alexandre Quadros
{"title":"Initial experience with the Expressman™ guide catheter extension in a high-volume tertiary cardiology center","authors":"Eduardo Silveira, João Slaviero, Alexandre Azmus, Cláudio Moraes, Julio Teixeira, Rogério Leite, André Manica, Henrique Gomes, Claudio Moraes, Eduardo Azevedo, Julia Teixeira, Felipe Fuchs, Pedro Piccaro, Alexandre Quadros","doi":"10.31160/jotci202331a20230009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Guide catheter extensions provide increased support in complex percutaneous coronary interventions. The ExpressmanTM is a novel guide catheter extension and the objective was to assess the impact of its use on procedural success and complications in a high-volume reference center. Methods: We analyzed data from all consecutive procedures in which the ExpressmanTM guide catheter extension was used. The decision to use a guide catheter extension was at operator’s discretion. Device success was defined as the successful positioning of the guide catheter extension in the coronary vessel and procedural success was defined as <20% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 flow, with no loss of significant side branches. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and stroke. Results: From April 2022 to January 2023, 34 procedures were included. The majority of the patients were male (59%) and the mean age was 66.5 years. Guide catheter extension use was not planned pre-procedure in 17 procedures (50%). The most common reasons for guide catheter extension use were target vessel angulation or tortuosity and unfavorable coronary ostium position. Device success was obtained in 88% and revascularization success in 91%. There were three side branch occlusions. During in-hospital clinical follow-up, no major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events or major bleeding occurred. Conclusion: The device success and procedural success were high and the rate of complications was low. Guide catheter extension use as bailout technique in complex anatomies allowed procedural success in the vast majority of otherwise untreatable patients.","PeriodicalId":152272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transcatheter Interventions","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transcatheter Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31160/jotci202331a20230009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Guide catheter extensions provide increased support in complex percutaneous coronary interventions. The ExpressmanTM is a novel guide catheter extension and the objective was to assess the impact of its use on procedural success and complications in a high-volume reference center. Methods: We analyzed data from all consecutive procedures in which the ExpressmanTM guide catheter extension was used. The decision to use a guide catheter extension was at operator’s discretion. Device success was defined as the successful positioning of the guide catheter extension in the coronary vessel and procedural success was defined as <20% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 flow, with no loss of significant side branches. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and stroke. Results: From April 2022 to January 2023, 34 procedures were included. The majority of the patients were male (59%) and the mean age was 66.5 years. Guide catheter extension use was not planned pre-procedure in 17 procedures (50%). The most common reasons for guide catheter extension use were target vessel angulation or tortuosity and unfavorable coronary ostium position. Device success was obtained in 88% and revascularization success in 91%. There were three side branch occlusions. During in-hospital clinical follow-up, no major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events or major bleeding occurred. Conclusion: The device success and procedural success were high and the rate of complications was low. Guide catheter extension use as bailout technique in complex anatomies allowed procedural success in the vast majority of otherwise untreatable patients.
Expressman™导管扩展在大容量三级心脏病中心的初步经验
背景:导管延伸在复杂的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中提供了更多的支持。ExpressmanTM是一种新型导尿管延长装置,目的是评估其在大容量参考中心中对手术成功率和并发症的影响。方法:我们分析所有使用ExpressmanTM导管延长术的连续手术数据。使用导管延长的决定由操作者自行决定。器械成功定义为引导导管延伸在冠状血管内的成功定位,手术成功定义为<20%残余狭窄和timi3血流,无重要侧支损失。主要心脑血管不良事件定义为全因死亡、心肌梗死、靶血管重建术和脑卒中的复合事件。结果:2022年4月至2023年1月共纳入34例手术。患者以男性居多(59%),平均年龄66.5岁。17例(50%)手术前未计划使用导尿管延长。引导导管延长使用的最常见原因是靶血管成角或扭曲以及不利的冠状动脉开口位置。器械成功率88%,血运重建成功率91%。侧支闭塞3例。在住院临床随访期间,未发生重大心脑血管不良事件或大出血。结论:器械成功率高,手术成功率高,并发症发生率低。导尿管延长作为复杂解剖结构的救助技术,在绝大多数无法治疗的患者中获得了手术上的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信