Analisis Putusan Hakim No. 180/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Sda terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga

Lutfiah Fauzi, Emy Rosnawati
{"title":"Analisis Putusan Hakim No. 180/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Sda terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga","authors":"Lutfiah Fauzi, Emy Rosnawati","doi":"10.47134/researchjet.v2i4.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Victims of domestic violence are mostly experienced by women and must get protection from society and the state in order to avoid and be free from violence and torture that has degraded the degree and dignity of human beings. Domestic violence, especially the atrocities committed by partners against their partners, leads not only to real torture but also to mental misery. Therefore, victims of domestic violence must receive maximum protection. The purpose of this study is to find out the analysis of the judge's decision No.180/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Sda. This type of research is a normative juridical research using a case approach problem approach. Sources of legal materials obtained in this study are primary and secondary sources of law. While the analysis of legal materials used in this study is deductive analysis because deductive analysis is a technique of analyzing legal materials by collecting facts that are packaged into theories. The results of the analysis of the judge's decision No.180/Pid.Sus/2020 PN. SDA against victims of criminal acts of domestic violence shows that the judge in imposing criminal sanctions on the defendant has been in accordance with the applicable law, namely Article 44 paragraph 1 of the Law on the Elimination of Domestic Violence. However, there was injustice. The judge tried the decision no. 180/Pid.Sus/2020 PN. Sda because what was handed down to the defendant was 3 years in prison. In the judge's decision there is injustice because in Article 44 paragraph (1) of the Law. RI. Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence has regulated that criminal acts of domestic violence must be sentenced to a maximum of 5 (five) years in prison and a fine of Rp. 15,000,000.","PeriodicalId":500380,"journal":{"name":"ResearchJet Journal of Analysis and Inventions","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ResearchJet Journal of Analysis and Inventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47134/researchjet.v2i4.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Victims of domestic violence are mostly experienced by women and must get protection from society and the state in order to avoid and be free from violence and torture that has degraded the degree and dignity of human beings. Domestic violence, especially the atrocities committed by partners against their partners, leads not only to real torture but also to mental misery. Therefore, victims of domestic violence must receive maximum protection. The purpose of this study is to find out the analysis of the judge's decision No.180/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Sda. This type of research is a normative juridical research using a case approach problem approach. Sources of legal materials obtained in this study are primary and secondary sources of law. While the analysis of legal materials used in this study is deductive analysis because deductive analysis is a technique of analyzing legal materials by collecting facts that are packaged into theories. The results of the analysis of the judge's decision No.180/Pid.Sus/2020 PN. SDA against victims of criminal acts of domestic violence shows that the judge in imposing criminal sanctions on the defendant has been in accordance with the applicable law, namely Article 44 paragraph 1 of the Law on the Elimination of Domestic Violence. However, there was injustice. The judge tried the decision no. 180/Pid.Sus/2020 PN. Sda because what was handed down to the defendant was 3 years in prison. In the judge's decision there is injustice because in Article 44 paragraph (1) of the Law. RI. Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence has regulated that criminal acts of domestic violence must be sentenced to a maximum of 5 (five) years in prison and a fine of Rp. 15,000,000.
分析法官判决180/Pid。Sus/2020/PN Sda是针对家庭暴力犯罪受害者的
家庭暴力的受害者大多是妇女,必须得到社会和国家的保护,以避免和摆脱已经降低了人的程度和尊严的暴力和酷刑。家庭暴力,特别是伴侣对伴侣犯下的暴行,不仅导致真正的酷刑,而且导致精神痛苦。因此,家庭暴力受害者必须得到最大限度的保护。本研究的目的是对法官第180/Pid号判决书进行分析。Sus / 2020 / PN Sda。这种类型的研究是一种采用案例方法的规范性法律研究。本研究所获得的法律资料来源分为一级和二级法律资料来源。而本研究中使用的法律材料分析是演绎分析,因为演绎分析是一种通过收集事实来分析法律材料的技术,这些事实被打包成理论。对第180/Pid号判决书的分析结果。Sus / 2020 PN。对家庭暴力犯罪行为受害者的刑事处罚表明,法官在对被告实施刑事制裁时,是按照适用的法律,即《消除家庭暴力法》第44条第1款的规定进行的。然而,这是不公正的。法官驳回了判决。180 / Pid。Sus / 2020 PN。因为被告被判入狱3年。法官的判决是不公正的,因为该法第44条第(1)款规定。RI。关于消除家庭暴力的2004年第23号法令规定,家庭暴力犯罪行为必须判处最高5(5)年监禁和1500万卢比的罚款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信