Evaluation of decision support system for disaster management using multi-criteria decision techniques: a case study of Alappuzha, Kerala

IF 2.2
Pankaj Kant, Pavan Kumar Machavarapu, Anagha R Natha
{"title":"Evaluation of decision support system for disaster management using multi-criteria decision techniques: a case study of Alappuzha, Kerala","authors":"Pankaj Kant, Pavan Kumar Machavarapu, Anagha R Natha","doi":"10.1080/21650020.2023.2262546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The monsoon pattern has shifted across Kerala. This, combined with significant deforestation and hill denuding, has resulted in catastrophic floods and landslides, particularly during the Southwest monsoon. Urgent relief services were to be delivered in a timely and accurate manner in order to sustain the lives of the impacted people. Even though resources were sent to several relief camps, they were either in excess or shortage on multiple instances. The conditions that prevailed during the monsoon time, as well as concerns and challenges during disaster relief efforts, must first be investigated for the effective operation of these supply chain activities. This research aims to develop a disaster logistics hub location selection decision support system, based on the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Best Worst Method (BWM), to meet the needs of disaster victims and rescue teams in the event of flooding, and to implement the proposed systems in Kuttanad, Kerala. Initially, the criteria are determined and structured in the hierarchy, and the weightage for the criteria is done via a questionnaire technique. Expert opinion on nine points scale was gathered from a set of experts working under different levels of positions during disaster management. The weights obtained by the FAHP and BWM methods were statistically analysed and compared for the reliability of the two techniques. The suggested model and application results may throw light on future work, particularly in the realm of disaster logistics management.","PeriodicalId":90388,"journal":{"name":"Urban, planning and transport research","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban, planning and transport research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2023.2262546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The monsoon pattern has shifted across Kerala. This, combined with significant deforestation and hill denuding, has resulted in catastrophic floods and landslides, particularly during the Southwest monsoon. Urgent relief services were to be delivered in a timely and accurate manner in order to sustain the lives of the impacted people. Even though resources were sent to several relief camps, they were either in excess or shortage on multiple instances. The conditions that prevailed during the monsoon time, as well as concerns and challenges during disaster relief efforts, must first be investigated for the effective operation of these supply chain activities. This research aims to develop a disaster logistics hub location selection decision support system, based on the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Best Worst Method (BWM), to meet the needs of disaster victims and rescue teams in the event of flooding, and to implement the proposed systems in Kuttanad, Kerala. Initially, the criteria are determined and structured in the hierarchy, and the weightage for the criteria is done via a questionnaire technique. Expert opinion on nine points scale was gathered from a set of experts working under different levels of positions during disaster management. The weights obtained by the FAHP and BWM methods were statistically analysed and compared for the reliability of the two techniques. The suggested model and application results may throw light on future work, particularly in the realm of disaster logistics management.
用多准则决策技术评价灾害管理决策支持系统:以喀拉拉邦Alappuzha为例
喀拉拉邦的季风模式发生了变化。这一点,再加上大量的森林砍伐和丘陵剥落,导致了灾难性的洪水和山体滑坡,特别是在西南季风期间。应及时和准确地提供紧急救济服务,以维持受影响人民的生命。尽管资源被送到了几个救援营地,但在许多情况下,这些资源要么过剩,要么短缺。季风期间普遍存在的条件,以及救灾工作中的问题和挑战,必须首先调查这些供应链活动的有效运作。本研究旨在开发一套基于模糊层次分析法(FAHP)和最佳最差法(BWM)的灾害物流中心选址决策支持系统,以满足灾民和救援队伍在洪水发生时的需求,并在喀拉拉邦库塔纳德实施所提出的系统。最初,标准是在层次结构中确定和构建的,标准的权重是通过问卷调查技术完成的。专家意见以九分制从一组在灾害管理中不同级别职位工作的专家中收集。对FAHP和BWM方法得到的权重进行了统计分析,并对两种方法的可靠性进行了比较。建议的模型和应用结果可能对未来的工作,特别是在灾害后勤管理领域的工作有所启发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书