Autonomous mobility on demand: from case studies to standardized evaluation

IF 1.9
Ebtehal T. Alotaibi, Thaqal M. Alhuzaymi, J. Michael Herrmann
{"title":"Autonomous mobility on demand: from case studies to standardized evaluation","authors":"Ebtehal T. Alotaibi, Thaqal M. Alhuzaymi, J. Michael Herrmann","doi":"10.3389/ffutr.2023.1224322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an overview of ten case studies of Autonomous Mobility on Demand (AMoD) transportation systems, which are based on realistic data from different urban contexts. Comparing AMoD systems with Conventionally Driven Vehicles (CDV), the limits of reduction of vehicles, the cutting-back of parking spaces, and the increase of empty miles are investigated. As a result of introducing a shared fleet of autonomous vehicles (AV), the analysis demonstrated that 88%–93% of CDV are not required to meet realistic requirements. Parking spaces can be reduced by 83%–97%, while empty miles could be increased by 6%–15%. Nonetheless, fleet dispatching techniques that use the advanced optimization algorithms can reduce the ratio of empty miles by as much as 40%. Consequently, we propose a standard procedure for conducting intelligent transportation system studies (ITS) that can assist in the planning of traffic on urban environments at operational, tactical, and strategic levels. Furthermore, the case studies enabled us to design an Intelligent Transportation System Readiness Level (ITS-RL) scale to assess the realism of case studies, facilitate risk assessment, and provide guidance on how to incorporate AMoD system within a local context.","PeriodicalId":491609,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in future transportation","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in future transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffutr.2023.1224322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We present an overview of ten case studies of Autonomous Mobility on Demand (AMoD) transportation systems, which are based on realistic data from different urban contexts. Comparing AMoD systems with Conventionally Driven Vehicles (CDV), the limits of reduction of vehicles, the cutting-back of parking spaces, and the increase of empty miles are investigated. As a result of introducing a shared fleet of autonomous vehicles (AV), the analysis demonstrated that 88%–93% of CDV are not required to meet realistic requirements. Parking spaces can be reduced by 83%–97%, while empty miles could be increased by 6%–15%. Nonetheless, fleet dispatching techniques that use the advanced optimization algorithms can reduce the ratio of empty miles by as much as 40%. Consequently, we propose a standard procedure for conducting intelligent transportation system studies (ITS) that can assist in the planning of traffic on urban environments at operational, tactical, and strategic levels. Furthermore, the case studies enabled us to design an Intelligent Transportation System Readiness Level (ITS-RL) scale to assess the realism of case studies, facilitate risk assessment, and provide guidance on how to incorporate AMoD system within a local context.
按需自主移动:从案例研究到标准化评估
本文概述了10个基于不同城市背景的实际数据的按需自主移动(AMoD)交通系统的案例研究。将AMoD系统与常规驱动车辆(CDV)系统进行比较,研究了AMoD系统在减少车辆数量、减少停车位和增加空里程方面的局限性。分析表明,由于引入了共享的自动驾驶汽车(AV)车队,88%-93%的CDV不需要满足现实要求。停车位可减少83%-97%,空车里程可增加6%-15%。尽管如此,使用先进优化算法的车队调度技术可以将空车里程率降低多达40%。因此,我们提出了一种进行智能交通系统研究(ITS)的标准程序,可以在操作、战术和战略层面上协助城市环境中的交通规划。此外,案例研究使我们能够设计一个智能交通系统准备水平(ITS-RL)量表,以评估案例研究的现实性,促进风险评估,并为如何将AMoD系统纳入当地环境提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书