Patient-Centered Lab Result Communication Through the Clinic Manager Communication Log (CMCL) at MedZou Community Health Clinic

Shreya Dash, Karolina Pogorzelski, Wendy Zhang, Natalie Long
{"title":"Patient-Centered Lab Result Communication Through the Clinic Manager Communication Log (CMCL) at MedZou Community Health Clinic","authors":"Shreya Dash, Karolina Pogorzelski, Wendy Zhang, Natalie Long","doi":"10.59586/jsrc.v9i1.396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Timely communication of lab results is vital to healthcare delivery. To improve patient care practices, the Clinic Manager Communication Log (CMCL) was implemented at student-run MedZou Community Health Clinic – a free clinic serving uninsured patients in Columbia, Missouri.
 Without a streamlined system in place, there were delays in reporting lab results and communications to patients. Current literature on this topic is scarce.
 Methods: Using an Ishikawa Diagram and mapping workflow, a 2x2 Effort vs. Yield Table was constructed to determine the best lab reporting protocol. As a result, the CMCL was created to track all patient lab communication and follow-up needs. The Clinic Managers (CMs) changed protocol by contacting patients thrice within 1 week, recording all call attempts and information shared between January to August 2022. Retrospective data was collected to calculate turnaround time in reporting lab results prior to CMCL implementation. Feedback was assessed via the Patient Communication Satisfaction Survey.
 Results: Before CMCL implementation, 53.30% of patients never received their lab results. CMCL use showed a statistically significant 31.00% relative increase in patients receiving results (p = 0.002346) and a 12.60% relative increase in results communicated within one week. Out of the patients who couldn’t be reached initially, two-thirds obtained results via a follow-up call. 76.00% of patients rated their communicative experience as “Excellent”. Use of the CMCL showed a statistically significant number of additional patients receiving lab results, streamlining the follow-up process regarding their care.
 Conclusions: The CMCL demonstrates how tracking communication is effective at improving patient care at student-run clinics. A similar model of centralized data collection can be used to ensure reliable and efficient patient follow-up. CMCL access is currently limited to CMs. In the future, additional leadership teams within MedZou can utilize the CMCL data to practice more effective patient communication.","PeriodicalId":73958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of student-run clinics","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of student-run clinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59586/jsrc.v9i1.396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Timely communication of lab results is vital to healthcare delivery. To improve patient care practices, the Clinic Manager Communication Log (CMCL) was implemented at student-run MedZou Community Health Clinic – a free clinic serving uninsured patients in Columbia, Missouri. Without a streamlined system in place, there were delays in reporting lab results and communications to patients. Current literature on this topic is scarce. Methods: Using an Ishikawa Diagram and mapping workflow, a 2x2 Effort vs. Yield Table was constructed to determine the best lab reporting protocol. As a result, the CMCL was created to track all patient lab communication and follow-up needs. The Clinic Managers (CMs) changed protocol by contacting patients thrice within 1 week, recording all call attempts and information shared between January to August 2022. Retrospective data was collected to calculate turnaround time in reporting lab results prior to CMCL implementation. Feedback was assessed via the Patient Communication Satisfaction Survey. Results: Before CMCL implementation, 53.30% of patients never received their lab results. CMCL use showed a statistically significant 31.00% relative increase in patients receiving results (p = 0.002346) and a 12.60% relative increase in results communicated within one week. Out of the patients who couldn’t be reached initially, two-thirds obtained results via a follow-up call. 76.00% of patients rated their communicative experience as “Excellent”. Use of the CMCL showed a statistically significant number of additional patients receiving lab results, streamlining the follow-up process regarding their care. Conclusions: The CMCL demonstrates how tracking communication is effective at improving patient care at student-run clinics. A similar model of centralized data collection can be used to ensure reliable and efficient patient follow-up. CMCL access is currently limited to CMs. In the future, additional leadership teams within MedZou can utilize the CMCL data to practice more effective patient communication.
MedZou社区卫生诊所通过临床管理者沟通日志(CMCL)实现以患者为中心的实验室结果沟通
背景:实验室结果的及时沟通对医疗保健服务至关重要。为了改善患者护理实践,在学生经营的MedZou社区卫生诊所实施了诊所经理沟通日志(CMCL)。MedZou社区卫生诊所是密苏里州哥伦比亚市的一家免费诊所,为没有保险的患者提供服务。如果没有一个精简的系统,报告实验室结果和与患者沟通就会出现延误。目前关于这一主题的文献很少。 方法:采用石川图和映射工作流程,构建一个2x2的工作量与产量表,以确定最佳的实验室报告方案。因此,创建了CMCL来跟踪所有患者实验室通信和随访需求。临床管理人员(CMs)改变方案,在一周内与患者联系三次,记录2022年1月至8月期间的所有呼叫尝试和共享信息。收集回顾性数据以计算在实施CMCL之前报告实验室结果的周转时间。通过患者沟通满意度调查对反馈进行评估。 结果:实施CMCL前,53.30%的患者未收到实验室检查结果。使用CMCL的患者获得结果的相对增加31.00% (p = 0.002346),一周内传达结果的相对增加12.60%,具有统计学意义。在最初无法联系到的患者中,三分之二的人通过随访电话获得了结果。76.00%的患者评价其交流体验为“优秀”。CMCL的使用显示,接收实验室结果的额外患者数量具有统计学意义,简化了他们的护理随访过程。 结论:CMCL展示了跟踪沟通如何有效地改善学生诊所的病人护理。可以使用类似的集中数据收集模型来确保可靠和高效的患者随访。CMCL访问目前仅限于CMs。未来,MedZou的其他领导团队可以利用CMCL数据进行更有效的患者沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信