Reading Patterns, Scanning and the ‘Control F’/Search Icon: How Students Really (Don’t) Read

Nehme Safa, Deema Dakakni
{"title":"Reading Patterns, Scanning and the ‘Control F’/Search Icon: How Students Really (Don’t) Read","authors":"Nehme Safa, Deema Dakakni","doi":"10.47631/mejress.v4i1.584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this research was to investigate whether digital reading had an impact on reading skills, as well as students’ tendencies to read online or offline in the L2 English speaking classroom. Approach/Methodology/Design: This quantitative-qualitative mixed methods case study involved was comprised of a convenient, purposive sample of 16 participants for semi structured focus group interviews in an English-speaking private university. Findings: The findings seem to suggest that reading digitally prods students not only to adopt skimming patterns, but to use the “Control F” command to bypass reading altogether. Furthermore, students’ reading preferences for online/offline material was also revealed, showing a significant tendency of students to revert to online material “just to understand” or “get an idea” while deep understanding was substantially associated with preference for offline reading. Practical Implications: The findings of this study may serve to guide teachers of English in the L2 classroom how to navigate online texts comprehensively, what skills to promote while reading online and which to forgo. Originality/value: This study sheds light on the possible misuse of “Control F” during online reading exercises and underscores the necessity of using this tool over and above reading strategies and skills, and not as a stand-alone tool in itself,","PeriodicalId":475730,"journal":{"name":"Middle Eastern journal of research in education and social sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle Eastern journal of research in education and social sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47631/mejress.v4i1.584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to investigate whether digital reading had an impact on reading skills, as well as students’ tendencies to read online or offline in the L2 English speaking classroom. Approach/Methodology/Design: This quantitative-qualitative mixed methods case study involved was comprised of a convenient, purposive sample of 16 participants for semi structured focus group interviews in an English-speaking private university. Findings: The findings seem to suggest that reading digitally prods students not only to adopt skimming patterns, but to use the “Control F” command to bypass reading altogether. Furthermore, students’ reading preferences for online/offline material was also revealed, showing a significant tendency of students to revert to online material “just to understand” or “get an idea” while deep understanding was substantially associated with preference for offline reading. Practical Implications: The findings of this study may serve to guide teachers of English in the L2 classroom how to navigate online texts comprehensively, what skills to promote while reading online and which to forgo. Originality/value: This study sheds light on the possible misuse of “Control F” during online reading exercises and underscores the necessity of using this tool over and above reading strategies and skills, and not as a stand-alone tool in itself,
阅读模式,扫描和“控制F”/搜索图标:学生如何真正(不)阅读
目的:本研究的目的是调查数字阅读是否对阅读技能有影响,以及学生在第二语言英语口语课堂上在线或离线阅读的倾向。方法/方法/设计:本案例研究采用定量-定性混合方法,在一所英语私立大学进行半结构化焦点小组访谈,选取16名参与者,方便、有目的。研究结果:研究结果似乎表明,数字阅读不仅会促使学生采用略读模式,还会让他们使用“Control F”键来完全绕开阅读。此外,研究还揭示了学生对线上/线下材料的阅读偏好,学生倾向于回归到“只是为了理解”或“获得一个想法”的线上材料,而深度理解与线下阅读的偏好基本相关。实际意义:本研究的发现可能有助于指导第二语言课堂的英语教师如何全面地浏览在线文本,在在线阅读时应该提高哪些技能,放弃哪些技能。原创性/价值:这项研究揭示了在在线阅读练习中可能误用“Control F”,并强调了在阅读策略和技巧之外使用该工具的必要性,而不是将其作为一个独立的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信