Evaluation of Anxiety and Depression Levels in High-Risk Pregnancies During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Their Approaches to Vaccination: A Case-Control Study

Seval Yılmaz Ergani, Huriye Güvenç Sacinti, Müjde Can İbanoğlu, Kadriye Yakut Yücel, Caner Köse, Nazan Vanlı Tonyali, Elif Gülşah Diktaş, Rahmi Sinan Karadeniz, Can Tekin İskender, Yaprak Üstün
{"title":"Evaluation of Anxiety and Depression Levels in High-Risk Pregnancies During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Their Approaches to Vaccination: A Case-Control Study","authors":"Seval Yılmaz Ergani, Huriye Güvenç Sacinti, Müjde Can İbanoğlu, Kadriye Yakut Yücel, Caner Köse, Nazan Vanlı Tonyali, Elif Gülşah Diktaş, Rahmi Sinan Karadeniz, Can Tekin İskender, Yaprak Üstün","doi":"10.21613/gorm.2022.1368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: Anxiety and depression are associated with the interaction of many social factors, but pregnancy and puerperium are periods when patients are particularly sensitive to depression and anxiety. Assessing the level of anxiety and depression in high-risk pregnancies during the pandemic process and their attitudes toward vaccination. STUDY DESIGN: In a case-control study, the Beck Depression and Beck Anxiety Scales were administered to 62 high-risk pregnant women and 296 normal pregnant women who registered at our hospital. At the end of the entire quarantine period and the use of the vaccine in our country, all patients were called and asked whether they had been vaccinated. RESULTS: Anxiety and depression scores of normal patients were higher than those of patients in the risk group (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). The anxiety and depression scores of the normal pregnant patients who were treated as outpatients were higher than those of the patients who were treated as inpatients (p=0.003 and p<0.001, respectively). Depression scores of patients in the last trimester of pregnancy were higher than those of patients at a smaller gestational age (p=0.009). Looking back to the pandemic period after vaccine discovery, depression scores of high-risk pregnant women were found to be higher and those who had a normal pregnancy had higher anxiety and depression scores (p=0.002, p<0.001, p<0.001).CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization had different effects on high-risk and normal pregnant women; while hospitalization increased anxiety in high-risk pregnancies, outpatient follow-up increased anxiety and depression in the normal group.","PeriodicalId":87233,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21613/gorm.2022.1368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anxiety and depression are associated with the interaction of many social factors, but pregnancy and puerperium are periods when patients are particularly sensitive to depression and anxiety. Assessing the level of anxiety and depression in high-risk pregnancies during the pandemic process and their attitudes toward vaccination. STUDY DESIGN: In a case-control study, the Beck Depression and Beck Anxiety Scales were administered to 62 high-risk pregnant women and 296 normal pregnant women who registered at our hospital. At the end of the entire quarantine period and the use of the vaccine in our country, all patients were called and asked whether they had been vaccinated. RESULTS: Anxiety and depression scores of normal patients were higher than those of patients in the risk group (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). The anxiety and depression scores of the normal pregnant patients who were treated as outpatients were higher than those of the patients who were treated as inpatients (p=0.003 and p<0.001, respectively). Depression scores of patients in the last trimester of pregnancy were higher than those of patients at a smaller gestational age (p=0.009). Looking back to the pandemic period after vaccine discovery, depression scores of high-risk pregnant women were found to be higher and those who had a normal pregnancy had higher anxiety and depression scores (p=0.002, p<0.001, p<0.001).CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization had different effects on high-risk and normal pregnant women; while hospitalization increased anxiety in high-risk pregnancies, outpatient follow-up increased anxiety and depression in the normal group.
COVID-19大流行期间高危妊娠的焦虑和抑郁水平评估及其疫苗接种方法:一项病例对照研究
目的:焦虑和抑郁与多种社会因素的相互作用有关,而妊娠期和产褥期是患者对抑郁和焦虑尤为敏感的时期。评估大流行期间高危孕妇的焦虑和抑郁程度及其对疫苗接种的态度。研究设计:在一项病例对照研究中,对在我院登记的62名高危孕妇和296名正常孕妇实施贝克抑郁和贝克焦虑量表。在我国整个隔离期和疫苗使用结束时,所有患者都被打电话询问他们是否接种了疫苗。结果:正常组患者焦虑、抑郁评分均高于高危组患者(p=0.002, p= 0.001)。门诊正常妊娠患者的焦虑、抑郁评分高于住院正常妊娠患者(p=0.003, p= 0.001)。妊娠末3个月患者抑郁评分高于小胎龄患者(p=0.009)。回顾疫苗发现后的大流行时期,发现高危孕妇的抑郁评分较高,正常妊娠孕妇的焦虑和抑郁评分较高(p=0.002, p<0.001, p<0.001)。结论:住院治疗对高危孕妇和正常孕妇的影响不同;住院治疗增加了高危孕妇的焦虑,而门诊随访增加了正常孕妇的焦虑和抑郁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信