Adverse Drug Reaction Tools Used in Causality Assessment

Madaiah Kumaraswamy, Akshay Mohan, Thanveer Ahammed Chonari, Muhammed Dahim
{"title":"Adverse Drug Reaction Tools Used in Causality Assessment","authors":"Madaiah Kumaraswamy, Akshay Mohan, Thanveer Ahammed Chonari, Muhammed Dahim","doi":"10.5530/ijopp.16.4.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) tools are very significant in the detection, assessment, and severity of ADRs. This review emphasizes the most frequently utilized causality assessment scales, for example, the WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre Causality Assessment System, the Naranjo algorithm for the ADR assessment, the Liverpool Causality Assessment Tool (LCAT), and the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM). Bayesian Adverse Reactions Diagnostic Instrument (BARDI). In this review we found that the most commonly preferred tool is Naranjo Algorithm and the most commonly used combination is the WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre causality assessment system and the Naranjo algorithm. Large numbers of causality appraisal strategies have their benefits and burdens. In any case, Due to variation and inconsistency, no single causality assessment measure has been accepted and utilised globally. No single scale, however, has been accepted as standardised and taken into consideration for widespread acceptability. Keywords: Adverse Drug Reaction, Causality assessment tools, Naranjo algorithm, WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre causality assessment system.","PeriodicalId":13495,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/ijopp.16.4.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) tools are very significant in the detection, assessment, and severity of ADRs. This review emphasizes the most frequently utilized causality assessment scales, for example, the WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre Causality Assessment System, the Naranjo algorithm for the ADR assessment, the Liverpool Causality Assessment Tool (LCAT), and the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM). Bayesian Adverse Reactions Diagnostic Instrument (BARDI). In this review we found that the most commonly preferred tool is Naranjo Algorithm and the most commonly used combination is the WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre causality assessment system and the Naranjo algorithm. Large numbers of causality appraisal strategies have their benefits and burdens. In any case, Due to variation and inconsistency, no single causality assessment measure has been accepted and utilised globally. No single scale, however, has been accepted as standardised and taken into consideration for widespread acceptability. Keywords: Adverse Drug Reaction, Causality assessment tools, Naranjo algorithm, WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre causality assessment system.
药物不良反应工具在因果关系评估中的应用
摘要:药物不良反应(adr)工具在adr的检测、评估和严重程度方面具有重要意义。本综述强调了最常用的因果关系评估量表,例如,世卫组织-乌普萨拉监测中心因果关系评估系统、用于不良反应评估的纳兰霍算法、利物浦因果关系评估工具(LCAT)和鲁塞尔-乌克拉夫因果关系评估方法(RUCAM)。贝叶斯不良反应诊断仪。在本综述中,我们发现最常用的首选工具是Naranjo算法,最常用的组合是世卫组织-乌普萨拉监测中心因果关系评估系统和Naranjo算法。大量的因果关系评价策略各有利弊。在任何情况下,由于变化和不一致,没有单一的因果关系评估方法被全球接受和使用。然而,没有一个单一的比额表被认为是标准化的,也没有考虑到广泛的可接受性。关键词:药物不良反应,因果关系评估工具,Naranjo算法,WHO-Uppsala监测中心因果关系评估系统
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信