A comparison of scalpel-bougie-tube and Cric-Guide® in a simulated obese bleeding tissue model

Iain Belford, Kirsty Wright, Adam Janeczko, Simon Crawley, Graeme McLeod, Naveeta Maini
{"title":"A comparison of scalpel-bougie-tube and Cric-Guide® in a simulated obese bleeding tissue model","authors":"Iain Belford, Kirsty Wright, Adam Janeczko, Simon Crawley, Graeme McLeod, Naveeta Maini","doi":"10.21037/joma-23-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Difficult Airway Society (DAS) guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult intubation recommends the scalpel-bougie-tube (SBT) technique for emergency front of neck access (eFONA). Additionally, they recommend an 8–10 cm midline vertical incision in the obese patient. A novel cricothyroidotomy introducer, the Cric-Guide® has been developed to facilitate eFONA. We sought to compare the time required to secure eFONA using the Cric-Guide® compared to the SBT in a tissue model simulating the obese bleeding neck.","PeriodicalId":73878,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral and maxillofacial anesthesia","volume":"352 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral and maxillofacial anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/joma-23-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Difficult Airway Society (DAS) guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult intubation recommends the scalpel-bougie-tube (SBT) technique for emergency front of neck access (eFONA). Additionally, they recommend an 8–10 cm midline vertical incision in the obese patient. A novel cricothyroidotomy introducer, the Cric-Guide® has been developed to facilitate eFONA. We sought to compare the time required to secure eFONA using the Cric-Guide® compared to the SBT in a tissue model simulating the obese bleeding neck.
在模拟肥胖出血组织模型中手术刀-导管与critical - guide®的比较
背景:困难气道学会(DAS)关于意外困难插管管理的指南推荐使用手术刀-布基管(SBT)技术进行紧急颈前插管(eFONA)。此外,他们建议在肥胖患者中做8-10厘米的中线垂直切口。一种新型环状甲状腺切开术引入器,critical - guide®已开发用于促进eFONA。在模拟肥胖出血颈部的组织模型中,我们试图比较使用critical - guide®和SBT固定eFONA所需的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信