Taylor M. Flaherty, Liam J. Johnson, Katharine C. Woollen, Dayanira Lopez, Katherine Gaddis, SaMoura L. Horsley, Jennifer F. Byrnes
{"title":"Speaking of Sex: Critical Reflections for Forensic Anthropologists","authors":"Taylor M. Flaherty, Liam J. Johnson, Katharine C. Woollen, Dayanira Lopez, Katherine Gaddis, SaMoura L. Horsley, Jennifer F. Byrnes","doi":"10.3390/humans3040020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forensic anthropologists have a responsibility to appropriately relay information about a decedent in medicolegal reports and when communicating with the public. The terms ‘sex’ and ‘sex estimation’ have been applied with numerous, inconsistent definitions under the guise that sex—a broad, complex concept—can be reduced to a female/male binary. This binary does not reflect biocultural realities and harms those whose bodies do not meet social expectations of maleness or femaleness. The University of Nevada, Las Vegas’ Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Laboratory (UNLV FAB Lab) advocates for the use of the term ‘assigned sex at birth’ (ASAB) to highlight that binary sex is not biologically inherent to the body, but rather, assigned by society. Additionally, we call for the use of disclaimers in case reports to denote the limitations of ASAB estimation methods, the differentiation between those with mixed trait expression (i.e., indeterminate) and those on whom an ASAB analysis cannot be performed (i.e., unknown), and the included consideration of gender in forensic anthropology research and case reports. Such applications challenge biological normalcy, allowing forensic anthropologists to actively advocate for those whose bodies do not meet biocultural expectations.","PeriodicalId":35511,"journal":{"name":"Humans and Nature","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humans and Nature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/humans3040020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forensic anthropologists have a responsibility to appropriately relay information about a decedent in medicolegal reports and when communicating with the public. The terms ‘sex’ and ‘sex estimation’ have been applied with numerous, inconsistent definitions under the guise that sex—a broad, complex concept—can be reduced to a female/male binary. This binary does not reflect biocultural realities and harms those whose bodies do not meet social expectations of maleness or femaleness. The University of Nevada, Las Vegas’ Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Laboratory (UNLV FAB Lab) advocates for the use of the term ‘assigned sex at birth’ (ASAB) to highlight that binary sex is not biologically inherent to the body, but rather, assigned by society. Additionally, we call for the use of disclaimers in case reports to denote the limitations of ASAB estimation methods, the differentiation between those with mixed trait expression (i.e., indeterminate) and those on whom an ASAB analysis cannot be performed (i.e., unknown), and the included consideration of gender in forensic anthropology research and case reports. Such applications challenge biological normalcy, allowing forensic anthropologists to actively advocate for those whose bodies do not meet biocultural expectations.
法医人类学家有责任在法医报告和与公众沟通时适当地传递有关死者的信息。“性别”和“性别估计”这两个术语已经被用于许多不一致的定义,在性别这个广泛而复杂的概念的幌子下,可以简化为女性/男性二元。这种二元性并没有反映出生物文化的现实,而且伤害了那些身体不符合社会对男性或女性期望的人。内华达大学拉斯维加斯分校法医人类学和生物考古实验室(UNLV FAB Lab)提倡使用“出生时性别分配”(ASAB)一词,以强调二元性别不是生理上固有的,而是由社会分配的。此外,我们呼吁在案例报告中使用免责声明,以表明ASAB估计方法的局限性,混合特征表达(即不确定)和无法进行ASAB分析(即未知)的人之间的区别,以及法医人类学研究和案例报告中包含的性别考虑。这些应用挑战了生物学的常态,使法医人类学家能够积极地为那些身体不符合生物文化期望的人辩护。