Navigating Migration Risks: The Role of Risk Perception and Information Engagement Among Moldovans

Ludmila Bogdan
{"title":"Navigating Migration Risks: The Role of Risk Perception and Information Engagement Among Moldovans","authors":"Ludmila Bogdan","doi":"10.1177/23315024231201622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines migration risk perception and information engagement by potential migrants from Moldova. Employing a qualitative interview approach ( N = 30), it explores the behaviors, intentions, and perceptions that underpin how potential migrants understand labor migration risks. It establishes a robust connection between risk perception and the active pursuit of pertinent information. The study offers a matrix that illustrates the interplay between migration risk perception (high vs. low) and type of risk (individual vs. systemic). It finds that respondents in the High Risk — Systemic group refrain from seeking information, viewing all migration as inherently highly risky due to systemic factors beyond their control. The Low Risk — Systemic group believes migration carries relatively low risks, but that these risks are not individually manageable. The Low Risk — Individual group engages passively with safe migration information because of their perception of low risk. The High Risk — Individual group actively seeks information about safe migration, believing that they can overcome potential risks. In short, the study finds that potential migrants’ perception and understanding of risk shapes their engagement with safe migration information. The study also highlights gender disparities in risk perception and response. While women emphasize concerns tied to sexual exploitation and separation from family, men are more likely to fear fatal accidents and industry-specific exploitation. The study’s findings should inform the development of policy frameworks and migration information campaigns that reflect diverse perceptions and understandings of migration risk. Policy Recommendations: To mitigate migration risks and promote safer practices, policymakers at various levels, including the Moldovan government, international agencies (e.g., IOM, UNHCR, and ILO), non-governmental organizations (like LaStrada), and EU bodies, should: Tailor public education and communication campaigns for diverse risk factors, using different messaging for varying risk perceptions. Address gender-specific concerns with practical advice and resources. Develop comprehensive risk awareness programs covering physical, emotional, and psychological challenges. Use diverse channels (hotlines, online platforms, and workshops) to reach a broader audience. Strengthen embassy services, ensuring staff are informed about migration risks, challenges, and effective outreach and education strategies. Collaborate with mental health professionals to provide psychosocial support. Engage returnee migrants as credible sources of information and advice. Include migration topics in school curricula to enhance migration risk preparedness. By acknowledging risk perception and adapting information strategies accordingly, policymakers at international, regional, and local levels can create effective initiatives and communicating strategies for secure migration.","PeriodicalId":90638,"journal":{"name":"Journal on migration and human security","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on migration and human security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23315024231201622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines migration risk perception and information engagement by potential migrants from Moldova. Employing a qualitative interview approach ( N = 30), it explores the behaviors, intentions, and perceptions that underpin how potential migrants understand labor migration risks. It establishes a robust connection between risk perception and the active pursuit of pertinent information. The study offers a matrix that illustrates the interplay between migration risk perception (high vs. low) and type of risk (individual vs. systemic). It finds that respondents in the High Risk — Systemic group refrain from seeking information, viewing all migration as inherently highly risky due to systemic factors beyond their control. The Low Risk — Systemic group believes migration carries relatively low risks, but that these risks are not individually manageable. The Low Risk — Individual group engages passively with safe migration information because of their perception of low risk. The High Risk — Individual group actively seeks information about safe migration, believing that they can overcome potential risks. In short, the study finds that potential migrants’ perception and understanding of risk shapes their engagement with safe migration information. The study also highlights gender disparities in risk perception and response. While women emphasize concerns tied to sexual exploitation and separation from family, men are more likely to fear fatal accidents and industry-specific exploitation. The study’s findings should inform the development of policy frameworks and migration information campaigns that reflect diverse perceptions and understandings of migration risk. Policy Recommendations: To mitigate migration risks and promote safer practices, policymakers at various levels, including the Moldovan government, international agencies (e.g., IOM, UNHCR, and ILO), non-governmental organizations (like LaStrada), and EU bodies, should: Tailor public education and communication campaigns for diverse risk factors, using different messaging for varying risk perceptions. Address gender-specific concerns with practical advice and resources. Develop comprehensive risk awareness programs covering physical, emotional, and psychological challenges. Use diverse channels (hotlines, online platforms, and workshops) to reach a broader audience. Strengthen embassy services, ensuring staff are informed about migration risks, challenges, and effective outreach and education strategies. Collaborate with mental health professionals to provide psychosocial support. Engage returnee migrants as credible sources of information and advice. Include migration topics in school curricula to enhance migration risk preparedness. By acknowledging risk perception and adapting information strategies accordingly, policymakers at international, regional, and local levels can create effective initiatives and communicating strategies for secure migration.
导航移民风险:风险感知和信息参与在摩尔多瓦人中的作用
本研究考察了摩尔多瓦潜在移民的移民风险感知和信息参与。采用定性访谈方法(N = 30),研究了潜在移民如何理解劳动力迁移风险的行为、意图和观念。它在风险感知和积极寻求相关信息之间建立了牢固的联系。该研究提供了一个矩阵,说明了迁移风险感知(高vs低)和风险类型(个人vs系统)之间的相互作用。研究发现,高风险-系统性群体的受访者不愿寻求信息,认为所有移民本身都是高风险的,因为系统性因素超出了他们的控制范围。低风险-系统组认为移民的风险相对较低,但这些风险不是单独可控的。低风险-个体群体被动地接受安全移民信息,因为他们认为风险较低。高风险-个人群体积极寻求有关安全移民的信息,相信他们可以克服潜在的风险。简而言之,该研究发现,潜在移民对风险的感知和理解影响了他们对安全移民信息的参与。该研究还强调了在风险认知和反应方面的性别差异。当女性强调与性剥削和与家庭分离有关的担忧时,男性更可能担心致命事故和特定行业的剥削。研究结果应该为政策框架和移民信息运动的制定提供信息,以反映对移民风险的不同看法和理解。政策建议:为了减轻移民风险并促进更安全的做法,各级政策制定者,包括摩尔多瓦政府、国际机构(如国际移民组织、联合国难民署和国际劳工组织)、非政府组织(如LaStrada)和欧盟机构,应该:针对不同的风险因素量身定制公共教育和宣传活动,使用不同的信息来传达不同的风险观念。用切实可行的建议和资源解决与性别有关的问题。制定全面的风险意识计划,涵盖身体、情感和心理挑战。利用多种渠道(热线、在线平台、研讨会)接触更广泛的受众。加强使馆服务,确保工作人员了解移民风险、挑战以及有效的外联和教育策略。与精神卫生专业人员合作,提供社会心理支持。使返回者移民成为可靠的信息和建议来源。将移徙主题纳入学校课程,以加强对移徙风险的防范。通过承认风险认知并相应地调整信息战略,国际、区域和地方各级的政策制定者可以为安全移民制定有效的举措和沟通战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信