Early response to false claims in Wikipedia, 15 years later

Q2 Computer Science

First Monday Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.5210/fm.v28i9.12912

P.D. Magnus

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fifteen years ago, I conducted a small study testing the error-correction tendency of Wikipedia. Not only is Wikipedia different now than it was then, the community that maintains it is different. Despite the crudity of that study’s methods, it is natural to wonder what the result would be now. So I repeated the earlier study and found surprisingly similar results.

查看原文本刊更多论文

15年后，对维基百科虚假声明的早期回应

15年前，我做了一个小研究，测试维基百科的纠错倾向。不仅现在的维基百科与当时不同，维护它的社区也不同。尽管这项研究的方法很粗糙，但人们很自然地想知道现在的结果会是什么。所以我重复了之前的研究，发现了惊人的相似结果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

First Monday Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： First Monday is one of the first openly accessible, peer–reviewed journals on the Internet, solely devoted to the Internet. Since its start in May 1996, First Monday has published 1,035 papers in 164 issues; these papers were written by 1,316 different authors. In addition, eight special issues have appeared. The most recent special issue was entitled A Web site with a view — The Third World on First Monday and it was edited by Eduardo Villanueva Mansilla. First Monday is indexed in Communication Abstracts, Computer & Communications Security Abstracts, DoIS, eGranary Digital Library, INSPEC, Information Science & Technology Abstracts, LISA, PAIS, and other services.