What is capitalism? Toward a working definition

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Neal Harris, Gerard Delanty
{"title":"What is capitalism? Toward a working definition","authors":"Neal Harris, Gerard Delanty","doi":"10.1177/05390184231203878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 2007–2008 financial crisis, capitalism has returned as a major concept within the social sciences. While this has led to important interventions, there is yet to be a widely accepted definition of the concept. Such a definition matters, both for assessing the merits of recent scholarship but also because attempts at thinking ‘beyond capitalism’ require an understanding of what one is trying to overcome. For it to be of use, we need a definition of capitalism that serves to encompass its varieties yet circumscribed enough to remain meaningful. In this article, we review existing definitions of capitalism and offer our own approach, in the form of a Weberian ideal-typical definition of capitalism. Our approach is to view capitalism as being based on an economic logic consisting of seven elements: (1) free enterprise and the competitive market, (2) the pursuit of profit and its private appropriation, (3) wage labor and the production of commodities, (4) property rights, (5) the financial infrastructure of money and investment that makes possible credit and debt, (6) a highly variable degree of state regulation, and (7) a propensity for growth as the productive re-investment of profit. The economic logic of capitalism interacts with other institutional orders of society to produce the overall shape of capitalism. We argue that this approach can meaningfully help researchers consider the extent to which a given society is capitalist, based on how closely it approximates the ideal-typical definition we have provided.","PeriodicalId":47697,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184231203878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since the 2007–2008 financial crisis, capitalism has returned as a major concept within the social sciences. While this has led to important interventions, there is yet to be a widely accepted definition of the concept. Such a definition matters, both for assessing the merits of recent scholarship but also because attempts at thinking ‘beyond capitalism’ require an understanding of what one is trying to overcome. For it to be of use, we need a definition of capitalism that serves to encompass its varieties yet circumscribed enough to remain meaningful. In this article, we review existing definitions of capitalism and offer our own approach, in the form of a Weberian ideal-typical definition of capitalism. Our approach is to view capitalism as being based on an economic logic consisting of seven elements: (1) free enterprise and the competitive market, (2) the pursuit of profit and its private appropriation, (3) wage labor and the production of commodities, (4) property rights, (5) the financial infrastructure of money and investment that makes possible credit and debt, (6) a highly variable degree of state regulation, and (7) a propensity for growth as the productive re-investment of profit. The economic logic of capitalism interacts with other institutional orders of society to produce the overall shape of capitalism. We argue that this approach can meaningfully help researchers consider the extent to which a given society is capitalist, based on how closely it approximates the ideal-typical definition we have provided.
什么是资本主义?走向工作定义
自2007-2008年金融危机以来,资本主义作为社会科学中的一个主要概念重新出现。虽然这导致了重要的干预措施,但对这一概念的定义尚未得到广泛接受。这样的定义很重要,不仅是为了评估最近的学术成果,也是因为试图“超越资本主义”的思考需要理解自己试图克服的是什么。为了让它有用,我们需要一个资本主义的定义,既要涵盖各种资本主义,又要有足够的限制,以保持其意义。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了现有的资本主义定义,并提出了我们自己的方法,以韦伯式的资本主义理想典型定义的形式。我们的方法是将资本主义视为基于由七个要素组成的经济逻辑:(1)自由企业和竞争性市场,(2)对利润的追求及其私人占有,(3)雇佣劳动和商品生产,(4)产权,(5)使信贷和债务成为可能的货币和投资的金融基础设施,(6)高度可变的国家监管程度,以及(7)作为利润生产性再投资的增长倾向。资本主义的经济逻辑与社会的其他制度秩序相互作用,从而产生资本主义的整体形态。我们认为,这种方法可以有意义地帮助研究人员考虑一个特定社会是资本主义的程度,基于它与我们提供的理想典型定义的接近程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Social Science Information is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research in the social sciences at large with special focus on theoretical debates, methodology and comparative and (particularly) cross-cultural research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信