Assessment of an Experimental Version of fvGFS for TC Genesis Forecasting Ability in the Western North Pacific

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Shu-Jeng Lin, Huang-Hsiung Hsu, Chia-Ying Tu, Cheng-Hsiang Chih
{"title":"Assessment of an Experimental Version of fvGFS for TC Genesis Forecasting Ability in the Western North Pacific","authors":"Shu-Jeng Lin, Huang-Hsiung Hsu, Chia-Ying Tu, Cheng-Hsiang Chih","doi":"10.1175/waf-d-23-0056.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We evaluated the ability of the fvGFS with a 13-km resolution in simulating tropical cyclone genesis (TCG) by conducting hindcast experiments for 42 TCG events over 2018–2019 in the Western North Pacific (WNP). We observed an improved hit rate with a lead time of between 5 and 4 days; however, from 4 to 3 days lead time, no consistent improvement in the temporal and spatial errors of TCG was obtained. More Fail cases occurred when and where a low-level easterly background flow prevailed: from mid-August to September 2018 and after October 2019 and mainly in the eastern WNP. In Hit cases, 850-hPa stream function and divergence, 200-hPa divergence, and genesis potential index (GPI) provided favorable TCG conditions. However, the Hit–Fail case differences in other suggested factors (vertical wind shear, 700-hPa moisture, and SST) were nonsignificant. By contrast, the reanalysis used for validation showed only significant difference in 850-hPa stream function. We stratified the background flow of TCG into four types. The monsoon trough type (82%) provided the most favorable environmental conditions for successful hindcasts, followed by the subtropical high (45%), easterly (17%), and others (0%) types. These results indicated that fvGFS is more capable of enhancing monsoon trough circulation and provides a much better environment for TCG development but is less skillful in other types of background flow that provides weaker large-scale forcing. The results suggest that the most advanced high-resolution weather forecast models such as the fvGFS warrants further improvement to properly simulate the subtle circulation features (e.g., mesoscale convection system) that might provide seeds for TCG.","PeriodicalId":49369,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Forecasting","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-23-0056.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract We evaluated the ability of the fvGFS with a 13-km resolution in simulating tropical cyclone genesis (TCG) by conducting hindcast experiments for 42 TCG events over 2018–2019 in the Western North Pacific (WNP). We observed an improved hit rate with a lead time of between 5 and 4 days; however, from 4 to 3 days lead time, no consistent improvement in the temporal and spatial errors of TCG was obtained. More Fail cases occurred when and where a low-level easterly background flow prevailed: from mid-August to September 2018 and after October 2019 and mainly in the eastern WNP. In Hit cases, 850-hPa stream function and divergence, 200-hPa divergence, and genesis potential index (GPI) provided favorable TCG conditions. However, the Hit–Fail case differences in other suggested factors (vertical wind shear, 700-hPa moisture, and SST) were nonsignificant. By contrast, the reanalysis used for validation showed only significant difference in 850-hPa stream function. We stratified the background flow of TCG into four types. The monsoon trough type (82%) provided the most favorable environmental conditions for successful hindcasts, followed by the subtropical high (45%), easterly (17%), and others (0%) types. These results indicated that fvGFS is more capable of enhancing monsoon trough circulation and provides a much better environment for TCG development but is less skillful in other types of background flow that provides weaker large-scale forcing. The results suggest that the most advanced high-resolution weather forecast models such as the fvGFS warrants further improvement to properly simulate the subtle circulation features (e.g., mesoscale convection system) that might provide seeds for TCG.
试验版fvGFS对北太平洋西部TC成因预报能力的评估
通过对2018-2019年西北太平洋42个热带气旋事件的后发试验,评估了13 km分辨率的fvGFS模拟热带气旋形成的能力。我们发现前置时间在5到4天之间,命中率有所提高;然而,提前4 ~ 3天,TCG的时空误差没有得到一致的改善。在2018年8月中旬至9月以及2019年10月之后,主要在西北地区东部,低空东风背景气流盛行的时候和地方发生了更多的失败病例。850-hPa流函数和散度、200-hPa散度和成因势指数(GPI)为高温下高温形成提供了有利条件。然而,其他建议因素(垂直风切变、700 hpa湿度和海温)的命中-失败情况差异不显著。相比之下,用于验证的再分析显示850-hPa流功能只有显著差异。我们将TCG的背景流程分为四种类型。季风槽型(82%)为成功预报提供了最有利的环境条件,其次是副热带高压型(45%)、东风型(17%)和其他型(0%)。这些结果表明,fvGFS更能增强季风槽环流,为TCG的发展提供更好的环境,但在其他类型的背景气流中表现不佳,这些背景气流提供的大尺度强迫较弱。结果表明,fvGFS等最先进的高分辨率天气预报模式需要进一步改进,以正确地模拟细微的环流特征(如中尺度对流系统),这可能为TCG提供种子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Weather and Forecasting
Weather and Forecasting 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
17.20%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Weather and Forecasting (WAF) (ISSN: 0882-8156; eISSN: 1520-0434) publishes research that is relevant to operational forecasting. This includes papers on significant weather events, forecasting techniques, forecast verification, model parameterizations, data assimilation, model ensembles, statistical postprocessing techniques, the transfer of research results to the forecasting community, and the societal use and value of forecasts. The scope of WAF includes research relevant to forecast lead times ranging from short-term “nowcasts” through seasonal time scales out to approximately two years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信