From Indigenous philosophy in environmental education to Indigenous planetary futures: what would it take?

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Lewis Williams
{"title":"From Indigenous philosophy in environmental education to Indigenous planetary futures: what would it take?","authors":"Lewis Williams","doi":"10.1017/aee.2023.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The past two decades have seen a proliferation of Indigenous philosophy in environmental education. Much of this anti and decolonial work has made significant advances in deconstructing western modernist subjectivities; re-embedding and re-situating Indigenous and western relational epistemologies into human-earth relationality, including critical inquiry into questions of positionality, power-knowledge and human and more-than-human agency. Less articulated, however is the potential of these practices to address large scale and interrelated global challenges associated with climate and cultural-ecological crisis which coincide with the intensification of late capitalism, colonialism, and white supremacism. Relatedly, at global levels human rights approaches to planetary wellbeing continue to predominate and prominent international agreements such as UNDRIP, SDG, IPCCC and the Global Compact for Migration remain siloed from one another. Providing a broad sketch of these themes I then propose a whakapapa or kinship-based approach to life as laying the conceptual foundation for three regenerative place-based strategies which I subsequently introduce. Each strategy treats contemporary global challenges as interconnected and positions Indigenous knowledges and lifeways as playing a crucial role in addressing these. Moving from Indigenous philosophy in environmental education to broad intersectoral action, these strategies also make the interconnections between individual, collectivist, and structural approaches to Indigenous-led intergenerational resilience as one means to support our collective action toward healing human-environmental relations.","PeriodicalId":44842,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Education","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Environmental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2023.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The past two decades have seen a proliferation of Indigenous philosophy in environmental education. Much of this anti and decolonial work has made significant advances in deconstructing western modernist subjectivities; re-embedding and re-situating Indigenous and western relational epistemologies into human-earth relationality, including critical inquiry into questions of positionality, power-knowledge and human and more-than-human agency. Less articulated, however is the potential of these practices to address large scale and interrelated global challenges associated with climate and cultural-ecological crisis which coincide with the intensification of late capitalism, colonialism, and white supremacism. Relatedly, at global levels human rights approaches to planetary wellbeing continue to predominate and prominent international agreements such as UNDRIP, SDG, IPCCC and the Global Compact for Migration remain siloed from one another. Providing a broad sketch of these themes I then propose a whakapapa or kinship-based approach to life as laying the conceptual foundation for three regenerative place-based strategies which I subsequently introduce. Each strategy treats contemporary global challenges as interconnected and positions Indigenous knowledges and lifeways as playing a crucial role in addressing these. Moving from Indigenous philosophy in environmental education to broad intersectoral action, these strategies also make the interconnections between individual, collectivist, and structural approaches to Indigenous-led intergenerational resilience as one means to support our collective action toward healing human-environmental relations.
从环境教育中的土著哲学到土著地球的未来:需要什么?
在过去的二十年里,本土哲学在环境教育中得到了广泛的应用。这些反殖民主义和非殖民主义的作品在解构西方现代主义主体性方面取得了重大进展;将土著和西方的关系认识论重新嵌入和重新定位到人地关系中,包括对位置性、权力-知识、人类和超越人类的代理等问题的批判性探究。然而,这些实践在解决与气候和文化生态危机相关的大规模和相互关联的全球挑战方面的潜力却没有得到明确阐述,这些挑战与晚期资本主义、殖民主义和白人至上主义的加剧相吻合。与此相关,在全球层面,以人权方式处理地球福祉的做法继续占主导地位,而诸如联合国开发计划署、可持续发展目标、联合国气候变化框架公约和《全球移民契约》等著名国际协议仍然彼此孤立。然后,我提出了一种以whakapapa或亲属为基础的生活方式,为我随后介绍的三种再生的基于地点的策略奠定了概念基础。每一项战略都将当代全球挑战视为相互关联的,并认为土著知识和生活方式在应对这些挑战方面发挥着至关重要的作用。从环境教育中的土著哲学到广泛的跨部门行动,这些战略还将土著主导的代际恢复力的个人、集体主义和结构方法之间的相互联系作为支持我们集体行动的一种手段,以治愈人类与环境的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Environmental Education
Australian Journal of Environmental Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: An internationally refereed journal which publishes papers and reports on all aspects of environmental education. It presents information and argument which stimulates debate about educational strategies that enhance the kinds of awareness, understanding and actions which will promote environmental and social justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信