Agrarian conflict and split recognition: The middle way for recognition of the Mapur Bangka Tribe in Indonesia

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Iskandar Zulkarnain, Jamilah Cholillah
{"title":"Agrarian conflict and split recognition: The middle way for recognition of the Mapur Bangka Tribe in Indonesia","authors":"Iskandar Zulkarnain, Jamilah Cholillah","doi":"10.20473/mkp.v36i32023.421-435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the New Order regime, access to tin mines has been a disaster for the Mapur Tribe. The desire to live in prosperity from tin mining led to a prolonged structural agrarian conflict and problems of political recognition. This study aims to analyze agrarian conflicts and the recognition debates that surround them and analyze the visibility of discourses on the recognition that is adaptive to the interests of indigenous peoples. Through qualitative research with case studies, this study found that structural agrarian conflict gave rise to social rupture and acts of mutual exclusion between groups. The counter-movement can unite the group and continue the resistance. After the agrarian conflict, indigenous peoples were faced with debates about the legal product of recognition through sectoral laws which gave rise to different interpretations at the Regional Apparatus Organization (OPD) level. This condition gave rise to the phenomenon of split recognition, due to the lack of political will to include the agenda for recognition of Indigenous Peoples (MHA) in regional planning policies. A comprehensive law with a general function is needed as a middle ground for the unification of arrangements regarding MHA.","PeriodicalId":55930,"journal":{"name":"Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.v36i32023.421-435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the New Order regime, access to tin mines has been a disaster for the Mapur Tribe. The desire to live in prosperity from tin mining led to a prolonged structural agrarian conflict and problems of political recognition. This study aims to analyze agrarian conflicts and the recognition debates that surround them and analyze the visibility of discourses on the recognition that is adaptive to the interests of indigenous peoples. Through qualitative research with case studies, this study found that structural agrarian conflict gave rise to social rupture and acts of mutual exclusion between groups. The counter-movement can unite the group and continue the resistance. After the agrarian conflict, indigenous peoples were faced with debates about the legal product of recognition through sectoral laws which gave rise to different interpretations at the Regional Apparatus Organization (OPD) level. This condition gave rise to the phenomenon of split recognition, due to the lack of political will to include the agenda for recognition of Indigenous Peoples (MHA) in regional planning policies. A comprehensive law with a general function is needed as a middle ground for the unification of arrangements regarding MHA.
土地冲突与分裂承认:印尼马普尔邦卡部落承认的中间道路
自从新秩序政权以来,进入锡矿对马普尔部落来说是一场灾难。对锡矿繁荣生活的渴望导致了长期的结构性农业冲突和政治承认问题。本研究旨在分析土地冲突及其周围的承认辩论,并分析符合土著人民利益的承认话语的可见性。通过定性研究和案例分析,本研究发现,结构性土地冲突导致群体之间的社会破裂和相互排斥行为。反运动可以团结团体,继续抵抗。在土地冲突之后,土著人民面临着关于通过部门法承认的法律产物的辩论,这在区域机构组织一级产生了不同的解释。由于缺乏在区域规划政策中列入承认土著人民议程的政治意愿,这种情况造成了分裂承认的现象。需要一部具有一般功能的综合性法律,作为统一MHA安排的中间地带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik
Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信